NYU and Implants

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

doctor.doctor

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2017
Messages
78
Reaction score
16
Hello everyone! Does anyone know if students are allowed to place implants at NYU? During my interview, the tour guide was saying that students are allowed to restore them but she didn't know anything about placing them. I want to be exposed to placing an implant at least once in dental school because that is where the future of dentistry is going and I want to know whether or not I would like to place them in the future when I practice. Any other insight on implants is also appreciated!!

Members don't see this ad.
 
Hello everyone! Does anyone know if students are allowed to place implants at NYU? During my interview, the tour guide was saying that students are allowed to restore them but she didn't know anything about placing them. I want to be exposed to placing an implant at least once in dental school because that is where the future of dentistry is going and I want to know whether or not I would like to place them in the future when I practice. Any other insight on implants is also appreciated!!

Youtube
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Learning how to place implants is something that "can" be important in general dentistry, but the reality is that you are way to basic to be doing that.

You need to be so comfortable with oral surgery/general dentistry before you tackle implant placements. We are talking about hundreds of oral surgery procedures.

Usually doctors become comfortable with implants through a thorough GPR/years of private practice and CE.
 
Learning how to place implants is something that "can" be important in general dentistry, but the reality is that you are way to basic to be doing that.

You need to be so comfortable with oral surgery/general dentistry before you tackle implant placements. We are talking about hundreds of oral surgery procedures.

Usually doctors become comfortable with implants through a thorough GPR/years of private practice and CE.

Not my mouth so yolo /s
 
Learning how to place implants is something that "can" be important in general dentistry, but the reality is that you are way to basic to be doing that.

You need to be so comfortable with oral surgery/general dentistry before you tackle implant placements. We are talking about hundreds of oral surgery procedures.

Usually doctors become comfortable with implants through a thorough GPR/years of private practice and CE.

You have a point, but how come schools like BU, TUFTS, and especially USC allow students to place them? A faculty is always there to guide you during the procedure, but the student places the implant.
 
You have a point, but how come schools like BU, TUFTS, and especially USC allow students to place them? A faculty is always there to guide you during the procedure, but the student places the implant.

Come on now...

Because a faculty is there to ensure safety, guidance, and they have done is many times.

When you are in private practice and your license is your livelihood, one perf through the buccal bone, uncontrolled bleeding, bad implant placement leading to early failure, nerve damage through incorrect implacement, sinus perforation through incorrect placement and or implant placement leading to loss of adjacent tooth basically means a big ass lawsuit. There isn't anyone to bail you out.

When the jury or board asks you how much experience you have in a deposition and you say " I did 2-3 in school " and the expert witness is a board certified oral surgeon diplomat with thousands of hours of facial reconstruction and thousands of implant placements... good luck with that answer.

Now if you want to take that risk as a new grad...thats fine. It's your license. A filling and crown is straightforward. Implants aren't. If you are truely interested in it, I suggest a heavy GPR and or very very very good CE once you are comfortable with surgery.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You have a point, but how come schools like BU, TUFTS, and especially USC allow students to place them? A faculty is always there to guide you during the procedure, but the student places the implant.

Placing 1 or 2 or even 3 implants under faculty supervision holding your hand is nowhere near enough. Also this is very rare and very few people actually get to do this. Spoke to a few faculty at NYU I know personally. Majority of students do not place implants.
 
You have a point, but how come schools like BU, TUFTS, and especially USC allow students to place them? A faculty is always there to guide you during the procedure, but the student places the implant.

MWU AZ students place more than 15 implants but is the tuition worth it is the question.
 
Hello everyone! Does anyone know if students are allowed to place implants at NYU? During my interview, the tour guide was saying that students are allowed to restore them but she didn't know anything about placing them. I want to be exposed to placing an implant at least once in dental school because that is where the future of dentistry is going and I want to know whether or not I would like to place them in the future when I practice. Any other insight on implants is also appreciated!!

Placing an implant is not that hard. If you can place a post inside a canal, you can place an implant. There are systems out there that make moderately difficult cases idiot-proof. Immediate placement seemed intimidating at first, but I realized that it was easier because I see how long the roots were, how far I can engage apically, how much interseptal bone/walls remain, and whether I can place or abort/graft. Using a CT and surgical guide makes implant placement a lot more predictable. If you need to do ridge expansion and indirect sinus lifts, look into the versah bur system. One of my first cases, I was able to place a multiple 3mm implants into a 2mm ridge and do my first indirect lifts without any problems and great primary stability. If you don't know how to flap and don't really want to (or know how to) flap, you want to look into flapless guided surgery until you learn how to flap.

I wouldn't let people scare you into thinking you're going to get sued if you don't place an implant "correctly". When the OS/perio doesn't place the implant ideally, I already know what the answer is going to be: I placed the implant where the bone was at. I don't tell the patient it's horribly placed, I just mention that restoring the implant is a bit of a challenge. That's one of the reasons I wanted to start placing my own implants... to get the best restorative results. Only one that is really bad is if you cause nerve damage or if you end up with the implant in the sinus (and if you have a good relationship with the OS/ENT, they'll bail you out). Otherwise, the other complications are not severe enough to lead to a lawsuit. I've seen a lot of doctors drill into the root or pdl space of the adjacent tooth... no lawsuits but they often do the endo or extract the tooth and put in another implant for the patient. If you perf, flap it open, clean, debride, add MFDB + membrane and PGA suture.

If you do your due diligence, perform at a high level of care (have a CT, have a plan, have a surgical guide, good informed consent, and demonstrate good intentions and follow up), even if you completely screw up, you won't lose your license. You might be forced to pay a fine, pay the patient back and take additional CE courses, but you won't lose your license.

Edit: Youtube is a very helpful tool for newbie surgeons. Watch, learn, perform.
 
I don't know. I'm one of those dentists that feels that placing implants is a specialized procedure. Sure .... as a GP .... many can and do place implants. But I feel patients with higher dental IQs are aware that placing an implant is a specialized procedure. Do I ask my PCP (primary care MD) to do my rhinoplasty? I'm sure he could perform one watching youtube, but come on.

Plenty of implant centers here in Phx. Not saying they're good or bad, but most have a prosth and OS working together to place the implants and restoration. If I was a patient that researches my medical and dental procedures .... would I really consider a GP who placed a few implants in school, or had some CE, or watched youtube videos with 5g cabability?

During my private practice days .... I knew of only 1 or 2 GPs that I worked with that placed implants. I'm sure there were others, but not a majority. Work Corp now. How many Corp GPs at my large Corp place implants? ZERO. Perio and OMFS place all the implants. That may change, but for now ..... ZERO. And we treat patients with lower dental IQs. Those that probably wouldn't know the difference.

Pretty sure GPs placing implants is not mainstream. If it was .... ALL DS would be teaching this procedure on a full scale level. Not sure that is the case.
 
I don't know. I'm one of those dentists that feels that placing implants is a specialized procedure. Sure .... as a GP .... many can and do place implants. But I feel patients with higher dental IQs are aware that placing an implant is a specialized procedure. Do I ask my PCP (primary care MD) to do my rhinoplasty? I'm sure he could perform one watching youtube, but come on.

Plenty of implant centers here in Phx. Not saying they're good or bad, but most have a prosth and OS working together to place the implants and restoration. If I was a patient that researches my medical and dental procedures .... would I really consider a GP who placed a few implants in school, or had some CE, or watched youtube videos with 5g cabability?

During my private practice days .... I knew of only 1 or 2 GPs that I worked with that placed implants. I'm sure there were others, but not a majority. Work Corp now. How many Corp GPs at my large Corp place implants? ZERO. Perio and OMFS place all the implants. That may change, but for now ..... ZERO. And we treat patients with lower dental IQs. Those that probably wouldn't know the difference.

Pretty sure GPs placing implants is not mainstream. If it was .... ALL DS would be teaching this procedure on a full scale level. Not sure that is the case.

As technology improves and gets cheaper more and more GPs will place implants. A 3D printer and printed surgical guides was all it took for my GP to become more comfortable.

Depending on your patient demographics or location as well it makes less sense to refer them to someone who will do the same thing for a higher cost.

Most predental students I know don’t see implant placement as a specialists job and look forward to it themselves.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
With a CBCT and surgical guide, part of me wonders if most simple implants aren't idiot proof. Now if you are doing major work, say an overdenture(implants + denture) that's when the restorations get really complicated, stick with simple implants, then move to implant stabilized bridges then work your way up. Besides, there is always something called malpractice insurance. I'm not saying just jump in bc you have insurance, just know where your limits are, plan extremely well with every case, refer out until you have enough CE to comfortably place the more complicated cases.
 
As stated before, you are free to do whatever you want with your license. At the end of the day, you are held to the standard of a specialist.

Most GP's can barely do a surgical or wisdoms with ease...and they want to jump into implants. Slow down young buck. Get your ABC's first before going to the XYZ's.

If you have the stomach for more risky procedures more power to you.
 
As technology improves and gets cheaper more and more GPs will place implants.

Most predental students I know don’t see implant placement as a specialists job and look forward to it themselves.

Advanced technology does not necessarily equate to quality treatment.

If most predents don't see this as a specialized procedure ...then why isn't implant placement part of EVERY DS curriculum?
 
I don't know. I'm one of those dentists that feels that placing implants is a specialized procedure. Sure .... as a GP .... many can and do place implants. But I feel patients with higher dental IQs are aware that placing an implant is a specialized procedure. Do I ask my PCP (primary care MD) to do my rhinoplasty? I'm sure he could perform one watching youtube, but come on.

Plenty of implant centers here in Phx. Not saying they're good or bad, but most have a prosth and OS working together to place the implants and restoration. If I was a patient that researches my medical and dental procedures .... would I really consider a GP who placed a few implants in school, or had some CE, or watched youtube videos with 5g cabability?

During my private practice days .... I knew of only 1 or 2 GPs that I worked with that placed implants. I'm sure there were others, but not a majority. Work Corp now. How many Corp GPs at my large Corp place implants? ZERO. Perio and OMFS place all the implants. That may change, but for now ..... ZERO. And we treat patients with lower dental IQs. Those that probably wouldn't know the difference.

Pretty sure GPs placing implants is not mainstream. If it was .... ALL DS would be teaching this procedure on a full scale level. Not sure that is the case.

GP's placing implants is very mainstream these days. What used to be reserved to the specialists, companies are now opening up to the GP's to unlock the commoditization of dental implants. Go to ktown in DTLA... 999 implant abutment and crown. If you had a patient who was picky enough to demand a specialist, they are probably the ones that should've seen a specialist to begin with, as they tend to be more exacting and picky as hell.

When rolling out a new procedure, patients are not skeptical, but actually excited when you're going to offer something new. I tell patients, we're about to start offering a new procedure in the office, we're implementing the technology to get better results and make the procedure less invasive. When you offer it like that with a lot of positive energy and excitement, the patient can't help but want to sign up for the procedure... and when the patient thanks you for having the best dental experience, that's internal marketing you can't put a price on.

Advanced technology does not necessarily equate to quality treatment.

If most predents don't see this as a specialized procedure ...then why isn't implant placement part of EVERY DS curriculum?

Advanced technology can make treatment faster and more predictable.

Implant placement is not part of every DS curriculum because the specialties are waging a turf war within their own DS academic departments. I've seen it... perio vs OS vs "implant department" vs prosth, and now endo. Like how orthodontists can be defensive of their own turf in dental school, the same division exists in the placement of implants. Take it from a GP that has had no formal training/residency in implants... it's not that difficult.
 
The rise of nerve injuries due to implants has increased tremendously as well as root canal retreats. For the sake of money more and more GPs are putting their patients at risk to pay off loans. Really sad to be honest.

Yeah do risky procedures cause “the specialist will bail us out heh!”. That is a terrible mindset.
 
Any procedure has risk. If you are completely risk averse, send every case out to the specialist. If you understand basic anatomy, you can avoid nerve injuries. When in doubt, take a CT (although you should always be taking a CT on almost every implant case). Don't have a CT? Use one of these: MagiCalibrator You will be able to know the magnification of your panoramic and the vertical distance to vital structures. Then all you have to worry about is the horizontal dimension. If you flap, you can see everything. If you don't flap, then use calipers to measure the ridge width.

Nerve injuries with implant placement are mostly due to negligence. Even if you were doing the osteotomy blindly (without radiographs or anything), you can definitely feel the difference between drilling into bone and the increasing density of bone as you approach the sinus or superior border of the IA. With wisdom teeth, nerve damage can happen even with the best surgeons. Specialists are there to bail us out from time to time (not every time). It's a give and take relationship. If you do these procedures, learn how to fix them if you mess up AND learn how not to mess up next time. That's what it means to be a doctor. To understand what you're doing and why you're doing it. Otherwise, you can just think of yourself as a tooth monkey.
 
Last edited:
Hoping not to sidetrack this thread more so. Hopefully the OP has some answers to his original post and sees the reality of dental politics of this implant issue. It is a hot issue now with who is qualified to place implants. I mean even the endos want a part of this.

I do agree with @TanMan. GP implant placement is becoming more and more common. This is not going to change. There are many talented GPs out there that have a wonderful relationship with their patients. Yes ... their patients would be excited that their trusted GP can perform a new procedure i.e implants, Invisalyn, etc.

Technology makes things simple and more predictable, but it also allows lesser trained and less experienced players into the field. Technology itself cannot replace experience and training. With all the new technology and GPs wanting to incorporate new procedures into the office .... I'm willing to bet that the overall quality of ALL "so-called specialty procedures" has gone down when you take into acct that these procedures were once done soley by experienced specialists. Not up. The patients are the ones that lose ... cause they just don't know any better.

Not trying to turn this into a GP vs. Specialist thread .... since ...as an ortho .... I don't have any skin in the game. Although .... wait a minute. Orthos place plenty of TADs. Tiny implants. Maybe orthos should join the party? 🙂
 
Hello everyone! Does anyone know if students are allowed to place implants at NYU? During my interview, the tour guide was saying that students are allowed to restore them but she didn't know anything about placing them. I want to be exposed to placing an implant at least once in dental school because that is where the future of dentistry is going and I want to know whether or not I would like to place them in the future when I practice. Any other insight on implants is also appreciated!!

On another note, you should be able to place or fix a tooth at any stage of the site's life... from needing a filling to an rctbucrown to extracting and placing an implant immediately or graft/wait. Advances in grafting materials makes grafting supereasy and cheap these days (2-3 mins max). Augma Biomaterials makes Bond Apatite which makes buccal plate fenestrations/fractures after ext pretty easy to fix or Osteogen Plugs that's literally pushed into the socket and sutured. Vertical augmentations are not predictable, so learn short implants too.

Instead of focusing on implants, learn to fix the tooth (or lack thereof) every step of the way, from filling to crown/rctbucrown to implants.
 
Hello everyone! Does anyone know if students are allowed to place implants at NYU? During my interview, the tour guide was saying that students are allowed to restore them but she didn't know anything about placing them. I want to be exposed to placing an implant at least once in dental school because that is where the future of dentistry is going and I want to know whether or not I would like to place them in the future when I practice. Any other insight on implants is also appreciated!!

At NYU, if you are in the implant or perio honors programs in D4, you are allowed to place implants, but you have to find the patients yourself. Every student has to restore at least one implant, but students not in the aforementioned programs are not allowed to place implants. There are 400 students per year ... allowing them ALL to place implants would be madness.
Personally, I hope to attend an as implant-heavy GPR as I can to learn more about placing implants and incorporate it into my working skill set.
 
I will chime in that I am wholeheartedly against teaching implant placement to dental students as a tool they can use upon graduation. Here is my reasoning:
1. Although it is fairly easy to place implants in 30 and 19 spots, everywhere else can be problematic. 2nd molar region requires the patient to be open very wide for a long time to fit that large drill in to make the osteotomy, which is where conscious sedation (a tool most graduating DS students do not have)comes in.
2. Easy sinus lifts are no longer easy if the sinus membrane perfs (do enough and it happens). GP's are not trained to do lateral windows, and evacuation of a sinus can be tricky...best left to OMFS
3. Bone grafting to augment buccal plate in anterior aesthetic zone is a true art. Done incorrectly, you will loose 1-2mm of verical height and may not get the desired buccal plate enhancement to boot. Well trained periodontists who do this all the time get excellent results, making restoration a breeze.
4. High quality grafting material, membranes, BMP, are all quite expensive to have lying around, and are perishable. If you are not using the material on a very regular basis, it gets thrown away.
5. While I do see the validity of having a CBCT in a GP office, it is an expensive item.
6. Not all implants are the same, and discount items may not have the same integration success as name brand, the coating being a major factor.
7. Long term sucess of implants is the goal, and until you have seen the 10 year success rate of your own surgeries, you will not know what your perimplantitis/perimucositis rate may be. Many factors go into this morbidity.
8. Maintenace of the osteotomy drills is very important when placing implants. They need to be changed frequently and are expensive. More than a 557.
9. Patching buccal plates are not as easy as it appears, and if a fenestration occurs and threads are showing, this can be a real problem.
10. Implants in the aesthetic zone may often require connective tissue grafting to create a pleasing smile symmetry. Another perio procedure that I would not do from a youtube video.
11. Not all guides are created equally, and although they work the majoity of the time, there will be that moment when the CBCT did not detect fibrous tissue where it appeared there was bone, and the guide becomes useless. The experienced operator knows what to do. The inexperienced may not even recognize a problem.

In the end, GP dentists have so many procedures they can do, that implant placement seems like just another skill that is not really necessary. $999 for an implant and crown seems not only ridiculously low for the procedure, but is a cautionary tale to new doctors. When we undercut eachother by providing discount services with cheap, less than optimal armementarium, we are not creating more access, simply diminishing our own worth. Even the best products under optimal conditions fail, we are after all working on people who are not perfect. Why take chances with shortcuts and products which may be suspect. My respect to TanMan, who once again has proven to be a super dentist with all the answers and no failures. I am sure we all aspire to those lofty regions.
 
Schools that are forward thinking will be teaching implants early on as well as digital technology (some have started teaching it starting from their first year). Those that are fighting change maybe won’t. School curriculums are very slow to adopt changes in the real market. There’s a lot that goes on behind the scenes to make these changes and cannot keep up with the pace of technology and innovation.

Old school dentists who became savvy at implants through GPR or Periodontists will argue against teaching implants in school like old school Orthodontists fighting against Smile-direct and teaching Ortho in regular dental school. <—— This is me repeating what Oral Surgeons, Ortho, and a Perio told me.

You are right, the future is in implants and GPs that can provide a wide array of services. You still need specialists to take on those complex cases that are not worth the risk. Don’t ever do anything that you’re not 100% confident in performing.
 
I will chime in that I am wholeheartedly against teaching implant placement to dental students as a tool they can use upon graduation. Here is my reasoning:
1. Although it is fairly easy to place implants in 30 and 19 spots, everywhere else can be problematic. 2nd molar region requires the patient to be open very wide for a long time to fit that large drill in to make the osteotomy, which is where conscious sedation (a tool most graduating DS students do not have)comes in.
2. Easy sinus lifts are no longer easy if the sinus membrane perfs (do enough and it happens). GP's are not trained to do lateral windows, and evacuation of a sinus can be tricky...best left to OMFS
3. Bone grafting to augment buccal plate in anterior aesthetic zone is a true art. Done incorrectly, you will loose 1-2mm of verical height and may not get the desired buccal plate enhancement to boot. Well trained periodontists who do this all the time get excellent results, making restoration a breeze.
4. High quality grafting material, membranes, BMP, are all quite expensive to have lying around, and are perishable. If you are not using the material on a very regular basis, it gets thrown away.
5. While I do see the validity of having a CBCT in a GP office, it is an expensive item.
6. Not all implants are the same, and discount items may not have the same integration success as name brand, the coating being a major factor.
7. Long term sucess of implants is the goal, and until you have seen the 10 year success rate of your own surgeries, you will not know what your perimplantitis/perimucositis rate may be. Many factors go into this morbidity.
8. Maintenace of the osteotomy drills is very important when placing implants. They need to be changed frequently and are expensive. More than a 557.
9. Patching buccal plates are not as easy as it appears, and if a fenestration occurs and threads are showing, this can be a real problem.
10. Implants in the aesthetic zone may often require connective tissue grafting to create a pleasing smile symmetry. Another perio procedure that I would not do from a youtube video.
11. Not all guides are created equally, and although they work the majoity of the time, there will be that moment when the CBCT did not detect fibrous tissue where it appeared there was bone, and the guide becomes useless. The experienced operator knows what to do. The inexperienced may not even recognize a problem.

In the end, GP dentists have so many procedures they can do, that implant placement seems like just another skill that is not really necessary. $999 for an implant and crown seems not only ridiculously low for the procedure, but is a cautionary tale to new doctors. When we undercut eachother by providing discount services with cheap, less than optimal armementarium, we are not creating more access, simply diminishing our own worth. Even the best products under optimal conditions fail, we are after all working on people who are not perfect. Why take chances with shortcuts and products which may be suspect. My respect to TanMan, who once again has proven to be a super dentist with all the answers and no failures. I am sure we all aspire to those lofty regions.

Although you make many good points, I think it's naive to think that if you don't teach dental students certain skills, that they will refrain from performing the procedures. This is why I respect endodontics and their field. They aren't territorial like their specialist counterparts. And contrary to your sarcasm, I do have failures and I learn from my failures. As doctor(s), we should have sufficient knowledge base to draw upon to know what to do when we mess up. Otherwise, we are no more a doctor than a tooth monkey. As I've always said, you will have failures in your clinical career, and how you manage the patient and the failure is the most important aspect. Learning from those failures are key. When I focus on single tooth restorations, my failure is limited to that... single teeth. That's why I don't do all on X's and such, because I am managing my risk and failures. Fixing a whole mouth that's failing is a lot more time consuming than fixing a single tooth.

I'm going through some of your points to agree/disagree on them. While you do make a lot of good points, we do have different practice styles. I am a little more aggressive and you are a bit more conservative. I don't think there's a right and wrong way, but just different ways of practicing.

1. Although it is fairly easy to place implants in 30 and 19 spots, everywhere else can be problematic. 2nd molar region requires the patient to be open very wide for a long time to fit that large drill in to make the osteotomy, which is where conscious sedation (a tool most graduating DS students do not have)comes in.
This is true, not only that, you have to make sure you respect the lingual concavity of #18/31 and with the added bulk of a surgical guide, performing an osteotomy can be difficult. I use a side entry type of surgical guide to increase access, shorter drills, and improve irrigation. However, even if sedated, I think we still have to respect the patient's normal anatomical opening and not force your way open.
2. Easy sinus lifts are no longer easy if the sinus membrane perfs (do enough and it happens). GP's are not trained to do lateral windows, and evacuation of a sinus can be tricky...best left to OMFS
This is where a guide helps tremendously. Indirect sinus lifts are relatively easy and the versah bur system helps make indirect lifts very easy. Basic surgical skills of sinus perf during an indirect lift are critical and identifying a perf vs lift.
3. Bone grafting to augment buccal plate in anterior aesthetic zone is a true art. Done incorrectly, you will loose 1-2mm of verical height and may not get the desired buccal plate enhancement to boot. Well trained periodontists who do this all the time get excellent results, making restoration a breeze.
Pick your battles. If it requires a soft tissue grafting/keratinized tissue, leave it to perio. As a GP, we should be doing easy cases, not difficult/time consuming cases.
4. High quality grafting material, membranes, BMP, are all quite expensive to have lying around, and are perishable. If you are not using the material on a very regular basis, it gets thrown away.
What you're describing is essentially inventory management. Any office should be doing this anyway. Buy enough so that you can get volume discounts when applicable based on expiration dates, but not so much that you end up having to throw out material.
5. While I do see the validity of having a CBCT in a GP office, it is an expensive item.
Expensive, but an important tool for a GP that wants to place implants seamlessly. You could always do a flap when in doubt, but if you're trying to go flapless, CBCT is important.
6. Not all implants are the same, and discount items may not have the same integration success as name brand, the coating being a major factor.
This is definitely true. I use certain implants for certain sites. My favorite so far are the biohorizons laser-lok 3.0. Not all implants are made the same, and some are better than others, even within different implant lines. For example, I see consistent bone loss on the nobel replace select tri-lobes over a period of a few years, whereas I see much better results with the nobel replace conical connections.
7. Long term sucess of implants is the goal, and until you have seen the 10 year success rate of your own surgeries, you will not know what your perimplantitis/perimucositis rate may be. Many factors go into this morbidity.
True. I haven't been practicing long enough to know the 10yr+ success rate of my implants. Am I going to be around that long? I'm not too sure. Is it realistic to expect dental work to last a lifetime? I don't think so. If nature couldn't get these teeth to last forever, what makes us think that manmade materials would do the same.
8. Maintenace of the osteotomy drills is very important when placing implants. They need to be changed frequently and are expensive. More than a 557.
Either use a new one each time or count how many times you use them before throwing them out. Once you feel a difference in cutting, toss them out. Same thing like burs. You want a nice cutting bur to reduce friction/heat generation. Instead of heating up the pulp, you're heating up the bone. I'm not sure how this is a point, this is something a regular gp can relate to.
9. Patching buccal plates are not as easy as it appears, and if a fenestration occurs and threads are showing, this can be a real problem.
Yes, it's annoyingly time consuming to do. Never happened to me yet, but this is where you should have good specialist connections to bail you out if you really need to. As I've outlined before, develop positive relationships with your specialists. Give them easy and hard cases. There are protocols to fix buccal fenestrations, I just haven't had a chance to fix one yet, nor would I want to fix someone else's implant problems.
10. Implants in the aesthetic zone may often require connective tissue grafting to create a pleasing smile symmetry. Another perio procedure that I would not do from a youtube video.
I definitely agree with this one. Leave perio surgery to the periodontists. Otherwise, you're going to have to depend on pink porcelain to try and manage the defect and the results are not all too great.
11. Not all guides are created equally, and although they work the majoity of the time, there will be that moment when the CBCT did not detect fibrous tissue where it appeared there was bone, and the guide becomes useless. The experienced operator knows what to do. The inexperienced may not even recognize a problem.
That's where tactile sensation comes into play, looking at what you're removing from your osteotomy, and the feel of the walls. This would all depend on the extent of the defect/lack of bone and where to go from there.

Edit: I forgot to address your last sentence. I don't have all the answers to every clinical problem. I have the answers on how to become a profitable GP that knows what cases to take on and which to pass on. Procedures fail and the single most important advice I have for aspiring dentists and dentists alike is how you talk to your patients. All your clinical skill does you no good if you don't know how to relate and talk to your patients. If patients love you, they'll stick with you through thick and thin, even with repeated failures.
 
So I suppose we will agree to disagree. Since I have seen the products from many D schools over the last decade or more, and have been responsible for teaching and working with them for a year, here is my take. The schools do a very poor job teaching basic dentistry, treatment planning, and patient management. Even after a year of practice, most of the residents are not capable of going out and functioning completely independently. I do not think they could run the business end of a practice and perform high quality clinical work...they would be overwhelmed, with a few exceptions. Those few who are conscientious about their work, and are good at planning and seeing all the angles, can work alone. This is about 20%. I guess my advice would be figure out who you are. Running a business, any business, is tough. Tack on treating patients, and it is quite a lot for a novice. Some of you can do it.
 
Top