Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
This is how I found myself in hospice/palliative
Do you like it? How was the transition? Fellowship or no fellowship?
This is how I found myself in hospice/palliative
I’m mid fellowship right now. PGY 18.Do you like it? How was the transition? Fellowship or no fellowship?
I kinda doubt that. There are some areas where you would be better than a new grad in those areas but I think overall you wouldn't be.Equal probably not. You being an experienced physician. I will not be as good as you in the outpatient setting today or for the next few years.
But an ER doc with 10+ years of experience may provide very similar care to someone new, fresh residency grad as far as hospitalist/outpatient/SNF care. And once any particular ER doc has done outpatient/SNF practice for 3+ years, I think they'll provide better care than any new-ish attending. After 5 or so years, I doubt there would be any measurable difference.
Just like that, I know several FM docs who have been in the ER for decades who provide excellent care equivalent to any EM residency trained doc.
Residency is experience. It's just all experience. Do something for long enough and you'll learn it.
Pfftt that’s easy— just send it to the ERI'm going to quote myself from a few years ago:
Just because you can manage sepsis and I can't doesn't make my job intellectually easier than yours nor does it mean you can easily do my job. Good primary care without being a referral machine isn't easy. Sometimes it is, just like some ED patients require little thought/effort on your part to deal with. Often times is isn't. Uncontrolled HTN with CKD, uncontrolled DM with known retinopathy, and sky high triglycerides and oh by the way having a gout flare. That sort of thing isn't all that unusual for me. 2 of the most popular DM meds are contraindicated with retinopathy with another running the risk of worsening CKD and another dependent on the exact GFR to know if its safe while a 4th is known to cause hypoglycemia with CKD. 2 of the 3 acute gout meds are contraindicated by CKD and uncontrolled DM. 1 of our first line BP meds is contraindicated with uncontrolled gout while another can worsen CKD and a 3rd can worsen lipid levels and if that triglyceride level is high enough combined with bad enough DM you run the risk of pancreatitis which oh by the way is a known side effect of yet another class of DM meds. But if its just the triglycerides it could be caused by the hyperglycemia so do you treat now or wait and see what it does when the sugar level gets better? So you have to decide what to do about all of these, how soon to follow up, things the patient needs to monitor and what to do if X, Y, or Z happens symptom wise, what testing to order and when. Oh, and you have 15 minutes to do all of that and an exam and listen to their story about the time they had gout back in '73 because they tied an onion on their belt which was the style at the time.
I'm not at all saying you aren't capable of that sort of thing because there are plenty of problems y'all see in the ED that require just as many thoughts going on at the same time with other patients waiting some of whom are critically ill. But you're trained for ED problems and the ED work flow while I'm trained to do my scenario with the resources and time-constraints dictated by outpatient practice (for example, stat labs aren't a thing - its 12 hours minimum for any non-POC testing).
As I've said before, we're all physicians first. We did the same 4 years of medical training. So you in all likelihood could do CME and reading and with time get to be pretty good at outpatient primary care. But I would truly appreciate it if you didn't pretend that a 4 hour CME course and some light reading would make you my equal in primary care. It would not.
I kinda doubt that. There are some areas where you would be better than a new grad in those areas but I think overall you wouldn't be.
This isn't a slight against you, but despite your experience you haven't likely spent more than a day or so in an outpatient clinic since med school. A new residency grad has spent several hundred in the last couple of years. Same with hospitalist work.
I do agree that with time you'd catch up, and probably reasonably quickly, but that catch up time could be tricky for the patients since unlike residents you don't have to be supervised.
Also as a side note most americans will be poorly controlled with chronic issues due to insurance denials and poor lifestyle no matter what you do
QFT.
America needs to get a grip.
The state of EM is so bad that people would rather take care of corpses. Take note, medical student lurkers.
I think the sky is falling only on SDN. This place is the moat of negativity.The state of EM is so bad that people would rather take care of corpses. Take note, medical student lurkers.
I think the sky is falling only on SDN. This place is the moat of negativity.
I think that projection should be improving dramatically if that 4 year proposal comes through and if a lot of programs end up with fewer residents due to increased volume requirements. I think in 1 swoop, we would start going back to the job market of pre-covid days.What about the EM job projection of 2027?
Yeah need ozempic need 12 meds and the turkey sandwich. Honestly this managing "DM and HTN" is just treading water you are just managing how fast they will decline that's why you are titrating up and not removing meds hence why its more difficult.
They don't exercise they eat whatever don't schedule an appointment. Nursing home patients don't get exercise and you will have less and less staff and private equity wants more and more.
Resulting turf wars got us to this we have to do a fellowship in which you make way less and work several hours while being geographically restrained
I think that projection should be improving dramatically if that 4 year proposal comes through and if a lot of programs end up with fewer residents due to increased volume requirements. I think in 1 swoop, we would start going back to the job market of pre-covid days.
Maybe but there is a lot of pushback on. making all programs 4 years
1. Complex problems require complex solutions, and this ain’t itFor real.
America could do so much better, but it's going to take radical sociopolitical change.
Return masculinity to America.
Return femininity to America.
Recognize that those are two different things; both necessary.
Yeah not so much anymore.Yeah need ozempic need 12 meds and the turkey sandwich. Honestly this managing "DM and HTN" is just treading water you are just managing how fast they will decline that's why you are titrating up and not removing meds hence why its more difficult.
They don't exercise they eat whatever don't schedule an appointment. Nursing home patients don't get exercise and you will have less and less staff and private equity wants more and more.
Resulting turf wars got us to this we have to do a fellowship in which you make way less and work several hours while being geographically restrained
The blue haired disagreeable variety has entered the chat.1. Complex problems require complex solutions, and this ain’t it
2. Barf
| Domain/Study Type | AI Performance | Physicians Performance | Key Insight (2023–2025) |
|---|---|---|---|
| General clinical vignettes (e.g., JAMA, NEJM) | 76–92% accuracy (standalone AI) | 73–76% (with/without AI aid) | AI often better alone; aid doesn't always improve doctors |
| Complex NEJM cases (Microsoft MAI-DxO) | ~85% | ~20% | AI excels on "stumpers" in controlled tests |
| Radiology (e.g., chest X-rays, mammography) | Matches or slightly higher sensitivity | High, but AI reduces workload | AI strong in pattern recognition; needs human oversight |
| Meta-analyses (generative AI) | ~52% overall accuracy | Often comparable or higher | Not yet reliable substitute |
Strange to me that there's all this hype about LLMs being better than docs. Yet for other fields, which are less complex and have lower stakes, people are starting to **** on it as they realize that it's massively over-hyped. These studies are basically tailor-made for an LLM and dont' translate to real life. (radiology and pathology I don't know enough about, but it seems like it would seem to have potential utility in performing rapid wet reads). Not to mention nerds getting hard-ons about publishing in a new field that's gonna get plenty of media coverage.Also, most of you are forgetting about the elephant in the room which is AI leveraged cross over between specialties. With AI, it's now even easier than ever to practice new forms of medicine that don't require procedures or surgery training. AI has already proven to be comparable if not better than physicians when it comes to diagnostic interpretation. It will only improve from here and will absolutely surpass our ability in the next year. That is a complete game changer.
Domain/Study Type AI Performance Physicians Performance Key Insight (2023–2025) General clinical vignettes (e.g., JAMA, NEJM) 76–92% accuracy (standalone AI) 73–76% (with/without AI aid) AI often better alone; aid doesn't always improve doctors Complex NEJM cases (Microsoft MAI-DxO) ~85% ~20% AI excels on "stumpers" in controlled tests Radiology (e.g., chest X-rays, mammography) Matches or slightly higher sensitivity High, but AI reduces workload AI strong in pattern recognition; needs human oversight Meta-analyses (generative AI) ~52% overall accuracy Often comparable or higher Not yet reliable substitute
Strange to me that there's all this hype about LLMs being better than docs. Yet for other fields, which are less complex and have lower stakes, people are starting to **** on it as they realize that it's massively over-hyped. These studies are basically tailor-made for an LLM and dont' translate to real life. (radiology and pathology I don't know enough about, but it seems like it would seem to have potential utility in performing rapid wet reads). Not to mention nerds getting hard-ons about publishing in a new field that's gonna get plenty of media coverage.
Also, I'm not sure why there's this expectation that it's going to be exponentially better *next year. Is chatgpt that much better now than last year? Most of these tech things rapidly plateau in utility imo.
Strange to me that there's all this hype about LLMs being better than docs. Yet for other fields, which are less complex and have lower stakes, people are starting to **** on it as they realize that it's massively over-hyped. These studies are basically tailor-made for an LLM and dont' translate to real life. (radiology and pathology I don't know enough about, but it seems like it would seem to have potential utility in performing rapid wet reads). Not to mention nerds getting hard-ons about publishing in a new field that's gonna get plenty of media coverage.
Also, I'm not sure why there's this expectation that it's going to be exponentially better *next year. Is chatgpt that much better now than last year? Most of these tech things rapidly plateau in utility imo.
I know, right?Uhhh….
Does this forum have a remind me? Cause none of that is happening. (On the timescale provided)
Yeah, I'm gonna reply to my own post. FREE GENERAL VEERS>You know what we need on here?
....
GeneralVeers.
.... Shut up if you think I'm wrong. Effing guy has aura.
So did Ted Bundy. And David Koresh, at that.Effing guy has aura.
Hey now, I have lots to do.#freegeneralveers
In before mod nerds with nothing to do besides police speech lock thread
I miss that guyYou know what we need on here?
....
GeneralVeers.
.... Shut up if you think I'm wrong. Effing guy has aura.
Our local nursing homes have essentially all NP rounding and when I see these patients, which is frequently, basically nothing ever changes in their management, even when I recommend changes. Sometimes I see them often enough that I am the one primarily modifying their chronic disease medications anyway.Oooh I love this one too.
"There's already substandard card from undertrained doctors/midlevels so I don't have to feel guilty about providing that same substandard care".
With a side helping of "FPs are doing bad work in the ED so I should get to do bad work in FP jobs".
Our local nursing homes have essentially all NP rounding and when I see these patients, which is frequently, basically nothing ever changes in their management, even when I recommend changes. Sometimes I see them often enough that I am the one primarily modifying their chronic disease medications anyway.
Our local nursing homes have essentially all NP rounding and when I see these patients, which is frequently, basically nothing ever changes in their management, even when I recommend changes. Sometimes I see them often enough that I am the one primarily modifying their chronic disease medications anyway.
For real. I'm not FP/IM, but I would do a far better job.
I do this. I work for TeamHealth as medical director for two facilities. I usually spend about 6-7 hours a week at each place (one day a week at each place, go in around 7am, leave around 2pm). Very flexible, can come and go as I need. Occasional phone calls with questions otherwise a few times a week. This year I made about 65K at each facility. Half from RVU, half from a monthly flat medical director fee. It's great. I went from full time to PRN at my ED, and only work about 4-6 ED shifts a month. I stopped doing ED nights because of this. I work mostly weekends and try to pick up extra shifts if they need it to be helpful.
- I do use AI to help with things I don't know
- My wife is FM, so I ask her questions when I need help
- Of course I don't provide top quality primary care, but you should have seen the degenerates who worked here previously. One guy hadn't even show up in person for two years because "he was afraid of catching covid". The nursing homes and patients love me because I work fast, am responsive, and see a ton of patients each day.
I think I’m going to be just like you very soon.
Contract for two nursing homes in my inbox right now, negotiating with them the medical director stipend. Already visited the nursing home facility too and met with their staff. they’ve matched my wife’s $1550/20 patients seen. But they’re giving push back in matching her 60% medical director fee split due to my ‘lack of experience’ - i told them I’m not signing at 45 🤣 will see what happens
I think it’s a relationships game. Sit down with the nursing staff, ask them what they needthem, be available for them and they’ll be very happy. One of the sites that my wife took over - same problem the guy never showed up. But he kept putting notes in the medical charts and claiming to see patients.
Damn man with emotional IQ like this youre gonna be getting 110% split
Can confirm it's all about relationships. I do PM&R at SNFs and half the job is keeping everyone at the facilities happy.I think I’m going to be just like you very soon.
Contract for two nursing homes in my inbox right now, negotiating with them the medical director stipend. Already visited the nursing home facility too and met with their staff. they’ve matched my wife’s $1550/20 patients seen. But they’re giving push back in matching her 60% medical director fee split due to my ‘lack of experience’ - i told them I’m not signing at 45 🤣 will see what happens
I think it’s a relationships game. Sit down with the nursing staff, ask them what they needthem, be available for them and they’ll be very happy. One of the sites that my wife took over - same problem the guy never showed up. But he kept putting notes in the medical charts and claiming to see patients.
As an EM doc, Nursing home sounds terrible. Chronic care was one reason I went into EM. I get the work may be easy, but nursing home just gives me the ick.
Our mission is to provide students with free, unbiased information, resources, and advising for careers in the health professions. We believe every student deserves access to trustworthy guidance, regardless of background or ability to pay.