- Joined
- Apr 16, 2004
- Messages
- 4,661
- Reaction score
- 5,080
There was an excellent editorial in the Red Journal by Eli Glastein (U Penn) regarding the war of over technology and coroporate sponsorship.
Here's the back story:
Clifton Ling (originally MSKCC --> Varian) published an article claiming that Varian's RapidArc >> Tomotherapy.
Minesh Mehta (U Wisconsin, receives $$$ from Tomotherapy) published an editorial stating that Ling's study was deeply flawed. Among Mehta's arguments are that Ling " . . . acts as a corporate employee."
As Glastein points out however, Mehta is a paid consultant for Tomotherapy so . . . pot meet kettle. As trainees, Glastein writes, we should focus on actually treating our patients appropriately rather than arguing over technological minutae.
Here's the back story:
Clifton Ling (originally MSKCC --> Varian) published an article claiming that Varian's RapidArc >> Tomotherapy.
Minesh Mehta (U Wisconsin, receives $$$ from Tomotherapy) published an editorial stating that Ling's study was deeply flawed. Among Mehta's arguments are that Ling " . . . acts as a corporate employee."
As Glastein points out however, Mehta is a paid consultant for Tomotherapy so . . . pot meet kettle. As trainees, Glastein writes, we should focus on actually treating our patients appropriately rather than arguing over technological minutae.