NYT: SOS Arbitrage

Started by drusso
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drusso

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

"It turns out that I’d stumbled into a lucrative corner of the health care market called hospital outpatient departments, or HOPDs. They do some of the same outpatient care — colonoscopies, X-rays, medication injections — just as doctors’ offices and clinics do. But because they are considered part of a hospital, they get to charge hospital-level prices for these outpatient procedures, even though the patients aren’t as sick as inpatients. Since these facilities don’t necessarily look like hospitals, patients can be easily deceived and end up with hefty financial surprises. I’m a doctor who works in a hospital every day, and I was fooled."

Most HOPD doctors have no idea how their employer is ripping people off or are completely complicit to the scam...
 

"It turns out that I’d stumbled into a lucrative corner of the health care market called hospital outpatient departments, or HOPDs. They do some of the same outpatient care — colonoscopies, X-rays, medication injections — just as doctors’ offices and clinics do. But because they are considered part of a hospital, they get to charge hospital-level prices for these outpatient procedures, even though the patients aren’t as sick as inpatients. Since these facilities don’t necessarily look like hospitals, patients can be easily deceived and end up with hefty financial surprises. I’m a doctor who works in a hospital every day, and I was fooled."

Most HOPD doctors have no idea how their employer is ripping people off or are completely complicit to the scam...
im pretty sure that all employed docs know about SOS(d). at least the vast majority.

there is no doubt there is a problem here. if we were to go to site-neutral payments, probably 1/4 - 1/2 of hospitals wouldnt be able to stay afloat.

we know that there are docs on this forum who send more complicated patients to tertiary care centers b/c the juice isnt worth the squeeze. we also know that PP generally wont take see the indigent or medicaid patients.
 
Do you guys really think site neutral will benefit the office based guys? They will bring everything down to the lowest payments.

SOS arbitrage hasn't helped. I'd rather have a level playing field. I guess while we're at it, we could also "means test" the charity care/community benefit programs of all those hospitals that take Medicaid and "socialize" the tax exemptions to community physicians who see their "fair share" of those patients too.
 
SOS arbitrage hasn't helped. I'd rather have a level playing field. I guess while we're at it, we could also "means test" the charity care/community benefit programs of all those hospitals that take Medicaid and "socialize" the tax exemptions to community physicians who see their "fair share" of those patients too.

it really makes no sense why an ESI pays $200 in an office but $1000 in a hospital (for argument's sake).

if there is a quality difference, then maybe there should be a difference in $$$
 
Yep. A lumbar MRI at the local Catholic non-profit hospital costs over $2K, but at the physician-owned imaging center, it's $800.

What would Jesus do?
wore this to an ugly sweater party. it didnt go over well
1718646622964.png
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Yep. A lumbar MRI at the local Catholic non-profit hospital costs over $2K, but at the physician-owned imaging center, it's $800.

What would Jesus do?
you as a non-HOPD employee doctor are not under any obligation to have the patient get the MRI done at the local Catholic non-profit hospital.

neither are HOPD employees.


i refer to all the radiology departments in town. unfortunately all are now affiliated to hospitals, with 1 exception - a local chiropractor that offers MRIs. i refuse to refer to him, even if cheaper.
 
And how’s this blowing the whistle? They’ve been doing this **** for years and getting away with it. Apparently it’s legal. He’s blowing the whistle on legal, nefarious and amoral practices. It’s horrific but legal so what’s it matter if he blows anything. Not gonna matter
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad