- Joined
- Sep 21, 2010
- Messages
- 243
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello everyone. I am a second year who will write the exam in June 2011. Meanwhile let this be a good thread where everyone share their study progress and recent trend of the exam.
i hope it went well shemarty!!!
i still have 50% of gunner training flashcards to do, mostly basic sciences with most of the organ systems complete... im just freaking out that 4 weeks after classes end wont be enough but its all i got!! i wanna break 240 so badly.... gonna take a practice NBME right after classes end to see where i am.. which one do you guys think i should take? i only wanna take 2 NBME's and the 2 UWorld assessments.. should i change that? i was thinking NBME 6 and 7 should be best??
freakingggg outttttt ughhh i feel like its just not enough time!!
Wassup fam! It has been a long time! How is everybody? Well I too am on my step 1 grind. Im using FA, usmleRx, World, brs path and phys, and goljan audio. So we shall see what happens. I am taking my exam on June 13th. Ill be praying for everybody! God bless!
i hope it went well shemarty!!!
i still have 50% of gunner training flashcards to do, mostly basic sciences with most of the organ systems complete... im just freaking out that 4 weeks after classes end wont be enough but its all i got!! i wanna break 240 so badly.... gonna take a practice NBME right after classes end to see where i am.. which one do you guys think i should take? i only wanna take 2 NBME's and the 2 UWorld assessments.. should i change that? i was thinking NBME 6 and 7 should be best??
freakingggg outttttt ughhh i feel like its just not enough time!!
NBMEs are the best predictor. I took 5 because they only tell you what you missed on 6 and 7 so I wanted to save them for later. You don't need to see what you missed if you just are trying to set a baseline. Save 6 and 7 until you have some stuff memorized.
Is 5 free? I have a voucher for a test. Wondering which one to spend it on.. or does it not matter
sorry, whats the benefit? is the score report different than what you get with 6 and 7?
1. Is your school still a Kaplan teaching site
2.If so, are you taking it
history tells us NBME 6 and 7 are the best predictors.
I wouldnt do UWorld asssessments as they would give you a wrong picture of where you stand. past experiences tell us that they overestimate by at least 10 points. maybe thats because everyone adapts so much to the way UWorld asks questions.
I have a question for all of you. I have been doing a bunch of practice questions on USMLERx and noticed that on about 1/3 of the questions, the answer choices/concept tested are not found at all within First Aid. For example: vignette describes a condition associated with a drug side effect, I figure out what class of drug, but answer is the one example of this class that isn't in FA.
Does that mean they are low yield, or that FA is skipping over a lot of important stuff?
Also, does having a practice question on a concept/fact mean it is fair game, or are the test prep sites guessing just like I am about what is testable?
So far I have been trying to learn everything covered in the questions, but the list of things not in FA that are in this qbank is getting out of control and I am starting to wonder how important some of these seemingly nitpicky details are in terms of my performance on the real thing.
What did it show you when you clicked on the explanation. I have never seen a question on Rx that did not have a screen shot of the FA page in the explanation.
I have a question for all of you. I have been doing a bunch of practice questions on USMLERx and noticed that on about 1/3 of the questions, the answer choices/concept tested are not found at all within First Aid. For example: vignette describes a condition associated with a drug side effect, I figure out what class of drug, but answer is the one example of this class that isn't in FA.
Does that mean they are low yield, or that FA is skipping over a lot of important stuff?
Also, does having a practice question on a concept/fact mean it is fair game, or are the test prep sites guessing just like I am about what is testable?
So far I have been trying to learn everything covered in the questions, but the list of things not in FA that are in this qbank is getting out of control and I am starting to wonder how important some of these seemingly nitpicky details are in terms of my performance on the real thing.
i hope it went well shemarty!!!
i still have 50% of gunner training flashcards to do, mostly basic sciences with most of the organ systems complete... im just freaking out that 4 weeks after classes end wont be enough but its all i got!! i wanna break 240 so badly.... gonna take a practice NBME right after classes end to see where i am.. which one do you guys think i should take? i only wanna take 2 NBME's and the 2 UWorld assessments.. should i change that? i was thinking NBME 6 and 7 should be best??
freakingggg outttttt ughhh i feel like its just not enough time!!
did RR help you any??
Since we're on the topic of prep materials and their uses... how are you guys finding the correct sections in FA to annotate as you go through uworld?!
I liked the RR audio because sometimes its easier to remember stuff when somebody charismatically narrates a story about it.
The book -- I only speed-read half of it and skimmed the blue notes for the other half... I think all the factual info is also in FA, but I liked that RR had so many pictures, so I knew what stuff was supposed to look like.
shemarty, i need your smarts lol.
i cant believe i did so poorly on my first practice test. 390/198 on NBME 5... granted with pretty much zero board studying but i thought i would do better after seeing people get 490/220 on NBME 5 .... i am glad to have passed but i really want to break 240... i have 3 weeks of class and then 4 weeks of dedicated study time... i hope i can do it but i am definitely feeling a little down right now.. :'(
I think all the factual info is also in FA, but I liked that RR had so many pictures, so I knew what stuff was supposed to look like.
No way. There is a metric ton of stuff in Goljan RR that isn't in FA.
I know too many people with incredible step scores that are FA purists.
There is also info in Robbins that is not in Goljan. The point is that all the info worth learning is in FA, although clarification may be needed from other sources. I know too many people with incredible step scores that are FA purists.
How many FA runs did they do?
Since I started studying last week, I've just been going through FA and answering UW questions. I also took NBME 5. So far, I haven't seen a single question that I couldn't have answered if I had my FA open in front of me. I own Goljan RR, but I'm tossing around the idea of sticking with ONLY FA, UW, and maybe (big maybe) just flying through the RR blue margin notes. Goljan audio is a little out of date and a bit passive, so I don't plan on listening to any more of it (I did like 5 lectures). I'd love to hear others' opinions about this plan. FWIW I hit 220 (490) on NBME 5 at baseline (well, like 4-5 days into studying), and my goal is like 240+, so I don't think I have a huge gap to fill... hopefully lol. 10 weeks out from the beast!
out of date? just a little.
passive? I agree, some may disagree but I had a gap of 3 month between listening to the same lecture and I had forgotten most of it.
Im sure you will hit 240+ from your baseline and if you stick to your plan.
you are saying you could have answered most questions with FA and yet you got 220, am I right to assume that you get the big picture but need to fill in details??
Since I started studying last week, I've just been going through FA and answering UW questions. I also took NBME 5. So far, I haven't seen a single question that I couldn't have answered if I had my FA open in front of me. I own Goljan RR, but I'm tossing around the idea of sticking with ONLY FA, UW, and maybe (big maybe) just flying through the RR blue margin notes. Goljan audio is a little out of date...
Yeah, I've been wondering about this. I'm taking the Step on June 13th, and I do love Goljian but I wonder about how much I'm missing that's new and not covered on his audio. Thoughts?
Also, is it just me, or is USMLErx more diffcult (as in minuate focused) than uworld?
Are you reading his book? Everything is in there, he just elaborates on specific topics when he talks. So if you read his book you arent missing anything.
Thanks, Ry, BTW I love your avatar. I have been using his book with audio for topics covered during med school, but maybe I'll read through it now that you said that.
I'm starting DIT (video lectures) the first week of May, so any thoughts on what I should do now? They've been sending those question sets and I've done about half of them, but I kind of feel like the point of the question sets is to familiarize yourself with FA, so I'm thinking I'd rather spend the next month doing USMLEWorld on random and annotating into FA, and just blow off the question sets. Thoughts? Perhaps read through Goljian? I'm still in school for the next month, so I still have to pay attention and do well enough to pass our Hem/Onc block. 🙂
Thanks, Ry, BTW I love your avatar. I have been using his book with audio for topics covered during med school, but maybe I'll read through it now that you said that.
I'm starting DIT (video lectures) the first week of May, so any thoughts on what I should do now? They've been sending those question sets and I've done about half of them, but I kind of feel like the point of the question sets is to familiarize yourself with FA, so I'm thinking I'd rather spend the next month doing USMLEWorld on random and annotating into FA, and just blow off the question sets. Thoughts? Perhaps read through Goljian? I'm still in school for the next month, so I still have to pay attention and do well enough to pass our Hem/Onc block. 🙂
did RR help you any??
Hey guys,
So we were talking a bit on the last page about Goljian audio being a bit out of date... I noticed today that he mentions Robbins and Cotran, 6th Edition, which was published in 1997! Is Goljian audio this old? If so, is it really still accurate?
Also, is there any sort of audio from him floating around out there that is newer?
Thanks.
Hey guys,
So we were talking a bit on the last page about Goljian audio being a bit out of date... I noticed today that he mentions Robbins and Cotran, 6th Edition, which was published in 1997! Is Goljian audio this old? If so, is it really still accurate?
Also, is there any sort of audio from him floating around out there that is newer?
Thanks.