Official 2014 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I am planning to take the exam at the end of July.
I completed DIT, Annotated RX with FA, Annotated USMLE World with FA, First pass Kaplan Qbank
8 weeks dedicated plan :
Rx second Time 2 weeks
Usmle world 2nd Time 2 weeks
FA another pass 1 week
Last 3 weeks, NBME 7, 11, 13, 15, 16 and UWSA1&2 plus improving certain elements of different subjects
Also looking for Study Partner, If any body taking exam in July 3rd week, please PM me.
 
I wondered the same thing before starting so I'll tell you what I did in case it's helpful to you at all. I think whether or not you annotate into FA should come down to how well you know FA. Although there were some sections of FA I hadn't studied before I started UWorld, I felt familiar with a majority of the book so I decided to annotate separately. This saved me a lot of time (typing is > handwriting) and most importantly, if I were to look through my annotations, I'd have a really succinct list of topics that were personally high yield for me. Had I annotated into FA, I would have the benefit of having everything in context, but when I wanted to review, I'd have to go through all of FA to find my annotations. If you do your annotations in a different color I'm sure they'd be easy to find, but I just felt it was much more productive for me to have a list of notes all in one place that I could modify as I liked, add pictures from online etc. This is also probably because the idea of reading puts me to sleep.

On the other hand if you don't feel comfortable with FA then you should probably annotate into FA and revise your annotated copy as much as possible.

Thank you for the advice. You pointed out something I had not thought of before- being able to add pictures. That's really appealing to me so I think I'm going to do a word document.
 
So guys, I have a very simple question!

Every thing I have looked up says Ventilation in the lungs in greatest at the base of the lung. (FA, UWorld)

However, I keep reading from UWorld and other sources that Mycobacterium Tuberculosis prefers to reactive at the upperlobes of the lungs because there is greater ventilation in the upper lobes!

What am I missing!?!
 
So guys, I have a very simple question!

Every thing I have looked up says Ventilation in the lungs in greatest at the base of the lung. (FA, UWorld)

However, I keep reading from UWorld and other sources that Mycobacterium Tuberculosis prefers to reactive at the upperlobes of the lungs because there is greater ventilation in the upper lobes!

What am I missing!?!

TB is an obligate aerobe, so it likes the apex of the lungs.
 
Last edited:
Upper lungs: better ventilation
Lower lungs: better perfusion (think gravity).

TB is an obligate aerobe, so it likes the apex of the lungs.

Thanks for responding NeuroLAX.
FA seems to think that Both ventilation and perfusion are greater at the base of the lungs than at the apex of the lung. (FA 2013-pg 551; FA 2014-pg 600)
 
Ventilation and perfusion are BOTH greater at the base of the lung in standing position (due to effects of gravity). TB flourishes in the apex of the lung not because the apex has higher ventilation but because of the ventilation/perfusion ratio is higher at the apex. This means that there is a higher pO2 at the apex of the lungs then there is at the base.
 
Thanks for responding NeuroLAX.
FA seems to think that Both ventilation and perfusion are greater at the base of the lungs than at the apex of the lung. (FA 2013-pg 551; FA 2014-pg 600)

I see what you mean, so I should have phrased what I said differently and not used "better" when I meant to make a distinction between the V/Q at each location.

Apex of the lung: V/Q = 3.0
Base of the lung: V/Q = 0.6
 
Ventilation and perfusion are BOTH greater at the base of the lung in standing position (due to effects of gravity). TB flourishes in the apex of the lung not because the apex has higher ventilation but because of the ventilation/perfusion ratio is higher at the apex. This means that there is a higher pO2 at the apex of the lungs then there is at the base.
THank you so much EazyE1907! I wish I could send you money via the internet for saving me time! hahaha...Thank you!
 
THank you so much EazyE1907! I wish I could send you money via the internet for saving me time! hahaha...Thank you!
Thank you
I see what you mean, so I should have phrased what I said differently and not used "better" when I meant to make a distinction between the V/Q at each location.

Apex of the lung: V/Q = 3.0
Base of the lung: V/Q = 0.6

Thank you both...NeuroLAX too! I just barely saw your response. Thank you!
 
I am planning to take the exam at the end of July.
I completed DIT, Annotated RX with FA, Annotated USMLE World with FA, First pass Kaplan Qbank
8 weeks dedicated plan :
Rx second Time 2 weeks
Usmle world 2nd Time 2 weeks
FA another pass 1 week
Last 3 weeks, NBME 7, 11, 13, 15, 16 and UWSA1&2 plus improving certain elements of different subjects
Also looking for Study Partner, If any body taking exam in July 3rd week, please PM me.


I will be your study partner, skype?
 
Quick Q: Has anyone ever seen a question where they were tested on Ca2+/PO4/VitD/PTH levels in secondary hyperparathyroidism that was NOT due to chronic renal failure?

I reflexively say low Ca2+, high PO4, low VitD, and high PTH when I think 2* hyperparathyroidism, but I could imagine the following scenarios:
-Etiology = Hypocalcemia from chronic loop diuretic therapy: Low Ca2+, low PO4, normal/high VitD, high PTH
-Etiology = Hypovitaminosis D: Low Ca2+, low PO4, low VitD, high PTH
 
Last edited:
So guys, I have a very simple question!

Every thing I have looked up says Ventilation in the lungs in greatest at the base of the lung. (FA, UWorld)

However, I keep reading from UWorld and other sources that Mycobacterium Tuberculosis prefers to reactive at the upperlobes of the lungs because there is greater ventilation in the upper lobes!

What am I missing!?!

Are you sure you aren't confusing "ventilation" and "respiration"?

ventilation is merely flow of air

respiration is actual exchanges of gas between the blood and said air

(which is why the machine is called a ventilator, not a respirator... it moves the air for you, but doesn't actual do anything with it)
 
Last edited:
UW doubt-
Male experiences low grade fever, decreased urine output 1 wk after kidney transplant. Biopsy shows dense interstitial infiltrates of mononuclear cells. What is the mechanism ?

Its acute transplant rejection. But the options were is it B-cell or T-cell mediated ? FA says its both T and B cell mediated, while UW says its T-cell mediated.

Explanations anyone ?
 
Just took the 2014 Free 150, it predicted 10 points below the average of my last 3 NBME's using the MedFriends conversion...Ugh, scary. How reliable is MedFriends anyway? Seems pretty outdated.

I don't know how people say the Free 150 is so easy. It had the some of the most unfair/WTF questions I've seen.
 
Last edited:
hey kirbymester how much did u score on the FRED 2014 free 150,
I did it last week and scored 79% with 32 mistakes total
 
UW doubt-
Male experiences low grade fever, decreased urine output 1 wk after kidney transplant. Biopsy shows dense interstitial infiltrates of mononuclear cells. What is the mechanism ?

Its acute transplant rejection. But the options were is it B-cell or T-cell mediated ? FA says its both T and B cell mediated, while UW says its T-cell mediated.

Explanations anyone ?

UWorld just wants you to know that cellular immunity is most important in acute rejection, whereas humoral plays a more significant role in chronic. One of those "best answer of these" rather than "100% perfectly correct answer" questions.

hey kirbymester how much did u score on the FRED 2014 free 150,
I did it last week and scored 79% with 32 mistakes total

Hey, I got an 88%.
 
UWorld just wants you to know that cellular immunity is most important in acute rejection, whereas humoral plays a more significant role in chronic. One of those "best answer of these" rather than "100% perfectly correct answer" questions.



Hey, I got an 88%.
thanks !
 
I started my dedicated study period 2 weeks ago, and I have 4 weeks till exam day. I finished my first (cursory) pass of FA using DIT. I'm working through uworld (25% complete)/second FA pass right now. I've been scoring in the 70-80% range on most of the uworld randomized test blocks. I spend about 4 hours/day reviewing FA and 10 hours doing 3 blocks of uworld. Am I spending too much time on uworld? Should I spend more time reviewing FA?
 
Anyone use the separate First Aid organ systems and First Aid General Principles books along with their First Aid? I got them, but don't see much of a difference in content than what's already in First Aid, besides more pictures and details for each concept. Wondering how and if I should use them. Perhaps add the extra details from the books into the FA copy?
 
Haha - this will undoubtedly be long-winded, so brace yourself.

First off, I'm writing this first part prior to knowing my score (trying to eliminate any biases). I've worked very hard my first 2 years at a very good medical school (avg MCAT >35, GPA>3.7) - and have been doing around 1 SD above. I stress this because I believe the best thing anyone can do for their own step 1 studying is work very hard and diligently on the material presented during the first 2 years. There were things on NBMEs and Step 1 that I used knowledge from studying those first two years rather than my devoted study period.

I used 7 weeks of pure study time using a few resources, but drilling them in (Main ones were UWorld, First Aid, Pathoma with supplemental use of USMLE-Rx and Kaplan qBank)
7.5 Weeks Out (Baseline): UWSA 1 - 230
4.5 Weeks Out: NBME 13 - 245
4.5 Weeks Out: UWSA 2 - 260
3.5 Weeks Out: NBME 11 - 251
2.5 Weeks Out: NBME 12 - 262
1.5 Weeks Out: NBME 7 - 264
Last Week Out: Free 150 - 91%; NBME 16 - 254, NBME 15- 258

The Test: I felt like it most closely resembled the later NBMEs, and I came out feeling cautiously optimistic about it. However, as days passed, I remembered more questions and (unfortunately) looked them up - and I already know of a handful that I got wrong. As much as possible, resist the urge to look up answers - or at be at risk of losing your sanity.

I'm definitely a bit worried that I 'peaked' early - as the week before I was in the 260s, and my avg on my last 2 NBMEs was 256. I would be content with a 250+, but am secretly hoping that I might break the 260 barrier. I'll come back and edit this draft tomorrow when I know my score.
 
Last edited:
For all the normal people not scoring 220s and above before they start studying:

Pre-studying NBME given by school: 170
4 weeks out NBME12: 211 (this scared the heck out of me)
2.5 weeks out UWorld1: 230
2 weeks out NBME 15: 237
1 week out UWorld2: 254 (thought this test was easy with a generous curve, so i didn't read much into it)
4 days out NBME 16: 245

Actual: 241

hang in there, hard work pays off, if you keep working the scores will eventually keep going out
I used Pathoma, Uworld (68% 1st pass), FA, Microcards, Lippencott Pharm cards,Wikipedia...
 
great scores and great work up above! also i didn't read all the above, but Kirby, in regards to your q about HyperPTHism -- I recall a Uworld q that talked about malabsorption/fat soluble vitamin deficiency and how that would give dec'd ca, DEC'd Phosphate, and 2ndary hyperPTHism. I also have written in my notes that osteomalacia also cause DEC'd Phophate. Does this sound familiar?

Also I was wondering if people would agree with me that the NBME doesn't tend to test specifics WITHIN a drug class right? I mean, it would ask the diff btwn the diff anti-seizure meds but i get the impression i don't have to be so specific beyond FA b/c it wouldn't ask me to distinguish the diff btwn the diff. opoids for example (in terms of which is a better anti-cough, which is more constipating, etc.)? Maybe just wishful thinking? I"m just finding that I somehow wrote all this minutaie about pharm in my FA and want to cross it out haha
 
Step 1 = 239
Uworld timed random = 65%
USWA 2 ( 20days out) = 252
NBME 16 (15 days out)= 228
NBME 13 (10 days out) = 241
USWA 1 (5 days out) = 242
NBME 15 (2 days out) = 232

Just realised the average of all the practice tests I took is 239 :/.Overall I felt under prepared for the real thing and my performance was somewhat inconsistent during my prep. Still I was super positive on test day, slept 8 hours and kept my nerves in check. Walking out I felt I'd get a score in between a 230 and a 245 because I missed a few easy straight up recalls. For my prep I started off with goljan and FA system wise ending up FA and uworld with bits of Kaplan anatomy(which I felt was my weakness).

What would I have done differently? Started early, way early (IMG here in a 5 year program, there was a lot of material that I had to do from scratch). Not waste as much time as I did on biochemistry. Taken more NBMEs early on (I was kinda scared of them). Follow the study pattern I had planned out more strictly. Oh well..
 
Last edited:
Moved my date up 10 days. It's now June 9th.

Been maxed out for 8 weeks anyway.

You'll do great man. Take a day off to chill.

Wow. This forum continues to raise the bar! Congrats on everyone's scores. My eyes are literally like O_O. (I'm gonna apply for the match this year.....no way in f*ck am I waiting for you guys to show up with your scores.. hahaha)
 
Anyone use the separate First Aid organ systems and First Aid General Principles books along with their First Aid? I got them, but don't see much of a difference in content than what's already in First Aid, besides more pictures and details for each concept. Wondering how and if I should use them. Perhaps add the extra details from the books into the FA copy?
I skimmed these and found that they didn't add very much extra detail that would make them worthwhile. They're basically FA 2012/2013 with extra words. I think you'd be much better off focusing on Pathoma and qbanks to fill in knowledge gaps than those books. They're simply too big and don't add anything high yield you couldn't get from other, more established resources. I also mentioned their similarity to FA 2012/2013 in particular because FA 2014 is a vast improvement and contains a lot of extra material that I've seen show up in several questions. Spending more time with FA 2014 will make the organ systems and general principles books even more superfluous.

Of course, I got similar advice when I wondered the same thing a while back and wasn't totally satisfied until I had a look at them for myself. I borrowed a friend's copy to flip through so I would recommend the same. I will say that some people have found certain sections more useful than others, so maybe try a more selective read if you really want to do it. I'd also recommend searching for NickNaylor's review of the books, which he posted a while back. It's much more complete and he points out the specific sections he found useful.
 
Hardest thing I have ever taken. Seriously traumatized.

243/99.

Bottom half of top third of class, almost always 1SD above average, 34 MCAT, top 50
Studied 7 weeks in total.
Basic Science Exam: 197 (6 weeks out)
NBME 12 (4 weeks out), 13 (3 weeks out), 15 (2 weeks out): 237 (see a trend there? lol)
UsmleRx: 66% (completed 48% in first three weeks of prep)
UWorld: 75% (finished all of it in three weeks, with 30% in two days)

My biggest mistake was finishing UWorld because I never quite knew how to use it, and I never gained any headway with it. I just felt overwhelmed by it, and felt like it took my time away from studying from FA. Overall, highly recommend UsmleRx and I sort of wish I had just focused on that and done no more than a set of UWorld per day. However, satisfied overall. Was never planning on going into plastics anyway...lol.
 
Last edited:
great scores and great work up above! also i didn't read all the above, but Kirby, in regards to your q about HyperPTHism -- I recall a Uworld q that talked about malabsorption/fat soluble vitamin deficiency and how that would give dec'd ca, DEC'd Phosphate, and 2ndary hyperPTHism. I also have written in my notes that osteomalacia also cause DEC'd Phophate. Does this sound familiar?

That perfectly answers my question, thank you!

Also I was wondering if people would agree with me that the NBME doesn't tend to test specifics WITHIN a drug class right? I mean, it would ask the diff btwn the diff anti-seizure meds but i get the impression i don't have to be so specific beyond FA b/c it wouldn't ask me to distinguish the diff btwn the diff. opoids for example (in terms of which is a better anti-cough, which is more constipating, etc.)? Maybe just wishful thinking? I"m just finding that I somehow wrote all this minutaie about pharm in my FA and want to cross it out haha

Unfortunately, I've gotten multiple questions on that opioid example in specific. You definitely need to know that dextromethorphan is anti-tussive and diphenoxylate is anti-diarrheal -- it just might be less difficult than you're imagining (e.g. only 2 answer choices are opioids). Side effects unique to a drug within a class are very high-yield (e.g. clozapine and agranulocytosis), as are other unique things (nimodipine for subarachnoid hemorrhage).
 
If anyone was curious, I just did the 2014 pdf version of the Free 150 (not FRED) and the 2012 pdf version. The two pdf's had 62 questions identical with one another, leaving you with an NBME-esque 214 unique Q's between the two if you wanted to do two Free 150's. I can't comment on any other years besides 2012 and 2014.
 
Also I was wondering if people would agree with me that the NBME doesn't tend to test specifics WITHIN a drug class right? I mean, it would ask the diff btwn the diff anti-seizure meds but i get the impression i don't have to be so specific beyond FA b/c it wouldn't ask me to distinguish the diff btwn the diff. opoids for example (in terms of which is a better anti-cough, which is more constipating, etc.)? Maybe just wishful thinking? I"m just finding that I somehow wrote all this minutaie about pharm in my FA and want to cross it out haha
I agree with Kirby and I'll also add that the most detailed question I've seen requiring you to differentiate between drugs of the same class involved knowing the difference between short vs. long half-life benzos. This level of detail is in FA (triazolam, oxazepam and midazolam are the 3 short-acting benzos) but it might go overlooked. I've seen questions on this particular topic in Kaplan, USMLERx and UWorld so it seems to be quite important. Also note that UWorld wants you to know that alprazolam is another short-acting benzo.

For pharm I think the best advice would be to know everything in FA cold, and add in the few extra details that UWorld has. As a side note, USMLERx has a ton of pharm questions (including repeats testing the same topic) so if you need a good way to hammer in the FA pharm sections, that's a great option.
 
Step 1 score: 248, written April 2014
Uworld finished 1x + wrong answers: average over the last 400Qs = 84% (which is weird because based off all the calculations I've seen online, I should have scored higher)
FA: 1.5x
Time spent preparing: 2 months
Med School: Saba Univ School of Med (Caribbean)

First and foremost, I'd like to thank every forum poster out there. Whether its your questions, encouraging comments, personal experiences, or even clowning around, its this wonderful conversation that has created for such a great community. If I could honestly organize an event, I would want it for every contributor on these forum boards. You guys and girls are humane, driven, and care not only for yourselves but the entire field of medicine when you share. Thank you to everyone.

Experience: I remember flagging about 1/4 of the Qs on one block but on most others there were none or I had been able to unflag them all. not a terribly long day given the mental stamina should be developed by the time you write it. But i knew I was in trouble as soon as I walked out cause I didn't feel terrified but rather indifferent. I knew I had scored lower than I was capable of, but now that I have the score, I'll take it and move on. Looking back in retrospect, if there's one thing I wish I did, it would have to been to write an NBME in the last 10 days and focused on my 3 areas of weakness. To be honest, I probably dont even need the NBME since I could have predicted my weakest areas, based off my historical results.

Here's what I did:
1) Read FA 1.5x. First read, converted every list, group of facts, and anything else possible into a pneumonic so I could condense the entire book. This honestly was the best decision before anything else. It allowed me to save a TON of time. Second time, I read/group discussed select chapters that I was weak in.
2) Did uworld, random, timed, 3-4 blocks per day. Most time spent on studying the explanation, educational objective and MC wrong answer. If I had a section which was significantly weaker than the others, I would complete an entire block of Qs in that section.
3) NBMEs: when I wrote an NBME at my school I scored 237, after 2.5 months off I started at 200, then 220, then 238 (this was about 3 weeks before my exam). The importance of this is that you should begin studying for the Step IMMEDIATELY after you finish you school work.
4) Relax everyday. When the library closed (9pm), I stopped working. Except for maybe a few days when I worked until 12. This was a REALLY GOOD decision. I could see other students burning out all the time and each passing day would be less efficient since they were anxious, confused, slept poorly, mentally unhealthy. If I ever felt burnt out half way through the day, I would take the day off. I would rather loose half a day today, than an entire week ahead. This was my biggest advantage, if I ever felt overloaded with material and anxious beyond belief I was able to rapidly resolve it by having a study buddy to talk to, coming up with a plan, or putting the work away. And at the end of each day, I would always be doing anything unrelated. Most of the time it was just hanging out with my friends playing video games, poker, or having a beer. i.e.: Do not try and be a smart ass today, or you'll be a ******* tomorrow.
5) Don't get distracted by introducing major things in your life. This means starting new relationships (avoid Tinder and nightclubs like the plague), or taking on a major activity. Anything that can be considered a "new interest" is a bad idea. Reason being, is that your mind is always attracted to novel things, so you're gonna start spending a chunk of your time thinking about that and loose sight of the prize.
6) Listen to yourself. I've never been offered so much useless advice on anything else I've ever tried to accomplish in life. But that's okay, because everyone who shared was trying to help and I appreciate that before anything. I know some other people realize this too and am able to generally categorize the high from the low scorers on this quality. I've seen people from both categories use all the same resources (a whole lot of stuff, or just a few items) and score completely differently for 1 particular reason. Both got advice from others via forums and friends. But the high scorers designed their OWN study strategy. They listened to themselves and took a moment to realize their weaknesses and thought hard about how they improve their score. The reality is this: there is clear path to the high score you would like. It seems to be entirely variable based on your current knowledge, capacity to learn, and work ethic. This is what you have to realize, take a moment based off your performance in every course and med school and predict your strengths and weaknesses. Then write an NBME to not just see where you actually stand, but to SEE IF YOU ARE ABLE TO PREDICT YOUR PERFORMANCE. Be honest with yourself, because the step will be honest with you.
7) Google images is God. It will provide you the best tables and figures for understanding concepts.
8) Have a great breakfast. I have an awesome smoothie every morning which is easy to make, digests well and meets all my required nutrients. Essentially a good smoothie has a base (water is best), protein, fruits & veges, and an energy boost (caffiene).
9) Buy one of those 4-in-1 pens (red, blue, green, black). You're gonna realize how useful it is when you can categorize your notes by colour (green = mneumonics, red = clinical pres, blue + black = general info) and drawing schematics was super easy and a great way to summarize info.
10) I tried DIT and thought it was extraordinarily useless because it delivers all the content passively and the questions did not seem very useful for me. FA is a dense book which scares a lot of people and pushes them in directions not best for learning its material. Its ok. Understand that going through the book is a SLOW process the first time. I was reading like 10-15 pages a day on average. And would only have time to complete a block of Qs. Honestly, the best way to approach FA is with a pen in hand and an effort to understand first, then condense into a mneumonic. You'll find the 2nd read super fast if you do so cause every time you revisit FA to fill it out after uworld, or you do a uworld Q, the mneumonic comes to mind and EVERYTHING related to that topic is refreshed in your memory. Also about 1/3 of FA's mneumonics I scrapped and came up with even better ones. I suggest you design every mneumonic yourself. Its painfully slow, but not a day will go by wasted, which is extraordinarily efficient!


Here's what I suggest:
1) FA is a great text for every topic on the Step except Pathophys and Behav Sci. For pathophys, you can learn most of this from uWorld. However using Goljian to supplement your WEAK areas would be a great idea. (goljian is dense and reading it from front to back is passive learning and you'll forget most which is a HUGE waste of time; so to make it worth your while, focus on your weaknesses, because those "Ah Hah! Now I get it!" moments are the only scenarios of learning what you read).
2) USE Kaplan's 101 ethical scenarios (or whatever its called). I used this book in school and it helped me a lot and my friend suggested that I use it for the Step, but unfortunately I was tight on time. I should have re-prioritized my schedule and made this a top priority. This book + uworld will help. FA's examples are terrible at preparing you for these scenarios.
3) Use the Kaplan Qbank for molecular biology Qs. The Step had quite a few molecular bio Qs and I swear most my reasoning came from my undergrad specialization in the field. I honestly dont recall uWorld or FA preparing me well for this section.
4) Have a study partner whose aiming for the same score as you. Becareful surrounding yourself with lazy people, it will rub off onto you.
5) Complete uWorld in 2 parts. Not everyone has the time do it 2x or may not even be beneficial if you remember most answers. So what I suggest is you split the Qbank in half. First 1/2 of Qs, complete subject wise and read FA after each subject of Qs completed. Second half, complete random. This method will allow you exposure to the most recurring topics which should be the basis of your knowledge. And it will then allow you to expand with details.
6) Slice the binding off FA, then put the book into a binder. You can do this at Kinkos or related stores. The reason for this is so you can insert images or notes you find off google images. For me, visualizing the situation was my biggest advantage cause I could reason most Qs.
7) Exercise each day to ENJOY GOOD HEALTH. Don't try and become jacked if you currently aren't. That would be pursuing a new interest. All I'm saying is take 30mins in the morning to increase cerebral blood flow, maintain the tone of your muscles, and keep your immune system robust so your body doesn't become an excuse. I would honestly suggest taking a couple days to explore your options (checking out workout videos, trying an at home regime, nearby gym membership) cause this WILL impact your quality of life.

I wish you all the best with your road ahead.

Sincerely,
Jason
 
Ugghhhh

Took NBME 11 as a baseline two weeks ago with the rest of my class, got a 213

Took NBME 15 today
217

I have no idea how you geniuses get 250/260/etc. I just want to do good enough to go back to Ohio State, but I'm not even that far yet :/ 3 weeks to go...
 
Ugghhhh

Took NBME 11 as a baseline two weeks ago with the rest of my class, got a 213

Took NBME 15 today
217

I have no idea how you geniuses get 250/260/etc. I just want to do good enough to go back to Ohio State, but I'm not even that far yet :/ 3 weeks to go...


don't put unnecessary pressure on yourself by comparing to others and/or ruminating on what the outcome will be--it's unhealthy and counterproductive. Just force a smile, try your best and make sure you can look back on this dedicated period thinking "Well, I did everything I could."
 
Last edited:
congratulations to everyone that got their scores today. quick question, to all you Pathoma users out there. Has there been any significant update to the videos as far as content goes. Thanks!
 
I have a question about the NBMEs. What are they exactly? Questions from the real Step 1 in the past, sample questions produced by creators of Step 1, or something unrelated? If they are prior questions, about how old are they?

There are two curiosities, one is that if it's from the real Step 1 people, why is the interface (purportedly, I have not taken the exam yet) so different? It seems even UWorld gives a more accurate interface. Next is, if they are prior questions, what do people mean when they say the "real" test has much longer question stems? Why don't these questions reflect that?
 
Top