ochem destroyer # 28

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

jdent

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
340
Reaction score
1
1-methylcyclohexane treated with Br2 and hv gives 1-bromo, 1-methyl cyclohexane. This is what the destroyer says. Now shouldn't the methyl group be an o/p activator and make it either 1-bromo,2-methylcyclohexane or 1-Bromo,4-methyl cyclohexane?
 
1-methylcyclohexane treated with Br2 and hv gives 1-bromo, 1-methyl cyclohexane. This is what the destroyer says. Now shouldn't the methyl group be an o/p activator and make it either 1-bromo,2-methylcyclohexane or 1-Bromo,4-methyl cyclohexane?

Two things, firstly O/P activation is only by benzene not by cyclohexane. Secondly Br/Hv wouldnt add to benzene anyways it would add in the benzylic position. But you dont even have a benzene.
 
1-methylcyclohexane treated with Br2 and hv gives 1-bromo, 1-methyl cyclohexane. This is what the destroyer says. Now shouldn't the methyl group be an o/p activator and make it either 1-bromo,2-methylcyclohexane or 1-Bromo,4-methyl cyclohexane?

think about radical addition reactions and which radical is more stable, and of course we don't have benzene.
 
Top