Official 2014 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Pharm- FA sufficient in this area? Trying to decide whether or not to delve into stacks of pharm cards or just stick to the "high yields."
 
Pharm- FA sufficient in this area? Trying to decide whether or not to delve into stacks of pharm cards or just stick to the "high yields."
I strongly believe pharm is sufficient with FA. there a couple extra in UW and that is more than enough. students go crazy with pharm--its a waste of time and money
 
I strongly believe pharm is sufficient with FA. there a couple extra in UW and that is more than enough. students go crazy with pharm--its a waste of time and money
i
Very true. I've yet to run across any crazy drugs in the CBSEs/NBMEs I've done. I'm sure I'll see something come test day that sticks out but I'll take your word for it and rely on pre-clinical coursework to bail me out. Much appreciated for the input.
 
Holy cowballs.

I was most worried about forgetting/missing things in FA on the real thing, and there were probably at least 10 questions I missed just from that. Easy points! Makes me kind of depressed thinking about it. Of course this is not including the non-FA stuff, of which there were plenty I missed/was unsure of. But it's these recall type of questions that are really frustrating to miss!

Well, in the spirit of SDN, here is my post game review as well as a few comments on things I was curious prior to taking it (plus I've always enjoyed reading about other people's post exam experiences, so here is mine!).

So first of all, yes, FA and UW will adequately prepare you for it, as much as you can prepare (which has a real limit, both in terms of time and mental capacity/willpower). That is, unless your name starts with a P, ends with an n, and rhymes with Boston. The rest really just comes from your experience in years 1+2. A lot of the tougher questions you will have to read between the lines to pick up on what they're talking about, and a few details I knew only because they were mentioned off-hand by an attending or lecturer. But these are really a small fraction of the questions on the test.

In terms of subjects, most were straightforward minus a few questions per subject/system that might ask for really specific items (like what week does X event happen during fetal development?). It's quite difficult to anticipate and prepare for every single one of these types of questions, so you just have to take it and run with whatever they give you.

Pharmacology was mostly straightforward. FA is sufficient. If you have FA pharmacology completely mastered (and I mean completely), then you will get nearly all if not all the pharmacology questions correct. The time investment reading an additional pharmacology text (flash cards included) is not worth it IMO for picking up the 1-2 details that might be tested. I know a majority buy these cards anyway and a majority end up not using them anyway, so just save your monies. The same goes for microbiology.

Physiology was probably the most difficult subject for me. I also had a lot of endocrine/reproductive questions that were also quite challenging, as I had maybe 3-4 questions about cases/scenarios I have never ever encountered during my studies. Like a man with two penises, a vagina, uterus, and three balls kind of thing.

For biostats/behavioral sciences, I felt like FA was good enough. I did not use an external resource, although I was tempted to since this was one of my weakest areas prior to studying.

Oh, another thing I was quite worried about. The question length was not a big deal, although I thought it would be since everyone says the stems are longer than UW/NBME. Time wise, I felt like the really difficult 3-4 questions per block slowed me down more than anything. I probably had 5-15 minutes left per block, whereas in UW I usually have 10-15 minutes. It's hard to use this time properly though, and I only had the will/energy to use this time to review my marked ones. There was however one block where I did not have the time to sufficiently review all my marked questions.

The exam experience overall is kind of odd, in that you are rushing to finish each block (and wish you had more time), but also at the same time wanting to get through the test, a whopping 7 hour ordeal (and thus wanting it to be shorter).

I actually had trouble sleeping even 3-4 days prior to the day before the test, but this was probably more due to an annoying neighbor that recently decided to repeatedly bang on my walls throughout the night.

Alright, I think this is enough for now. Maybe more after I get my score. Time to go sit outside and twiddle my thumbs.
 
Taking the test at the end of this week - went into this whole thing hoping for a 230+ and am now wondering if mid230s-low 240s is out of reach for me? Some background - NBME 12 231 (two weeks ago), NBME 11: 237, NBME 16: 243. NBME 16 was taken yesterday. I took the "Free 150" today and scored 87%. I have a 71% on UW first pass, all random, timed blocks of 46. I have done FA and UWorld primarily, and plan to glance over Pathoma over once more (my initial read-through of Pathoma was during M2). Any other suggestions of how to use the rest of this week for studying? I feel like my scores show I know the material reasonably well for what my goal score is, but I'm feeling nervous based on what I read on here about the types of questions people saw on their real exams!

If you got a 243 on NBME 16, why would you think that low 240s is out of reach?
 
Oh, another thing I was quite worried about. The question length was not a big deal, although I thought it would be since everyone says the stems are longer than UW/NBME. Time wise, I felt like the really difficult 3-4 questions per block slowed me down more than anything. I probably had 5-15 minutes left per block, whereas in UW I usually have 10-15 minutes. It's hard to use this time properly though, and I only had the will/energy to use this time to review my marked ones. There was however one block where I did not have the time to sufficiently review all my marked questions.

The exam experience overall is kind of odd, in that you are rushing to finish each block (and wish you had more time), but also at the same time wanting to get through the test, a whopping 7 hour ordeal (and thus wanting it to be shorter).

I actually had trouble sleeping even 3-4 days prior to the day before the test, but this was probably more due to an annoying neighbor that recently decided to repeatedly bang on my walls throughout the night.

Alright, I think this is enough for now. Maybe more after I get my score. Time to go sit outside and twiddle my thumbs.

I am always impressed when I hear that many of you guys end up with ~10 minutes to review. I have consistently finished all my NBME blocks with only 2-3 minutes left. My NBME scores have (within the last two weeks) have been 245-250, with a random 263 from UWSA1. If I weren't so slow I could probably catch a few inexcusable/dumb mistakes.
 
i
Very true. I've yet to run across any crazy drugs in the CBSEs/NBMEs I've done. I'm sure I'll see something come test day that sticks out but I'll take your word for it and rely on pre-clinical coursework to bail me out. Much appreciated for the input.

And I forgot to add, more importantly: it's easy to forget how difficult it is to keep "just fa" in your memory bank. if youre committed to the idea that FA is THE resource to use, limiting yourself to just FA (in terms of books anyway) will assure that you maximize your exposure to the drugs that are in that book.
 
My nbme scores are not consistent (All were taken 2-3 days apart) :

NBME 15: 249
UWSA1: 265
UWSA2:252
NBME 16:237
NBME 13: 254
NBME 12: 237

Is this normal? I don't think I'm especially weak in some areas; my performance in each section oscillates from excellent to average. I'm aiming for a 250+ and I have a week left before the exam. I'm currently going through FA trying to master the smaller details. Any thoughts?
 
My nbme scores are not consistent (All were taken 2-3 days apart) :

NBME 15: 249
UWSA1: 265
UWSA2:252
NBME 16:237
NBME 13: 254
NBME 12: 237

Is this normal? I don't think I'm especially weak in some areas; my performance in each section oscillates from excellent to average. I'm aiming for a 250+ and I have a week left before the exam. I'm currently going through FA trying to master the smaller details. Any thoughts?

Hmmm, that is a little odd. I would say keep doing what you are doing and make sure you go into the exam confident and well rested. But I guess, you should analyze the questions you are missing? Why are you missing them (particularly on your most recent NBME)? Dumb mistakes, or actual lack of knowledge / inability to figure out what the question is asking? B/c that will probably tell you a lot. At the same time, it's hard to get lucky enough to beat 250 on an exam. That's a great score. I am consistently hitting mid 240s, but I am having a hard time breaking 250....
 
Hmmm, that is a little odd. I would say keep doing what you are doing and make sure you go into the exam confident and well rested. But I guess, you should analyze the questions you are missing? Why are you missing them (particularly on your most recent NBME)? Dumb mistakes, or actual lack of knowledge / inability to figure out what the question is asking? B/c that will probably tell you a lot. At the same time, it's hard to get lucky enough to beat 250 on an exam. That's a great score. I am consistently hitting mid 240s, but I am having a hard time breaking 250....

I probably miss 5-7 questions on every form because of stupid mistakes or over-thinking. I always miss ~20 questions on each NBME. I got 23 wrong on 15-->249; 26 wrong on 12 gave me a 237. It's a little disheartening that getting 3 more questions wrong results in a 12 point drop in your score.
 
I probably miss 5-7 questions on every form because of stupid mistakes or over-thinking. I always miss ~20 questions on each NBME. I got 23 wrong on 15-->249; 26 wrong on 12 gave me a 237. It's a little disheartening that getting 3 more questions wrong results in a 12 point drop in your score.

That's more a result of different curves for each exam.
 
Are the NBME questions generally more straightforward than UWSA's? It seems like the curves are way different (UWSA being more lenient) I haven't taken an NBME yet but did a UWSA. If anyone has taken both NBME and UWSA it'd be great to hear thoughts.

Also, does someone know if you can change the question font size to make it bigger on real test day? On UW I have the font bigger and was kind of thrown for a loop feeling like I needed a magnifying glass during the self assessment (couldn't change the font).

Thanks and appreciate any input!
 
Are the NBME questions generally more straightforward than UWSA's? It seems like the curves are way different (UWSA being more lenient) I haven't taken an NBME yet but did a UWSA. If anyone has taken both NBME and UWSA it'd be great to hear thoughts.

Also, does someone know if you can change the question font size to make it bigger on real test day? On UW I have the font bigger and was kind of thrown for a loop feeling like I needed a magnifying glass during the self assessment (couldn't change the font).

Thanks and appreciate any input!

The font size was another concern of mine before going in. It uses a forced 1024x768 resolution so there is no problem with the fonts being too small to read.
 
Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration was actually the focus of a question in Uworld. Ovary/Breast (anti-Yo) and Lung (anti P/Q, anti-Hu) are the organs and associated antibodies. Pretty sure I remember anti-NMDA antibodies along with paraneoplastic seizures from Uworld as well, although I'm not positive.
So opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome has been classically associated with neuroblastoma, with anti-NMDA abs proposed to be the driver. More recent reports have linked anti-NMDA abs and opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome to ovarian teratomas as well. This is pretty brutal stuff if it presents as a teratoma.
 
Thanks a lot for giving details about how you did NBMEs with DIT. Wouldn't it be better to take an NBME after I'm done with DIT? It seems like DIT will take me ~3 weeks to complete. I plan to start it after I'm done with UW bank in like a week. It would be a dream come true if I start getting scores in your range. By reviewing everything I meant going over wrong UW notes/ weak parts of FA/Pathoma notes to refresh memory, but now I understand what you did before NBME. I really appreciate your guidance.

Well, one of the reasons I took the NBMEs throughout DIT was because I didn't want to have 3 of them left to do in the last 10 days (which would probably burn me out). Plus, I found it helpful doing 1 NBME a week because it's structured and good prep leading up to the actual exam. I guess I also wanted to make sure that my score wasn't actually decreasing as I was going through DIT. Like I said, DIT is great for solidifying the basics, but in order to get above 245, you need to know more than just the basics. There are random details that aren't emphasized in DIT that you can only get from your own in depth studying (or previous knowledge/experiences).
 
I didn't think UWorld was helpful for behavioral sciences because it was hard for me to determine all of the "rules" from Q+A style alone.
The high yield book is definitely behavioral science focused (FA/UWorld are better for biostats). It's only 140 pages long, so it's an easy read for when I feel lazy. They also cover cognitive disorders, sleep, substance abuse/withdrawal and child development in more detail than I got from my school curriculum, which was sadly lacking. A nice review of psych conditions, neurotransmitters and drugs was an added bonus.

It presents case questions during the chapters so you can test yourself (what do you do when an HIV+ mother refuses prenatal AZT treatment? yikes).

There's also an entire section on the physician-patient relationship with a section called "USMLE Quote Questions" where they give you a snapshot like "A 9 year old with a serious disease asks the doctor what is wrong with him, but his parents have told the doctor they do not want him to know he is sick." And then provide you with the correct "Quote" to say, followed by a comment on legality or a more in depth explanation. I know they may be straightforward for most people, but I always get tricked by them.


Is brs behavioral sciences good enough ?
 
Apparently all you people that didn't have biochem on your exam gave it to me. I probably had 40 biochem questions

Also I can confirm lac operon is still testable >_>

What sort of biochem are we talking? Straight up pathway questions? Clinical presentations of enzyme deficiency disorders? Vit deficiencies? Biochem is a very broad subject.
 
NBME 12 (40 days out/beginning of dedicated) - 230
NBME 11 (23 days out) - 239
UWSA 1 (7 days out) - 257
UWSA 2 (today...6 days out) - 260

Here's to hoping for a 250+...I'm hoping the UWSAs don't over-predict TOO much.
 
It sounds like everyone's exam is completely different...makes it all the more interesting to see what you are going to end up with on gameday.
 
I'm probably going to take 2 more NBME's before game day (maybe 3). Already took 7. Which ones do you guys think are best?
 
I'm probably going to take 2 more NBME's before game day (maybe 3). Already took 7. Which ones do you guys think are best?

Do the newest ones. If you can fit them in, I recommend you do all of them. They all seem to be have their own unique characteristics.
 
Took my test recently! Really glad to be done. Here's my experience up to this point. I'm not trying to scare anybody; this forum has helped me a lot and I'm trying my best to give back. I'll answer any question by PM as well.

NBME 5 (9 weeks out): 211 ish
NBME 12 (7 weeks out): 222
NBME 13 (5 weeks out): 260
UWSA 1 (4 weeks out): 260
NBME 15 (2 weeks out): 250
NBME 16 (1 week out): 260


Made some noticeably stupid mistakes on my last few tests, so I felt like I was capable of more. 13 was taken after mostly finishing Uworld (felt a little lucky with that form). 15 was after a week off for studying/taking finals, and again riddled with stupid mistakes.

Prep: Uworld, FA, Pathoma mainly. Worked hard second year. Will update this section after my score comes back (then you'll know whether to listen or not haha).

Test itself
  1. It was prohibitively difficult. Despite all I had reassured and told myself beforehand, I felt absolutely defeated. I'm gonna say what you've heard a lot: Don't get too caught up on that during test day. Just keep plugging forward. Put previous blocks behind you. If you let this feeling overwhelm you it can break you.
  2. Heavy on behavioral and biostats. I had a strong class background, and score well over 90% on first pass Uworld in the subject and consistently "perfected" the section on NBMEs. The real thing was a different story. The ethics questions were on the harder end of the spectrum, and there were behavioral science concepts I had never heard of. I also see what they mean about "quality control". FA/Uworld was NOT sufficient. I honestly have no idea where you'd find the answers to some of these or where I would have run across these concepts beforehand.
  3. Very little anatomy, biochem and neuro. The biochem and neuro that was on there was easy (save for a few WTF questions).
  4. There was a ton of heme/onc about one disease in particular, asked in ways that really made me question whether I knew the concepts at all. This was particularly discouraging.
  5. Lots of next step in management questions, some of which I genuinely had no idea on.
  6. The question style was a cross between Uworld, the Free 150 and later NBMEs, in terms of length and wording, with the difficulty cranked up. There were some stupidly easy ones here and there, but it felt like most of them were "medium-hard" to "hard". Again, they'll throw familiar concepts at you in ways that you haven't seen before, or with vague wording, and after the fatigue and the nerves it can easily trip you up.
Overall I feel like I'll be tremendously lucky to break a 240. Goal from the beginning was 250+.
Did you take your test June 4th because that sounds exactly how mine was...down to your very last detail. I didn't think mine was like anything I had on the NBMEs and on uworld and I went through uworld twice. It was super frustrating test day.
 
Don't count on being able to study for COMLEX after USMLE - the burnout is terrible. Or maybe you are more disciplined that me.

Okay I am seriously worried. I scheduled COMLEX for 3 days after I take Step 1 (so 2 full study days in between) because I wanted a little bit of a break before rotations start. Is this a huge mistake? I mean, I don't know that I can do anything about it now, but I figured I would focus on reviewing Micro and sort of cramming OMM into 2 days. But I was also counting on studying the night of Step 1.

Am I making a big mistake here?
 
Okay I am seriously worried. I scheduled COMLEX for 3 days after I take Step 1 (so 2 full study days in between) because I wanted a little bit of a break before rotations start. Is this a huge mistake? I mean, I don't know that I can do anything about it now, but I figured I would focus on reviewing Micro and sort of cramming OMM into 2 days. But I was also counting on studying the night of Step 1.

Am I making a big mistake here?
Have you been doing combank or comquest?
 
Have you been doing combank or comquest?

No, I've been focusing pretty much all my efforts on Step 1 as of now. I took COMSAE form D and got a 532 and I took COMAT (required by our school) and did fine. Since I'm about a week and a half out from Step 1 I'm a little nervous to start doing Combank or Comquest right now. Or should I be doing that anyway?
 
No, I've been focusing pretty much all my efforts on Step 1 as of now. I took COMSAE form D and got a 532 and I took COMAT (required by our school) and did fine. Since I'm about a week and a half out from Step 1 I'm a little nervous to start doing Combank or Comquest right now. Or should I be doing that anyway?
I would start doing at least 50 questions a day in between uworld. That's what I was doing. I only say this because the style of questions is completely different. USMLE is more lab based where as the COMLEX is more physical exam findings. You really just want to get used to the COMLEX style questions.
 
I would start doing at least 50 questions a day in between uworld. That's what I was doing. I only say this because the style of questions is completely different. USMLE is more lab based where as the COMLEX is more physical exam findings. You really just want to get used to the COMLEX style questions.


Thanks for the response. Do you recommend Combank or Comquest? Also, you think it's ok for me to start now given that the exam is in about 2 weeks? Damn, where did the time go...
 
Thanks for the response. Do you recommend Combank or Comquest? Also, you think it's ok for me to start now given that the exam is in about 2 weeks? Damn, where did the time go...
I've heard good stuff about both. I used combank and heard it was more like the comlex but comquest has some more of the obscure stuff that the comlex may throw at you. Also combank has over 2200 questions whereas comquest has around 1500. What's great about these banks is that after doing uworld you can fly through 50 question blocks in about 30 minutes. I only read the explanations if I guessed on a question or if I got it wrong. I did most of my learning using uworld. I will say there are a few questions I had not seen asked at all in uworld so you get a little different exposure to the same topics. I would at least do all the OMM questions.
 
Okay I am seriously worried. I scheduled COMLEX for 3 days after I take Step 1 (so 2 full study days in between) because I wanted a little bit of a break before rotations start. Is this a huge mistake? I mean, I don't know that I can do anything about it now, but I figured I would focus on reviewing Micro and sort of cramming OMM into 2 days. But I was also counting on studying the night of Step 1.

Am I making a big mistake here?

How strong is your OMM at this point? Honestly I'm being a whiny little baby right now, maybe other people are having an easier time studying after USMLE than I am. You can probably cram micro and OMM in 2 days but I will be very impressed (or maybe just sad for you) if you actually study the night of step 1 🙂
 
Okay I am seriously worried. I scheduled COMLEX for 3 days after I take Step 1 (so 2 full study days in between) because I wanted a little bit of a break before rotations start. Is this a huge mistake? I mean, I don't know that I can do anything about it now, but I figured I would focus on reviewing Micro and sort of cramming OMM into 2 days. But I was also counting on studying the night of Step 1.

Am I making a big mistake here?

That is exactly what I'm doing. I had three full days in between and upperclassmen told me to drop it to two and enjoy an extra day of vacation. I'm just planning to do Savarese, memorize the Chapman's/viscerosomatics, and do the ~180 OMM-specific questions on COMBANK. And a little microbio review.
 
Last edited:
How strong is your OMM at this point? Honestly I'm being a whiny little baby right now, maybe other people are having an easier time studying after USMLE than I am. You can probably cram micro and OMM in 2 days but I will be very impressed (or maybe just sad for you) if you actually study the night of step 1 🙂

Trust me, I am sad for myself 🙂 I think we can be excused for being whiny until we're done. I may end up just taking the night off after Step 1 and leaving the cramming for 2 days. I foresee being burnt out beyond belief. My OMM is pretty good, but as another poster mentioned above the clinical angle of the questions can throw me off.
 
That is exactly what I'm doing. I had three full days I'm between and upperclassmen told me to drop it to two and enjoy an extra day of vacation. I'm just planning to do Savarese, memorize the Chapman's/viscerosomatics, and do the ~180 OMM-specific questions on COMBANK. And a little microbio review.

Ok I feel better after reading this. I'm going to take the advice that Matt1221 gave me about doing some Combank questions daily, but other than that it probably isn't worth spending any more time on it. I'm using Savarese as well. VSR's and Chapman's are the bane of my existence so the less time with it, the better.
 
Sometimes I wonder whether the random things Uworld throws in to make a question more difficult are meant to expose us to that presentation of a question or it's just meant to be a method of training in applying needed knowledge in an unknown way like we will have to on the exam. I.e. I just had a question testing the concept of NMJ blockade through train-of-four stimulation responses. Never heard of train-of-four stimulation and I already know my weakness will be interpretation of studies and graphs, but I don't know if I should bother trying to remember every random test and its mechanism I've never heard of or just try to continue improving on applying the basics.
 
both pathoma and goljan say that nodular sclerosing type of Hodgkin lymphoma is more common in females then males. But FA says equally effects males and females. Can someone clear this up for me thanks!
 
I didn't think UWorld was helpful for behavioral sciences because it was hard for me to determine all of the "rules" from Q+A style alone.
The high yield book is definitely behavioral science focused (FA/UWorld are better for biostats). It's only 140 pages long, so it's an easy read for when I feel lazy. They also cover cognitive disorders, sleep, substance abuse/withdrawal and child development in more detail than I got from my school curriculum, which was sadly lacking. A nice review of psych conditions, neurotransmitters and drugs was an added bonus.

It presents case questions during the chapters so you can test yourself (what do you do when an HIV+ mother refuses prenatal AZT treatment? yikes).

There's also an entire section on the physician-patient relationship with a section called "USMLE Quote Questions" where they give you a snapshot like "A 9 year old with a serious disease asks the doctor what is wrong with him, but his parents have told the doctor they do not want him to know he is sick." And then provide you with the correct "Quote" to say, followed by a comment on legality or a more in depth explanation. I know they may be straightforward for most people, but I always get tricked by them.

Is this it?

http://www.amazon.com/High-Yield-Behavioral-Science-Series-ebook/dp/B009D42QU6
 
My UMSLE experience:
6 months total prep, 1 month dedicated

Materials:
FA 6 passes over 6 months
pathoma
RR blue boxes and margins
Med essentials HY
micro cards
lange pharm cards
BRS biochem cards

Questions:
kaplan qbank 68% (canceled a lot of tests before realizing you couldn't reset it)
usmlerx 75%
uworld 70% first pass, 87% second pass
nbme 15 259 (2 weeks out)
nbme 16 249 (1 week out)
Free 150 92%

Schedule:
For the first 5 months I still had a lot of course work to do, so I prepped for my board exams (I am a DO candidate) during the week and studied for school on the weekends. This was sufficient since my school is pass/fail and prior to this study period I would score within the top 10-20% on most exams, thus I basically slid by for the last 5 months. Treated this exam like a 35 hour/week job during the school year, and maybe 50 hours during dedicated.

For my entire education, I have been a minimalist and I try and maximize what I know from minimal sources. Further, I get little from reading text and need to be actively engaged, and thus my study prep worked well for me. I tried reading some kaplan lecture notes and CMMRS but I got bored and lost focus very quickly. If you are an average student, even at a DO school, I strongly think you only need FA/pathoma/uworld. I tried using DIT, and I did it for a while, mostly at night (I am a morning person) so that I could have something to do to extend my study hours per day, and tried to learn passively. It seems like my classmates have mixed feelings about DIT, where some loved it, and some like me liked 1/4th of it. To understand something, I like to know why, and out of the several instructors at DIT or whatever, only 1 or 2 go into the why, whereas the others just read from the teleprompter. Different strokes for different folks. All of the supplemental crap, DIT, firecracker, etc, you need to try it before you buy it. DIT came to my school and hyped it up, and probably got a ton of sales from prying on many naive, worried, students. Try before you buy!

Further, I am a anal-retentive planner. If I don't have a set schedule every single day, my head explodes. So early November I set a day by day schedule of what I hoped to accomplish, using my weekends as buffers. The schedule was set in Thanksgiving, but changed weekly as I realized what was realistic and not. This was advantageous for me because I knew I would only study at most 8 hours a day (even during dedicated time), and I could have a normal life outside of studying (ie played xbox daily, worked out 30-50 mins/day, and/or watched all of the office and the good wife)

Months 1-2 I read FA (20-30 pages/day), listened to all pathoma (1 chapter/day) and annotated his words into text, read 30 notecards/day (shuffled all my cards into one giant deck), finished kaplan qbank (92 questions/day).
Months 3-4 I continued to read FA (20-30 pages/day), read 1 chapter of pathoma a day, read 30 notecards/day, finished usmlerx (92 questions/day), partially read Medessentials and add some stuff that wasn't in FA
Month 5: FA (40-50 pages/day), Uworld tutor mode & untimed (2-3 blocks/day), 40 notecards/day
Month 6: FA (50 pages/day), uworld timed and random (4 blocks/day only studied incorrects), reread pathoma 1 week before test, completed 1-2 nbmes/week, uworld assessment exam
Week before exam: 1 final pass of FA (100 pages/day), RR path (focusing on images and big picture), Med essentials appendix (its like FA's rapid review section, but more detailed, includes images)
Day before exam: Looked at all pharm and micro in FA and took most of the day off

My exam experience
I over studied for this crappy exam. It is pretty unfortunate that I was scoring pretty solid on my uworld and NBMEs and left thinking I frankly have no idea if I did well or not. During NBME's I would mark 10 questions per block, on my Step 1 exam I marked 8-12 questions on 6 blocks and about 20 questions on another block. I think this was out of fear, but there were easily 5 questions per block that were not at all in FA (FA, pathology, micro). Kind of scary that my future depends on this test, given that there was a lot of touchy-feel-ethics and epidemiology. The exam was just like uworld in format except for the media questions, which were more in depth, clearer images, and frankly pretty obvious.

I think FA + uworld gave me a solid foundation to answer 70% of the questions from buzzwords and pattern recognition. The other 10% were a crap shoot and were neither in FA nor were they covered in my first 2 years. The other 20% was minuscule detail that was not something that one could prepare for. I think this type of material stems from your schools education, and if you have a good foundation from years 1 & 2 you will do well reasoning these questions out, and if not, studying 10 different books a few months before your exam won't help (just my opinion). There are too many topics that this exam can test you on, that if you don't have a solid foundation, there is a potential to struggle. The exam must be completely randomized from a giant qbank because I had 2 sets of questions that were almost identical, and completely different experience than what some of our fellow sdn'ers have commented on.

In hind sight I would have taken the exam a month earlier or started a month later. Six months prep is too much for the average US graduate, I think. Further, I would have saved money by not buying usmlerx or kaplan. I felt that while these sources give you a lot more detail, they don't build the foundation you need to do well; Uworld does this sufficiently. RX was more worthwhile than kaplan since kaplan is very detail orientated, and I felt my exam was more big picture orientated. 2 weeks ago I would have said, I will study anything to get a higher score, but after taking the exam I can not confidently say that the extra qbanks really helped. Lastly, Med Essentials is not really talked about on these forums but it has a lot information which was not in FA. I ended up putting around 25 pages of notes from ME into FA (brainstem stuff, physio, anatomy, etc), and I was glad that I did. Further micro and biochem are not taught sufficiently at my school, and I felt that BRS biochem cards, FA biochem, and FA micro was sufficient.

On to comlex, but I figured I took away so much from previous students' experiences that I would further contribute.


TLDR: 3-4 months is plenty of study time, FA + uworld + pathoma + a few nbmes is sufficient for materials, supplement with RR path and med essentials for pictures and a few topics not covered in FA
 
Last edited:
Okay I am seriously worried. I scheduled COMLEX for 3 days after I take Step 1 (so 2 full study days in between) because I wanted a little bit of a break before rotations start. Is this a huge mistake? I mean, I don't know that I can do anything about it now, but I figured I would focus on reviewing Micro and sort of cramming OMM into 2 days. But I was also counting on studying the night of Step 1.

Am I making a big mistake here?

I wouldn't say you're making a mistake. Most people who leave more time than that say they ended up wasting it. Most advice I received was take it asap. Personally I had 1.5d. Something to consider is which score is most important to you...
 
Just a thought for anyone 1-2 weeks out. I think its worth buying Kaplan qbank for 1 month because it gives you a 4 block diagnostic with answers, and two full 7 block sims with answers, and the qbank. For $99 for one month, I'd say thats better than buying 2 NBMEs.
 
Goal score is a 255.

NBME 11: 256 (6 weeks out)
NBME 12: 258 (3 weeks out)
NBME 13: 251 (2 weeks out)
UWSA 2: 265 (2 weeks out)
NBME 15: 264 (1 week out)
NBME 16: 255 (3 days out)

Prep: Pathoma/UW/FA/UsmleRX/Khan's ethics/HY biostats

Test experience: Not sure if this write up will be helpful to anyone as it will likely be much shorter than most posts in regard to test experience. But here goes. The meat (80%) of this exam was fair, I thought. No real surprises except that the vignettes were considerably longer than anything I had seen before. I was pressed for time on a few blocks, something I never experienced on any NBME or Uworld block. You really do have to work quickly, which can be very stressful given that many questions aren't straight recall/click.

The other 20% of the exam was so spotty. It was either a one-liner question about something I've never even heard of before, or it was a three paragraph vignette with a graph and a table of experimental data that made it feel like MCAT verbal all over again. It was tough for me to gauge the intent of the test writer on these questions. But still, these longer questions were possible to answer; you just have to be feeling fresh on test day and willing to skim some of the fluff. Sometimes it's hard to skim because we're afraid of missing crucial info. But using multiple paragraphs to say that a patient has chronic bronchitis - that's frustrating once you realize you wasted a minute reaching this conclusion, when all you needed to read was "pt is a 50 pack year smoker and has had a productive cough for 3 years."

Also, I tried to be very aggressive on eliminating answers which I'm hoping will pay off.

I can already recall 5 or so questions I got wrong, and there were many many others where I just gave my best guess and moved on. It's sort of a terrible feeling to think that I prepped for so long, scored well on practice exams, but might have really under-performed on the real thing. Though, I realize this is a common feeling leaving the exam, so I'm hoping to score my average NBME. Fingers crossed.

I thought the subjects on the exam were evenly distributed aside from a couple subjects - I felt like I had a ton of lung pathology and dermatology. Yes, derm. I nearly punched my computer screen when I got my 6th derm question. Pharm/Biochem was relatively straight-forward. The heart murmurs were very fair.

Tl;dr It's a challenging test, but with good prep, I do believe most of the test is beatable; however, be aware that there is a small minority of questions that are out of this world and you just can't prepare for them. Answer them as best you can and just move on.
 
@Alacran @green222 @lolinternets @DrShazam @001100010010011 @Subconcious @WhizoMD @handsofblue
Hey guys. I'm burning through uworld trying to get my average up to to the 78-80% and it doesn't seem possible given how many question I have gotten wrong when I first started (was in the 60% range). so my question is for anyone who posted their uwold scores and step score:
How did you report your Uworld average %?

Cumulative average of all question

or​

(You can click to vote or post your reply)
Thanks for the help and the great posts of your experiences!​
 
It seems like physiology tends to be fairly significant on the boards, perhaps constituting more of the difficult, yet doable questions. Anyone have any recommendations for how to prepare for it? I have a solid foundation from med school, but I was thinking about doing some of the BRS phys questions. Not sure if its worth it though, as these tend to be way more detailed and harder than the Qbank questions. Any advice?
 
It seems like physiology tends to be fairly significant on the boards, perhaps constituting more of the difficult, yet doable questions. Anyone have any recommendations for how to prepare for it? I have a solid foundation from med school, but I was thinking about doing some of the BRS phys questions. Not sure if its worth it though, as these tend to be way more detailed and harder than the Qbank questions. Any advice?
My physio was pretty tough. I am not sure the BRS questions are super important since they are just regurgitation, and most of the physio I experienced was 2nd order type stuff. You need to know the principle and then apply it to a new question. Uworld prepared me for probably 80% of the questions I encountered.
 
It seems like physiology tends to be fairly significant on the boards, perhaps constituting more of the difficult, yet doable questions. Anyone have any recommendations for how to prepare for it? I have a solid foundation from med school, but I was thinking about doing some of the BRS phys questions. Not sure if its worth it though, as these tend to be way more detailed and harder than the Qbank questions. Any advice?

A lot of my physio questions were endocrine. Wouldn't hurt to just do the endocrine BRS chapter to get you ready for all of those crazy arrow questions.
 
Top