# of publications looks fishy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted1133976
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

deleted1133976

Hi everyone. I'd like to preface this by saying I am NOT trying to boast or be one of those people that asks for help and pretends to be innocent just to hear praise.

I have been in an extremely blessed situation these last few years of undergrad where I was able to join a fantastic research lab at the school's associated med school (state school). The lab was run by a few MDs and a couple med students who were all super motivated and were extremely productive throughout their time at the lab. I have been lucky to join them during this time and they've been great mentors.

Because of how productive of a lab this has been, I am going to be applying next cycle with roughly 15 publications. The breakdown is 4 basic science papers (3rd/4th author on these), 8 clinical papers (~3-4 1st authors, ~4-5 2nd/3rd/4th authors), and like 3-4 miscellaneous stuff like reviews, case-reports, etc (1st author - 4th author on these). In addition, I have about 8-9 abstracts.

Would ADCOMS think these numbers are artificial and inflated? I'm worried that ADCOMS would think that I just got my name added to these projects through connections or nepotism or whatever, which isn't true (don't even have any family in medicine).

Again, I am reiterating that I am extremely blessed to be in this position and that I don't mean any ill intent with this question. Please let me know if I'm overthinking this. Thank you so much for reading!
 
I applied this cycle as a senior in college with over 10 pubs (basic science and clinical), and have gotten interviews at Yale, Stanford, WashU and JHU... but research has never been part of the main talking points of any of my interviews. So I think they believe the pubs are earned, but I think above like a couple of pubs they don't really care and are looking at other factors of ur app (clinical, etc).
 
If multiple people are using the same account that is against our TOS... so please don't do that 🙂

Otherwise, if someone thinks it looks fishy they will ask you about your role on the projects. You need to have a good answer for what you specifically did for each publication--they won't ask you about each individual publication, but it wouldn't surprise me if you had someone ask you about 2-3 specific papers. If you can satisfy them that you know what you did then you'll be in the clear. Also, do have an answer for why you're not doing MSTP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top