-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
OC question from Bootcamp
Started by hope_to_match
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
https://www.khanacademy.org/science...opening-reactions-of-epoxides--acid-catalyzedHow come there is no inversion of configuration? Isn't this an Sn2 reaction? Thanks...
http://s1281.photobucket.com/user/E...nShot2013-09-10at40343PM_zps02d3653b.png.html
this doesnt answer my question. i know how to open the epoxide rings. i was confused about why there is no inversion.
Minion, hmm..isnt that a chiral center there?
Technically there is inversion around that carbon. If you check the rotation, the original compound is R and the correct answer in green is S which means that there is inversion (which is true for acid catalyzed epoxide ring opening). However if you see your answer and assign chirality you'll find that it is R like the original compound and thus did not invert. So the answer in green would be correct...super sneaky problem!
You might wanna double check with Ari about this though 😛
You might wanna double check with Ari about this though 😛
Technically there is inversion around that carbon. If you check the rotation, the original compound is R and the correct answer in green is S which means that there is inversion (which is true for acid catalyzed epoxide ring opening). However if you see your answer and assign chirality you'll find that it is R like the original compound and thus did not invert. So the answer in green would be correct...super sneaky problem!
You might wanna double check with Ari about this though 😛
👍 Always check the configurations, never assume how it's "supposed" to look.
👍 Always check the configurations, never assume how it's "supposed" to look.
yeah..that was my mistake! good quesiton though. i find it very simply and yet tricky!
