Quantcast

Ochem question: stability vs reactivity

Get Shadowing and a Virtual Clinical Education
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

rmm30

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
276
Reaction score
1
i need some clarification on a topic thats been driving me crazy of late. Normally when a species is more stable it is less reactive. For example I- is more stale than F- because the size of Iodine ion is larger and can handle negative charge better stabilizing it and making it less reactive. However in the case of carbocations and radicals, tertiary radicals are more stable than methyl radicals due to hyperconjugation making them MORE reactive. why does stability correlate with reactivity differently in this case?
 

SN2ed

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
7,545
Reaction score
196
Thread moved. These types of questions belong in the Study Q&A forum.
 

shffl

Full Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2010
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Tertiary radicals have methyl groups that act as electron donors to somewhat stabilize it where as methyl radical does not. Therefore methyl radical is less stable and more reactive than tertiary radicals.
 

chemtopper

online organic/general chem/MCAT/DAT tutor
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
158
Reaction score
21
Carbocation and radicals are electron deficient species and anything which can donate electrons can stabilize it .Like in carbocations ,the positive charge on C BECOMES MORE STABLE if some electron donating group is bonded to that C and it becomes more reactive or less stable if some elctron withdrawing group is present next to positive carbon.
Alkayls groups are electron donating groups ,I am sure you know the reason .Now you can correlate how primary,sec,tert radicals and carbocations differ in stability and reactivity
 

Isoprop

Fascinating, tell me more
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
4,197
Reaction score
36
When an intermediate is more stable, it makes the overall reaction more reactive because it is easier to get to the intermediate. Strictly speaking, a tertiary radical is more stable and less reactive than a primary radical. But a reaction that has a tertiary radical intermediate is more likely to proceed than a reaction with a primary radical intermediate. This is best illustrated with energy diagrams.

You can think of the stability as "bait" in that it "lures" the reactant to proceed to product.
 
Top