NYT: SOS Arbitrage

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drusso

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
Joined
Nov 21, 1998
Messages
13,276
Reaction score
7,918
Points
8,231
Location
Over the rainbow
  1. Attending Physician

"It turns out that I’d stumbled into a lucrative corner of the health care market called hospital outpatient departments, or HOPDs. They do some of the same outpatient care — colonoscopies, X-rays, medication injections — just as doctors’ offices and clinics do. But because they are considered part of a hospital, they get to charge hospital-level prices for these outpatient procedures, even though the patients aren’t as sick as inpatients. Since these facilities don’t necessarily look like hospitals, patients can be easily deceived and end up with hefty financial surprises. I’m a doctor who works in a hospital every day, and I was fooled."

Most HOPD doctors have no idea how their employer is ripping people off or are completely complicit to the scam...
 

"It turns out that I’d stumbled into a lucrative corner of the health care market called hospital outpatient departments, or HOPDs. They do some of the same outpatient care — colonoscopies, X-rays, medication injections — just as doctors’ offices and clinics do. But because they are considered part of a hospital, they get to charge hospital-level prices for these outpatient procedures, even though the patients aren’t as sick as inpatients. Since these facilities don’t necessarily look like hospitals, patients can be easily deceived and end up with hefty financial surprises. I’m a doctor who works in a hospital every day, and I was fooled."

Most HOPD doctors have no idea how their employer is ripping people off or are completely complicit to the scam...
im pretty sure that all employed docs know about SOS(d). at least the vast majority.

there is no doubt there is a problem here. if we were to go to site-neutral payments, probably 1/4 - 1/2 of hospitals wouldnt be able to stay afloat.

we know that there are docs on this forum who send more complicated patients to tertiary care centers b/c the juice isnt worth the squeeze. we also know that PP generally wont take see the indigent or medicaid patients.
 
Do you guys really think site neutral will benefit the office based guys? They will bring everything down to the lowest payments.

SOS arbitrage hasn't helped. I'd rather have a level playing field. I guess while we're at it, we could also "means test" the charity care/community benefit programs of all those hospitals that take Medicaid and "socialize" the tax exemptions to community physicians who see their "fair share" of those patients too.
 
SOS arbitrage hasn't helped. I'd rather have a level playing field. I guess while we're at it, we could also "means test" the charity care/community benefit programs of all those hospitals that take Medicaid and "socialize" the tax exemptions to community physicians who see their "fair share" of those patients too.

it really makes no sense why an ESI pays $200 in an office but $1000 in a hospital (for argument's sake).

if there is a quality difference, then maybe there should be a difference in $$$
 
so do you check and see that all the places that you send patients for xrays or MRI scans do not do HOPD billing?
 
so do you check and see that all the places that you send patients for xrays or MRI scans do not do HOPD billing?

Yep. A lumbar MRI at the local Catholic non-profit hospital costs over $2K, but at the physician-owned imaging center, it's $800.

What would Jesus do?
 
Yep. A lumbar MRI at the local Catholic non-profit hospital costs over $2K, but at the physician-owned imaging center, it's $800.

What would Jesus do?
wore this to an ugly sweater party. it didnt go over well
1718646622964.png
 
Yep. A lumbar MRI at the local Catholic non-profit hospital costs over $2K, but at the physician-owned imaging center, it's $800.

What would Jesus do?
I don't think spitting in my hands to create mud and rubbing it in a patient's eyes would go over well in my patient population. Does that work in your region?
 
Yep. A lumbar MRI at the local Catholic non-profit hospital costs over $2K, but at the physician-owned imaging center, it's $800.

What would Jesus do?
you as a non-HOPD employee doctor are not under any obligation to have the patient get the MRI done at the local Catholic non-profit hospital.

neither are HOPD employees.


i refer to all the radiology departments in town. unfortunately all are now affiliated to hospitals, with 1 exception - a local chiropractor that offers MRIs. i refuse to refer to him, even if cheaper.
 
Yep. A lumbar MRI at the local Catholic non-profit hospital costs over $2K, but at the physician-owned imaging center, it's $800.

What would Jesus do?
Actually 300 to 500 by me
 
And how’s this blowing the whistle? They’ve been doing this **** for years and getting away with it. Apparently it’s legal. He’s blowing the whistle on legal, nefarious and amoral practices. It’s horrific but legal so what’s it matter if he blows anything. Not gonna matter
 
In my area the local radiologist owned imaging center sold to university hospital. Goodbye $300 lumbar MRI and any reasonably priced imaging anywhere. Resistance is futile??
 
Top Bottom