NYU Emergency department VIP issues

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
My family experience was that these delays are real. Family member waited a long time for a cataract surgery. Had a complication that required reoperation and went to the back of the line and waited again. Getting him a cardiologist was also impossible and he obviously needed a pacemaker. He had plenty of money and could have driven an hour south and got it done but he had way too much pride in the superior Canadian system to consider that. So…not sure it’s all marketing and I only have anecdotes but I do have a few more about other relatives and cancer care delays etc.
I actually like the health system in Australia.

Everyone gets a public option insurance that is accepted at public hospitals and clinics. There is also private insurance available for purchase that can be used at Private hospitals and clinics.

Everybody gets baseline care, those that want more can purchase private insurance, or can receive it as a benefit from work.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
My family experience was that these delays are real. Family member waited a long time for a cataract surgery. Had a complication that required reoperation and went to the back of the line and waited again. Getting him a cardiologist was also impossible and he obviously needed a pacemaker. He had plenty of money and could have driven an hour south and got it done but he had way too much pride in the superior Canadian system to consider that. So…not sure it’s all marketing and I only have anecdotes but I do have a few more about other relatives and cancer care delays etc.

Canadian provinces set benchmarks for surgical wait times that is based on priority. In Ontario, a priority 4 is: ‘minimal risk of disease progression impacting morbidity/mortality’.

For priority 4 cataracts the average wait time from referral to clinical appointment is 92 days, and then on average another 133 days to have the the surgery. Total wait time for a priority 4 cataract surgery is 7.5 months.
Results for Surgery | Ontario Health

I’m not arguing that there aren’t serious wait times in Canada for certain surgeries compared to the U.S., but we also need to keep in mind that the U.S. spends more than double on healthcare per person compared to Canada, and not everyone is insured.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Canadian provinces set benchmarks for surgical wait times that is based on priority. In Ontario, a priority 4 is: ‘minimal risk of disease progression impacting morbidity/mortality’.

For priority 4 cataracts the average wait time from referral to clinical appointment is 92 days, and then on average another 133 days to have the the surgery. Total wait time for a priority 4 cataract surgery is 7.5 months.
Results for Surgery | Ontario Health

I’m not arguing that there aren’t serious wait times in Canada for certain surgeries compared to the U.S., but we also need to keep in mind that the U.S. spends more than double on healthcare per person compared to Canada, and not everyone is insured.

Yeah I mean who needs to see for half the year anyway?

Lol gtfo.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users
Members don't see this ad :)
If we want to compare the US to the Canadian healthcare system it's more intellectually honest to compare population-level health outcomes rather than anecdotes of our friends and family.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I actually like the health system in Australia.

Everyone gets a public option insurance that is accepted at public hospitals and clinics. There is also private insurance available for purchase that can be used at Private hospitals and clinics.

Everybody gets baseline care, those that want more can purchase private insurance, or can receive it as a benefit from work.
Though nice in theory, the data speaks otherwise and a two-tiered healthcare system increases wait times and cost - Australia is a case example of this.

A short article below.

"It is even sometimes perversely argued that if the wealthy pay for access outside the public health system, that reduces demand for public care, freeing up space for others and, hey presto, magically everyone benefits from the increase in inequality. The Australian experience is that this magic does not work."

 
I have no problem with large donors getting expedited care (skipping the 6 HR ER wait). They keep the wheels turning for the hospital.

I also have zero issue with physicians and nurses (plus friends and family) receiving the same. It's called professional courtesy, and all industries have it.

Caveat to both of the above is that it cant divert resources from sicker patients.

I do take issue with entitled non-contributing people such as board members, etc expecting this.

I also will not have my professional time managed by a nurse or admin. Yes, im aware that old lady donor Smith is in room 12. When I am caught up with my other tasks, I will see her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Though nice in theory, the data speaks otherwise and a two-tiered healthcare system increases wait times and cost - Australia is a case example of this.

A short article below.

"It is even sometimes perversely argued that if the wealthy pay for access outside the public health system, that reduces demand for public care, freeing up space for others and, hey presto, magically everyone benefits from the increase in inequality. The Australian experience is that this magic does not work."

Still an upgrade for the US.

It would be easier to possibly start than a Canadian system.

Don’t forget the rich in the Canadian system come to the US. Majority would not want this system in the US
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

For those without access, the actual complaint is also available from this Twitter feed (click to read the feed, then you'll see it stored in Dropbox):

This is insane. NYU sounds like a complete cesspool- it's bizarre they haven't fired half the defendants, it's going to cost them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
There is almost always more to the story than just a vip being unhappy. Let’s be real. I’ve pissed off a number of people in my day. Never once felt like my job was even remotely in jeopardy. Also with an SDG I know my people have my back. Your job prospects only get hurt in EM if you have an issue with your pd. The ceo of my current hospital and where I trained don’t know the names of any residents. Also never heard of a job saying hey I want to talk to the hospital ceo about you.
as a doc we have to understand the hospital ceo runs the show. If they want some idiot friend of theirs brought back go and do it. Recently, I took care of some vip at my hospital. Was fairly comical in its simplicity. Old rich white lady fell. Sent for a head Ct. i did my bit. Spent less than 2 mins in the room. Ct ordered. Plastics (who I don’t think I ever saw in the Ed) then shows to suture this old lady. She wasn’t the nicest. I didn’t care one bit. 2 mins of my time for a simple case. Patient was happy. As someone said above in a lot of ways these cases are the easiest.
imagine same old lady showing up with small facial lac and starting with the “I want to see a plastic surgeon”. That is the crap that used to really jack up my day. Here the lady gets what she wants. I get the RVUs for a simple and low risk case.

I can tell you that the descriptions in the article are true. Nyu epic shows at the top the patient's status "friend of the hospital (board of trustees)" or similar. Vip care is real. I believe it is unlikely that people who made it into one of the most competitive residencies at a time when interest in emergency medicine was at an all time high are unhireable by their own institution.

It hasn't been that long since nyu was fighting with its residents over hazard pay when the hospitals were literally overflowing with Covid patients. NYU Leadership Gaslights Residents Over Hazard Pay

Hospital went on a huge blitz against it.

They even went after a college student who wrote about the nyu residents
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I can tell you that the descriptions in the article are true. Nyu epic shows at the top the patient's status "friend of the hospital (board of trustees)" or similar. Vip care is real. I believe it is unlikely that people who made it into one of the most competitive residencies at a time when interest in emergency medicine was at an all time high are unhireable by their own institution.

It hasn't been that long since nyu was fighting with its residents over hazard pay when the hospitals were literally overflowing with Covid patients. NYU Leadership Gaslights Residents Over Hazard Pay

Hospital went on a huge blitz against it.

They even went after a college student who wrote about the nyu residents

Does anyone know what happened to Dr. Carmody? Has she found a job, any job?
 
Even if we adopted single payer as in Canada, does anyone truly believe that politicians, Hollywood stars, and VIPs wouldn't still get better and preferential care? The level of corruption at all levels of our society is unbelievable, and to think that politicians won't do what they always do is naive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
Single payer may exist for 80% who doesn't want to pay an extra dime but the other 20% will be under a better access/better care system. They will buy 3rd party insurance paying better than gov rates or go cash pay.

If we ever get to a single payer system, there will be lots of unintended consequences. People look at other countries and think we can replicate their system but we have a much different demographics.

I for sure would be part of the 20% with better healthcare and access. I am not waiting 12 months to get an MRI or see a specialists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Single payer may exist for 80% who doesn't want to pay an extra dime but the other 20% will be under a better access/better care system. They will buy 3rd party insurance paying better than gov rates or go cash pay.

If we ever get to a single payer system, there will be lots of unintended consequences. People look at other countries and think we can replicate their system but we have a much different demographics.

I for sure would be part of the 20% with better healthcare and access. I am not waiting 12 months to get an MRI or see a specialists.
I've always thought it's unfair to compare "health outcomes" in order to support single payer. America is the fattest, unhealthiest country on the planet. Legalization of marijuana is already leading to worse psychiatric outcomes and likely other issues related to chronic smoke inhalation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
What a ridiculous argument, it's not like cataracts pop up overnight and cause sudden blindness. Come back w/ an example of delays for actual time dependent conditions.
Agreed; there are a lot of issues w/ single-payor or gov't controlled care, but... I can't count the number of patients who I've seen in the past 1-2mo waiting 4-6mo just to get an appointment with a specialist (GI, Derm, Pulm) for CLEAR pathology who come to me out of frustration, worsening symptoms, fear, etc. This is in a state with rather excellent access to medicaid, and almost all of these patients are insured.

Insurance coverage, or lack thereof, is not analogous to actual access to care...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I've always thought it's unfair to compare "health outcomes" in order to support single payer. America is the fattest, unhealthiest country on the planet. Legalization of marijuana is already leading to worse psychiatric outcomes and likely other issues related to chronic smoke inhalation.
Health outcome is a metric full of junk data in. People harp on how bad the US outcome is, which is true in almost all metrics compared to say Japan, BUT they don't realize the terrible input.

If you look objectively at the data, the US has one of if not the best healthcare in the world. We have a top quarter outcome BUT have the bottom quarter obesity rate. Almost every other country with a bottom quarter obesity have a bottom quarter outcome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Agreed; there are a lot of issues w/ single-payor or gov't controlled care, but... I can't count the number of patients who I've seen in the past 1-2mo waiting 4-6mo just to get an appointment with a specialist (GI, Derm, Pulm) for CLEAR pathology who come to me out of frustration, worsening symptoms, fear, etc. This is in a state with rather excellent access to medicaid, and almost all of these patients are insured.
I believe Mass is the closest to universal healthcare we have and talking to a relative during Xmas they love it b.c everything is paid for and they understand it is at the costs of higher taxes. What does not bother them is waiting months to see a specialists or even their PCP. Screw that, give me what we have where I can go to see my PCP or UC/ER even if I have to pay more. I work hard to make alot of money, and will pay more just to see a doc asap just like everything else in life. I pay more to get a plumber to come at midnight.

Said relative had classic gout for 2 months, couldn't get an appt with the pcp until later January thus waiting 3 months for an appt. I prescribed some meds and now he is fine after 4 dys. Seriously, who wants to wait 3 months and suffer even if it likely would not have changed outcome.
 
Agreed; there are a lot of issues w/ single-payor or gov't controlled care, but... I can't count the number of patients who I've seen in the past 1-2mo waiting 4-6mo just to get an appointment with a specialist (GI, Derm, Pulm) for CLEAR pathology who come to me out of frustration, worsening symptoms, fear, etc. This is in a state with rather excellent access to medicaid, and almost all of these patients are insured.

Insurance coverage, or lack thereof, is not analogous to actual access to care...
Anecdotally I live in a large city in a non-expansion state but I was pleasantly surprised to discover that if you want a Derm appointment you can schedule one for next week (supposedly with the MD and not their PA).
 
If we want to compare the US to the Canadian healthcare system it's more intellectually honest to compare population-level health outcomes rather than anecdotes of our friends and family.

I think it's generally silly to compare population-level health outcomes between countries, as countries have their own set of morals, values, etc that are independent variables themselves. You can't control for that. For instance, an easy example: one cannot say America is worse off than country X when comparing gun-related deaths if country X doesn't have gun rights embedded in the constitution and 1.5 guns / person.

In general America has more money per capita than other countries so I expect us to spend more money on health care per capita (that being said we have an awfully inefficient system.)
 
I believe Mass is the closest to universal healthcare we have and talking to a relative during Xmas they love it b.c everything is paid for and they understand it is at the costs of higher taxes. What does not bother them is waiting months to see a specialists or even their PCP. Screw that, give me what we have where I can go to see my PCP or UC/ER even if I have to pay more. I work hard to make alot of money, and will pay more just to see a doc asap just like everything else in life. I pay more to get a plumber to come at midnight.

Said relative had classic gout for 2 months, couldn't get an appt with the pcp until later January thus waiting 3 months for an appt. I prescribed some meds and now he is fine after 4 dys. Seriously, who wants to wait 3 months and suffer even if it likely would not have changed outcome.

Your view is clearly tainted by your wealth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Health outcome is a metric full of junk data in. People harp on how bad the US outcome is, which is true in almost all metrics compared to say Japan, BUT they don't realize the terrible input.

If you look objectively at the data, the US has one of if not the best healthcare in the world. We have a top quarter outcome BUT have the bottom quarter obesity rate. Almost every other country with a bottom quarter obesity have a bottom quarter outcome.

I think you are confusing "best healthcare in the world" with "smartest doctors and the newest and brightest MRI machines and immunosuppressive therapy in the world". The latter we do have. However that doesn't itself make for a good health care system.

It's like a basketball team that has universally accepted fantastic players but somehow goes 40% win rate on the year. The team spent all that money for what? Winning 40% of the time?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Your view is clearly tainted by your wealth.
Absolutely. I don't apologize that due to my hard work, high income that allows me to have better access to healthcare. No different than I can stay at 5 star hotels rather than motel 6. Be honest with yourself, you and most everyone would do the same. Order that Pizza to be delivered and you essentially are tainted by some wealth.

I think you are confusing "best healthcare in the world" with "smartest doctors and the newest and brightest MRI machines and immunosuppressive therapy in the world". The latter we do have. However that doesn't itself make for a good health care system.
I will not argue who has the best healthcare as it becomes a circular argument with different subjective metrics. I would say that I would not trade our healthcare for any other country in the world even if it is the most expensive. So yes, from my POV, we have the best system.

Ask my friend who was in mexico, got into a bad car accident, and the ambulance came to take him to the hospital ONLY after he could pay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Anecdotally I live in a large city in a non-expansion state but I was pleasantly surprised to discover that if you want a Derm appointment you can schedule one for next week (supposedly with the MD and not their PA).
I too live in a non expansion state and I can make an appt with a Cardiologist, plastic surgeon, dermatologist in 1 week and get a nonemergent MRI in 2-3 dys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I too live in a non expansion state and I can make an appt with a Cardiologist, plastic surgeon, dermatologist in 1 week and get a nonemergent MRI in 2-3 dys.
If you know how to navigate the system, it's not unreasonable to find a specialist appointment within 2 weeks, and outpatient imaging in 1 week (just going through this the first time myself). Many patients can't or won't put in the effort to make the necessary calls and do the research to get taken care of in a timely manner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I think it's generally silly to compare population-level health outcomes between countries, as countries have their own set of morals, values, etc that are independent variables themselves. You can't control for that. For instance, an easy example: one cannot say America is worse off than country X when comparing gun-related deaths if country X doesn't have gun rights embedded in the constitution and 1.5 guns / person.

In general America has more money per capita than other countries so I expect us to spend more money on health care per capita (that being said we have an awfully inefficient system.)
I see your point, but Canada aligns pretty well with the US in demographics/culture/food. So, while any comparison is going to have these challenges, it's hard to find a better comparator to the US than Canada.

Now, if you want to say comparisons should never be drawn...then you need to scroll up in this thread and correct a few other posters ;)
 
I can tell you that the descriptions in the article are true. Nyu epic shows at the top the patient's status "friend of the hospital (board of trustees)" or similar. Vip care is real. I believe it is unlikely that people who made it into one of the most competitive residencies at a time when interest in emergency medicine was at an all time high are unhireable by their own institution.

It hasn't been that long since nyu was fighting with its residents over hazard pay when the hospitals were literally overflowing with Covid patients. NYU Leadership Gaslights Residents Over Hazard Pay

Hospital went on a huge blitz against it.

They even went after a college student who wrote about the nyu residents
That college student thing is insane. The letter written by the csuite to the student newspaper reads like a deranged egomaniacal tweet. But the craziest part is the brigading in the comment section by dozens of hospital admins of various stripes (lots of mds), all of whom formally sign their names and titles. There's are dozens there. They were clearly told to go comment on this article by NYU.... Wtf?
1. It's a student newspaper opinion piece. They have like 40 readers. Who cares? Why are you bullying an 18 year old?
2. Don't all these important "assistant chief of x" and "medical director of y" people have lots of important bs meetings and admin work to do?

Insane
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
If you know how to navigate the system, it's not unreasonable to find a specialist appointment within 2 weeks, and outpatient imaging in 1 week (just going through this the first time myself). Many patients can't or won't put in the effort to make the necessary calls and do the research to get taken care of in a timely manner.
I did not even have to make a phone call, there was an online scheduler. It took a similar level of effort to scheduling a hair cut tbh, and was definitely less complicated than ordering tickets to a baseball game.

I’m not claiming this is the norm or anything I just thought it was an interesting experience. I will say the only “trick” I used was looking for a private group rather than big medical system since I figured the private docs would be more motivated to see patients.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Absolutely. I don't apologize that due to my hard work, high income that allows me to have better access to healthcare. No different than I can stay at 5 star hotels rather than motel 6. Be honest with yourself, you and most everyone would do the same. Order that Pizza to be delivered and you essentially are tainted by some wealth.


I will not argue who has the best healthcare as it becomes a circular argument with different subjective metrics. I would say that I would not trade our healthcare for any other country in the world even if it is the most expensive. So yes, from my POV, we have the best system.

Ask my friend who was in mexico, got into a bad car accident, and the ambulance came to take him to the hospital ONLY after he could pay.
As others have pointed out, you confuse obtaining an MRI in 2-3 days as “better” healthcare, and now you confuse healthcare as a commodity such as purchasing your choice of hotels to stay in. A lack of access to healthcare has deadly consequences while choosing a hotel is irrelevant. A more apt comparison would be healthcare to safety. Why does the government spend money on police, firefighters etc? Society has a vested interest in the health of its citizens - sick individuals will lead to a sick society.
 
kty6c2aijjj71.jpg
 
Health outcome is a metric full of junk data in. People harp on how bad the US outcome is, which is true in almost all metrics compared to say Japan, BUT they don't realize the terrible input.

If you look objectively at the data, the US has one of if not the best healthcare in the world. We have a top quarter outcome BUT have the bottom quarter obesity rate. Almost every other country with a bottom quarter obesity have a bottom quarter outcome.
Can we separate obesity from healthcare outcomes? Maybe we should focus spending money on shutting down McDonalds at every corner
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Sometimes I think Americans deserve exactly the healthcare they get and voted for. As a European, I’ll just say that the attitude of a European person towards healthcare is vastly different. Yes, it is a basic human right but you also don’t go into a doctors office thinking you know better with a list of things and labs you want done and specialists you want to be referred to. And people don’t sue medical professionals just to get rich (well you can’t sue them at all; at most you can file a complaint with medical boards).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
I see your point, but Canada aligns pretty well with the US in demographics/culture/food. So, while any comparison is going to have these challenges, it's hard to find a better comparator to the US than Canada.

Now, if you want to say comparisons should never be drawn...then you need to scroll up in this thread and correct a few other posters ;)
Not as such.

USA obesity rate is 42%.

Canada obesity rate is 26%.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 5 users
And people don’t sue medical professionals just to get rich (well you can’t sue them at all; at most you can file a complaint with medical boards).
Do y’all not have a legion of lawyers ready to sue for financial gain? I think they are the real barrier to meaningful reform in the US because they have the most to lose from it. Then again it’s supposedly harder to sue a VA physician (government employed) so maybe it is just like that across the pond for every physician.

It’s an interesting thing. Whenever I have visited Europe there was no shortage of scammers/pick pockets etc. looking for a quick buck. I am envious in some ways but probably would not trade places overall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Do y’all not have a legion of lawyers ready to sue for financial gain? I think they are the real barrier to meaningful reform in the US because they have the most to lose from it. Then again it’s supposedly harder to sue a VA physician (government employed) so maybe it is just like that across the pond for every physician.

It’s an interesting thing. Whenever I have visited Europe there was no shortage of scammers/pick pockets etc. looking for a quick buck. I am envious in some ways but probably would not trade places overall.
I live in the US and have since as a teenager; however, the way things are going I would rather retire or move back to Europe sooner than later
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
If we want to compare the US to the Canadian healthcare system it's more intellectually honest to compare population-level health outcomes rather than anecdotes of our friends and family.
Outcomes vary based on baseline health. Reality is Americans are fat, smoking drinking and use lots of drugs. We are sedentary. Outcomes need to control for baseline health.

Comparing how long it takes for a procedure seems like a reasonable comparison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Outcomes vary based on baseline health. Reality is Americans are fat, smoking drinking and use lots of drugs. We are sedentary. Outcomes need to control for baseline health.

Comparing how long it takes for a procedure seems like a reasonable comparison.
An argument could be made that because Canadian healthcare is "free", Canadians are more likely to see a primary care physician regularly, which in itself influences the rates of obesity, smoking, and addiction.
 
An argument could be made that because Canadian healthcare is "free", Canadians are more likely to see a primary care physician regularly, which in itself influences the rates of obesity, smoking, and addiction.
Most annual visits in the US are also free. The system sucks though and frankly we are entitled so many don’t show up. I would also say I don’t think physicians influence obesity, smoking or addiction. People have to want to change. A doctor talking to someone about it imo has nearly no influence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I have been to Canada, Europe, and Asia. Just from an observational standpoint, there was not one country I visited that has the obesity level of the USA. It is not even close. Also there are no country in the world that I have visited with so many fast food places within a mile radius. Any medium size to large city, drive a mile down a main road and count how many fast food places you encounter.

There are some countries that everywhere I look, most people are fit. Yes, there are some people that are obese, but in general they all look healthy. They look similar to people I see when I go to my Gym. Overall, most are healthy and I bet you anything that people who regularly frequent the gym have much better health outcomes than the general US population.

Americans just want to find a quick fix without really looking at what the true problem is or blaming societal disparity for our unhealthy population. We can continue to look to other countries better metrics but can't see that our poor eating habits/easy access to food is what makes our system appear so broken. American's just love fast food, love giant portions, and love to eat throughout the day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
As others have pointed out, you confuse obtaining an MRI in 2-3 days as “better” healthcare, and now you confuse healthcare as a commodity such as purchasing your choice of hotels to stay in
You are mistaken. I never said an MRI in 2-3 dys is better healthcare but if your doctor wants to order an MRI and it takes 2 dys vs 12 months, then yes that is better healthcare. If you disagree, then next time you need to see a doctor or get labs/imaging, then just make an appt for 12 months.

Also healthcare is a right BUT also a commodity. Everyone in the US gets basic healthcare if they chose it but it does take alittle work. But the well connected/wealthy can buy better healthcare which makes it a commodity. If you disagree, then ask the NFL football player who gets an MRI the next day and then have the best surgeon/rehab that even I do not have access to. Is that fair? Prob not, but that's life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
In a theoretical thought exercise, if you got rid of all fast food joints and all hospitals at the same time, would you have better overall population health outcomes within 10 years?

America’s main health problem lies within the food industry and sedentary lifestyles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I actually like the health system in Australia.

Everyone gets a public option insurance that is accepted at public hospitals and clinics. There is also private insurance available for purchase that can be used at Private hospitals and clinics.

Everybody gets baseline care, those that want more can purchase private insurance, or can receive it as a benefit from work.
Does it cover 360 million people who are a heterogeneous population and all the immigrants too?
 
I don’t have any power nor do I seek any, and no one would give me any even if I wanted some - but I was in charge or I was a DA with political aspiration, this hospital would be shut down pending an investigation. I’d pull charts of every patient in the hospital while a VIP was in house and figure out any delays or care and any harm done and then start the massive lawsuits to set an example. Subpeona every text, every alert about VIPs etc. I don’t care who texts me, I’m not leaving a patient with a higher acuity to do some bull**** medicine on some VIP chump. I’d get happily fired for that but not without keeping a massive paper trail like hopefully many of these people did.

This is the stuff that makes people want to start a riot and hang the rich from the gallows.
 
Last edited:
I don’t have any power nor do I seek any, and no one would give me any even if I wanted some - but I was in charge or I was a DA with political aspiration, this hospital would be shut down pending an investigation. I’d pull charts of every patient in the hospital while a VIP was in house and figure out any delays or care and any harm done and then start the massive lawsuits to set an example. Subpeona every text, every alert about VIPs etc. I don’t care who texts me, I’m not leaving a patient with a higher acuity to do some bull**** medicine on some VIP chump. I’d get happily fired for that but not without keeping a massive paper trail like hopefully many of these people did.

This is the stuff that makes people want to start a riot and hang the rich from the gallows.
Nothing would help the community more than shutting down a hospital….
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users
Does it cover 360 million people who are a heterogeneous population and all the immigrants too?
Australia has 26 million people.

It does not but it could cover that many

Illegals would still not be covered
 
Australia has 26 million people.

It does not but it could cover that many

Illegals would still not be covered
An aspect of the Australia system that I like is how Medicare there works. For each CPT code (or their version of it), Medicare pays $X. You can charge above that rate and bill the patients for the difference.

Not sure if this translates to EM/inpatient though.
 
Nothing would help the community more than shutting down a hospital….
There’s enough hospitals in nyc to take care of the difference - and I’m sure the typical NYU langone patient won’t have any issues. They dump the people who actually need help on other hospitals anyway. Other hospitals would probably be more than fine taking more higher paying patients. This is Manhattan, not rural Iowa critical access hospital.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
NO, No there is not. NYC desperately needs more hospitals as the city outgrew its hospital structure. Closing a hospital does nothing to help a community.

I like the rest of your post. They should have substantial fines.
 
Not as such.

USA obesity rate is 42%.

Canada obesity rate is 26%.
Yeah, I think most Americans really don't realize how different Canadians are health-wise despite an overall similar culture.

The 500 lb landwhales that dot the American landscape riding around on their motorized scooters through Wal-Mart are essentially nonexistent north of the border.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
NO, No there is not. NYC desperately needs more hospitals as the city outgrew its hospital structure. Closing a hospital does nothing to help a community.

I like the rest of your post. They should have substantial fines.
Manhattan absolutely is not underserved. In the 5 mile stretch up and down the east side there are literally 4 quartenary care hospitals, including two Level 1 trauma centers.

The outer boroughs desperately need more hospitals. Manhattan having more trauma centers than the Bronx despite having less than half the penetrating trauma makes absolutely zero sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top