- Joined
- Dec 8, 2007
- Messages
- 58
- Reaction score
- 1
Hey, this is from the ICC from TPR passage 9 of OCHEM question 8 for those of you who have the 2008 materials:
We are looking for the product formed by the thermodynamic enolate of 2-methyl-cyclohexanone rxted with D30+.
I would deprotonate the hydrogen adjacent to the carbonly that doesn't have the extra methyl group because this would lead to the more stable enolate, there would be no inductive effect from the methyl group. BUT, the answer they have deprotonated the hydrogen from the carbon with the methyl group. Is this because they threw the word thermodynamic in there? Are they trying to show that the Zaitsev alkene would be favored even though there is an inductive effect destabilizing the enolate? I hope i didn't confuse everybody!
We are looking for the product formed by the thermodynamic enolate of 2-methyl-cyclohexanone rxted with D30+.
I would deprotonate the hydrogen adjacent to the carbonly that doesn't have the extra methyl group because this would lead to the more stable enolate, there would be no inductive effect from the methyl group. BUT, the answer they have deprotonated the hydrogen from the carbon with the methyl group. Is this because they threw the word thermodynamic in there? Are they trying to show that the Zaitsev alkene would be favored even though there is an inductive effect destabilizing the enolate? I hope i didn't confuse everybody!