Official 2014 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
After taking the test and talking to classmates, I think it's worth stating on SDN that Step 1 seems to be heavy on heme/onc (know your anemias well!) and clinical anatomy. Know your vasculature and anastamoses (and not just the easy portal HTN vessels). Lastly, know your arm/hand and leg/foot anatomy (muscles, carpal fractures, etc). They seem to be common questions that no one really focuses on. Guaranteed to get a few extra points from this stuff.

Good luck and thank you SDN for everything over the years.
 
Have you been reading FA? If you haven't I'd suggest at least 2 passes. You could consider pathoma but you already did goljan twice so the returns on that may be diminished. There are roughly 48 full 46-question blocks in UW (+ 3 more extra questions), so 96 blocks in 30 days would be 3-4 blocks a day everyday which is about 3/4 the length of an NBME. So you are looking at doing around 3 NBMEs every 4 days and going over them. I'd say about 6-7 hours a day if you are quick.

Thanks for replying to my post. I only went through FA while annotating stuff from kaplan/goljan. I didn't get a chance to read it properly and I realize now that I added stuff that was already there in FA. My path is pretty strong and it'll get better with FA/UW I am scared about biochem and biostats. I don't know how much UW will help me with that.
 
5 months out: CBSSA16 - 192 (required by school)
4 weeks out: UW1 - 238
2 weeks out: NBME16 - 243
1 week out: UW2 and NBME15 (took them consecutively to simulate real exam) - 253 and 256 respectively
Actual score: 255

Resources: First Aid, Uworld Qbank, Pathoma videos
 
Despite only 1 hour of sleep, feeling like death during the exam, and messing up so many easy questions... I got a score that was EXACTLY the average of my NBMEs... 13,15,16... 222. More than happy with that considering I'm no science buff and my background is in anything but science :-D I think I could have pulled an extra few points had I had any sleep and was in a better state of mind... that's what I'm working on between now and my first shelf. My goal is non-academic small town EM or IM.
 
POST EXAM UPDATE

I took the exam on 6/16. Wanted to give myself about a week or so after taking the test before I made another update on here.
Here is how I performed on practice exams:
UWorld (Timed/Organ specific): 72%
NBME 7 (5 weeks out): 220
NBME 11 (4 weeks out): 245
NBME 13 (3 weeks out): 241
NBME 12 (2 weeks out): 230
UWSA1 (1.5 weeks out): 245
NBME 15 (1 week out): 239
Free 150 (1 week out): 83%
NBME 16 (3 days out): 242
UWSA2 (3 days out): 265

Coming out of the test, I felt it was substantially more difficult than any of the NBMEs. I felt UWSA2 was most representative of the difficulty of the real exam (albeit the scoring is clearly more lenient). My preparation consisted of DIT, FA, UWorld, Pathoma. I also worked really hard to make sure I put myself in the best position to get proper sleep the night before, (I made a routine of going to bed at 10:30 every night, and waking up around 7:00 every morning). I had no problems going to sleep during my dedicated study period, but lo and behold, the night before my test, I found myself tossing and turning in bed until 1 AM as I always do the night before the test. It's kind of a self fulfilling prophecy to be honest, and I refuse to take any sort of sleeping pills. At any rate, I did not feel fatigued or tired despite only getting about 4 hours of sleep, and I did not feel impaired at any point during the test.

Now that I am about a week removed from my exam, my idea of how it went has changed a bit. It was definitely not as bad as I thought it was when I had just finished. While I still think it is on par with UWSA2 as far as difficulty, I would generally distribute my tests difficulty like this (50%: Straightforward, straight recall, no laterally thinking type of questions; 30%: More thinking, unusual presentations that you just have to stick to your gut with; 10%: Hardly testing your medical knowledge and more of an aptitude test; 10%: Extremely difficult question that can still be narrowed down to 2-3 answer choices, but from there it's a toss up). There were only 2 questions on the whole test where I had absolutely no clue what was going on and I just picked my favorite letter in that moment.

Now for a few more specifics:
Biostats: No problems here. Maybe 7 questions that were plug and chug.
Ethics: I had A LOT of ethics. ~16-18 questions. Most of them were easy. 2-3 of them felt like had two right answers, and had to pick the BEST answer, and these were much harder obviously.
Biochem: One of my glaring weaknesses. Fortunately for me, this was hardly tested. I had maybe 8 biochem questions on the whole test, most of which were straightforward.
Micro: Straightforward, and well represented on the test. It's all in First Aid.
Immunology: Straightforward. This is like a 15 page section in First Aid, so there is really no excuse to not do well on immuno questions.
Pharmacology: Straightforward. All drugs I had heard of before. All in First Aid.
Pathology/Physiology: Bread and butter of the test. Felt like pathoma adequately prepared me for Path. Physiology has always been a weakness of mine however, but I did not feel overwhelmed in this department.
Anatomy: Another glaring weakness (for most people I think). Thought it was well represented on my test, but nothing outrageous. Had a few questions where I really had to just make an educated guess and move on because I had no idea. Freaking hand and foot ligaments. Also, I didn't get very many CTs or imaging.
Organ Specific: Felt like it was all well balanced with the exception of Psychiatry which I probably only had 3 questions on for the whole test. The heart sound questions were very straightforward.

I have counted 8 questions that I have missed for sure (2 of which where I knew the right answer, but I just talked myself out of it).

I was surprised at how many "next step in management" questions I had, as well as general physical diagnosis. I did not have problems with time, (mainly because I was expecting it and was mindful of moving quickly). The question stems are consistently longer than UWorld and NBMEs, but I think that can be attributed to the random fluff they throw into most questions. I can see how one could have problems with time if they get hung up on all the detail each question presents. The shorter 2 sentence questions tended to be the harder questions.

Overall, I have very little idea as to how I am going to score on this thing. My goal coming into my dedicated study period was 240 and that hasn't changed. I feel that it is certainly possible I could get that, but I also feel like it's possible for me to get something like a 220, I really don't know. I felt like I made educated guesses on most of the test, but that is nothing different from when I do a block of UWorld or UWSA2, and I did okay on those.

I will find out on July 9th and let everyone know then.

Actual Score: 250

So this was 10 points above my NBME 11-16 average. Above includes information on my NBME scores and my exam experience. Now for how I studied:

Before dedicated study time: Used First Aid throughout my curriculum (system-based). When it came to my dedicated study period, I had already been through first aid once. I also got through USMLERx Qbank before the dedicated study time. I started doing UWorld beginning second semester of MS2 on organ-specific/timed with the hopes of getting through two passes. What I would have done differently: Save UWorld for dedicated study time. Ideally, you want to do UWorld on all-random/timed when you are comfortable with all disciplines. Also, I wish I would have studied better/harder for anatomy. There is just so much that you can not and will not study for in this subject that will show up on your test. The only way you can get these right is if you can recall something from year 1. To study specifically for these questions is a waste of time as the subject is just too broad.

Dedicated study time (6 Weeks):
Materials: DIT + First Aid + UWorld + Pathoma

DIT:
For the first 4 weeks I spent my mornings watching 8 videos of DIT a day and completing their workbook. I consider this just a pass through First Aid and not much more. Of the four resources I posted, this is EASILY the least valuable and not essential. However, I did find DIT useful in that it broke up the monotony of studying. I would watch videos in the morning, do questions in the afternoon, and read FA at night. Variety was what kept me moving forward, and I think this is important in studying: hearing the same thing, over and over again, from different sources.

First Aid: Obviously essential in studying for Step1. However I've seen a couple students using Kaplan MedEssentials, but 95% use FA. The key to this book for me was just reading it as many times as I could. I annotated important concepts from UWorld into the pertinent sections in First Aid. If you include DIT as a pass thru FA, I got through the book four times. Each time, you want to add a layer of detail. First pass through FA is just to gain familiarity with the material. Each subsequent pass, you want to make note of what you did not know from the previous pass, and keep adding onto your knowledge. This is a very difficult book to LEARN from, but practice makes perfect. It's often what is in between the lines that helps you answer the question. However, First Aid alone can get you very far. Each subsequent pass also goes a bit faster I noticed. The book took me like 4+ months to get through the first time. 1 month the second time. 1 week the next time.

UWorld: The #1 resource in my opinion. Also the most frustrating. This was a constant struggle to determine how much time I should actually spend reviewing my answers, and it's about finding that balance. Obviously, the less questions you miss, the less time it will take you to review. I found that there was MORE I wanted to do in the day than to spend 5-6 hours reviewing my questions in UWorld, so I would simply read the Educational Objective on questions and concepts I knew I had down. I would read fully all the ones I got wrong, and toward the end of my studies (last 2 weeks), I was annotating very sparingly. I would recommend saving UWorld for your dedicated study time as there is a certain rhythm and groove you develop from doing 46 question blocks on all-random/timed on a regular basis (like twice daily). However, I am not entirely against doing UWorld by organ-specific and using it purely as a learning resource. For me, I didn't want to waste this valuable resource simply because I was not comfortable with a specific subject yet. Toward the end of my dedicated study time when I felt relatively comfortable with everything, I started to appreciate the value of all-random/timed mode.

Pathoma: In my last week of study, I had completed UWorld and DIT. I was quite burned out, and had NO motivation to continue redoing my missed UWorld questions. So I needed a spark. I also had very little interest in purely reading FA. Pathoma was what saved me, and possibly what gave me that extra 10 points from my last NBME to actual Step 1. Dr. Sattar was yet another voice telling me many things I already knew, and surprisingly many things I did not know (which was kind of unsettling within one week before my test). The fact there was so much active LEARNING still occurring this close to my test is what kept my motivated and finishing strong in this last week of studying. I watched all of Pathoma on 1.5 speed in my final week.

Key to success: Confidence is very important in this exam. For me, it was easier to trust my instincts on the real test than on practice tests because I realized I had no choice at that point. If I came across something that made me thing "hmm I think I remember the PCT being most susceptible to ischemia" that thought became "the PCT is most susceptible to ischemia. Period." There was no room for doubt. Even if what I was thinking was absolutely WRONG, I was stubborn about my wrongness. And the key is to be stubborn. Also, I think the last 2 weeks are the most important in the dedicated study period. It's about seeing as much as you can as fast as you can to keep it all fresh. This is a rare instance in which quantity outweighs quality. It's all about keeping those synapses dusted off for the big day, so try to get through an entire pass of First Aid during the last week of your studies. And cover your weaknesses again 2 days and the day before your test.
 
Oh and one more thing. I would like to thank everyone on this thread that has contributed to the discussion. It has humbled me and kept me motivated throughout the experience.
 
Thanks for replying to my post. I only went through FA while annotating stuff from kaplan/goljan. I didn't get a chance to read it properly and I realize now that I added stuff that was already there in FA. My path is pretty strong and it'll get better with FA/UW I am scared about biochem and biostats. I don't know how much UW will help me with that.

My impression of the UW qbank for biostat overall is that it's highly skewed for risk calculation type questions (which to be fair shows up a lot) and I wish it hit more on testing the basic concepts of specificity/sensitivity/PPV/NPV.

However, if it's biostats/epidemiology you are looking to bolster, you can read High-Yield Biostatistics and try the UW Biostat/Epi qbank. I've heard good reviews for HY and some people have mentioned the UW biostat qbank but I'm less familiar with the latter.
 
My impression of the UW qbank for biostat overall is that it's highly skewed for risk calculation type questions (which to be fair shows up a lot) and I wish it hit more on testing the basic concepts of specificity/sensitivity/PPV/NPV.

However, if it's biostats/epidemiology you are looking to bolster, you can read High-Yield Biostatistics and try the UW Biostat/Epi qbank. I've heard good reviews for HY and some people have mentioned the UW biostat qbank but I'm less familiar with the latter.

I felt like FA and UW was more than enough for Biostat. I don't think it's worth reading extraneous books.
 
I felt like FA and UW was more than enough for Biostat. I don't think it's worth reading extraneous books.

I'm not implying that FA+UW isn't sufficient, it is for most people and that's what I used. However, I can also see that FA/UW may fall short for some people who has had little exposure to that sort of thing. It may be worth it to use other resources to supplement even if you don't end up reading them cover to cover or using them in their entirety.
 
Honestly, it didn't help on my form. I had several really tough anatomy questions, at least 3 of which I missed. But I don't think it was a total waste of time if you're solid in your basics. I only spent 3-4 hours on it.

I LOVE your profile name and pic

Who?

My' Jooonnneeesss lmao
 
I took it yesterday.

How I studied:
I started in January by reading Pathoma, FA, and Goljan once, concurrently by subject. Also listened to Goljan lectures whenever I drove anywhere. Started doing Rx after my first pass of reading, averaging mid fifties. After getting about halfway through I decided to take some more time for dedicated studying, especially for pharm. I used the Lange pharm cards, which I thought were excellent. By the end of the semester, my averages were in the seventies on Rx.

I had one month dedicated study time. I did two or three UWorld blocks per day and spent the rest of my time doing another pass of FA and Pathoma. I found picmonic to be really helpful not just for pharm and micro, but also biochem and lysosomal/glycogen diseases and the like.

Scores before the test:
School-administered CBSE in March: 205
NBME 11 (end of May): 232
UWSA 1 (one week out): 253
UWSA 2 (four days out): 253
Free 150 (two days before): 79%
UWorld cum avg: 67%

Day of exam:
I thought the test overall was fair, and about as difficult as the average UWorld block. I didn't feel too much in the way of test fatigue, as I was used to three blocks per day for the last month anyway, in addition to the adrenaline of test day.

I had a ton of immuno (~30 questions or so) and a lot of respiratory questions. Also a fair number of anatomy questions (~15) most of which were pretty easy. Around five questions that were wtf type questions that you can't really prepare for.

All in all, I feel fine about it. I could've done more in the way of prep. I especially wish I had been more disciplined during the spring semester and knocked out the Kaplan qbank and done more NBMEs. But I gave it a good effort and I learned a TON in studying for this test.

My goal is >240. My guess is that I scored somewhere between 235-250. I'll update when I get my score.

So I ended up with a 239. Obviously, this is a good score and makes me competitive for just about anything save maybe derm and plastics, so I'm happy in that regard. I can't help but be a little disappointed that I missed my goal score of 240 or above. Yes, I know it's neurotic and doesn't make any difference, but it's still disappointing when you don't meet the goals you set for yourself.

I think where I went wrong was not starting qbanks earlier and being more disciplined about getting them done. I started Rx in January with the goal of doing 2 sets/day but ended up taking a lengthy break until March (studying other stuff) and then was really spotty getting them done. I only really hunkered down during my dedicated study period in late May. If I would've gotten through Rx (finished around 92% of it) and Kaplan (which I hardly touched), as well as all of UWorld, I'm confident that I could've surpassed my goal score.

But like I said, 239 is a good score and I'm so happy to be done with Step 1. Best of luck to all those who take it in the future and hopefully my experience is helpful.
 
Actual Score: 250

So this was 10 points above my NBME 11-16 average. Above includes information on my NBME scores and my exam experience. Now for how I studied:

Before dedicated study time: Used First Aid throughout my curriculum (system-based). When it came to my dedicated study period, I had already been through first aid once. I also got through USMLERx Qbank before the dedicated study time. I started doing UWorld beginning second semester of MS2 on organ-specific/timed with the hopes of getting through two passes. What I would have done differently: Save UWorld for dedicated study time. Ideally, you want to do UWorld on all-random/timed when you are comfortable with all disciplines. Also, I wish I would have studied better/harder for anatomy. There is just so much that you can not and will not study for in this subject that will show up on your test. The only way you can get these right is if you can recall something from year 1. To study specifically for these questions is a waste of time as the subject is just too broad.

Dedicated study time (6 Weeks):
Materials: DIT + First Aid + UWorld + Pathoma

DIT:
For the first 4 weeks I spent my mornings watching 8 videos of DIT a day and completing their workbook. I consider this just a pass through First Aid and not much more. Of the four resources I posted, this is EASILY the least valuable and not essential. However, I did find DIT useful in that it broke up the monotony of studying. I would watch videos in the morning, do questions in the afternoon, and read FA at night. Variety was what kept me moving forward, and I think this is important in studying: hearing the same thing, over and over again, from different sources.

First Aid: Obviously essential in studying for Step1. However I've seen a couple students using Kaplan MedEssentials, but 95% use FA. The key to this book for me was just reading it as many times as I could. I annotated important concepts from UWorld into the pertinent sections in First Aid. If you include DIT as a pass thru FA, I got through the book four times. Each time, you want to add a layer of detail. First pass through FA is just to gain familiarity with the material. Each subsequent pass, you want to make note of what you did not know from the previous pass, and keep adding onto your knowledge. This is a very difficult book to LEARN from, but practice makes perfect. It's often what is in between the lines that helps you answer the question. However, First Aid alone can get you very far. Each subsequent pass also goes a bit faster I noticed. The book took me like 4+ months to get through the first time. 1 month the second time. 1 week the next time.

UWorld: The #1 resource in my opinion. Also the most frustrating. This was a constant struggle to determine how much time I should actually spend reviewing my answers, and it's about finding that balance. Obviously, the less questions you miss, the less time it will take you to review. I found that there was MORE I wanted to do in the day than to spend 5-6 hours reviewing my questions in UWorld, so I would simply read the Educational Objective on questions and concepts I knew I had down. I would read fully all the ones I got wrong, and toward the end of my studies (last 2 weeks), I was annotating very sparingly. I would recommend saving UWorld for your dedicated study time as there is a certain rhythm and groove you develop from doing 46 question blocks on all-random/timed on a regular basis (like twice daily). However, I am not entirely against doing UWorld by organ-specific and using it purely as a learning resource. For me, I didn't want to waste this valuable resource simply because I was not comfortable with a specific subject yet. Toward the end of my dedicated study time when I felt relatively comfortable with everything, I started to appreciate the value of all-random/timed mode.

Pathoma: In my last week of study, I had completed UWorld and DIT. I was quite burned out, and had NO motivation to continue redoing my missed UWorld questions. So I needed a spark. I also had very little interest in purely reading FA. Pathoma was what saved me, and possibly what gave me that extra 10 points from my last NBME to actual Step 1. Dr. Sattar was yet another voice telling me many things I already knew, and surprisingly many things I did not know (which was kind of unsettling within one week before my test). The fact there was so much active LEARNING still occurring this close to my test is what kept my motivated and finishing strong in this last week of studying. I watched all of Pathoma on 1.5 speed in my final week.

Key to success: Confidence is very important in this exam. For me, it was easier to trust my instincts on the real test than on practice tests because I realized I had no choice at that point. If I came across something that made me thing "hmm I think I remember the PCT being most susceptible to ischemia" that thought became "the PCT is most susceptible to ischemia. Period." There was no room for doubt. Even if what I was thinking was absolutely WRONG, I was stubborn about my wrongness. And the key is to be stubborn. Also, I think the last 2 weeks are the most important in the dedicated study period. It's about seeing as much as you can as fast as you can to keep it all fresh. This is a rare instance in which quantity outweighs quality. It's all about keeping those synapses dusted off for the big day, so try to get through an entire pass of First Aid during the last week of your studies. And cover your weaknesses again 2 days and the day before your test.



What is DIT if I may ask?
 
Doctors in training is very expensive, many people don't use it although a lot of my classmates did. It's a video lecture series with a book that lets you do questions as you go through everything. It's really good for people who need to make a schedule but I just used one that an upperclassman made which was loosely based on the tau method.
 
For those of you who used Firecracker, would you also recommend doing USMLERx doing the school year for MS2? I know they both use FA as the basis for their questions - is there a lot of overlap?
 
As I said, DIT is very hit or miss and certainly not an essential resource. The reason I liked it was that it broke up some of the monotony of studying. I agree with the above post in that it is the bare minimum if used alone.
 
Took it today (6/19), and I thought it was incredibly difficult. Easily marked >20 questions per block.

I felt like I spent the entire exam reading a vignette, thinking"oh this is X", and then the answers had NOTHING to do with what I expected the right answer to be. I was "confident" on maybe 10 questions per block, and felt like I was constantly picking between 3 esoteric answer choices. A lot of really obscure anatomy, drugs not in FA, and a TON of arrow questions with really weird variables (nothing like I'd seen in Uworld). Had a lot of questions on mitochondrial diseases, and biochem disorders. On a positive note, I had literally 5 questions on PJP and at least 3-4 on trigeminal neuralgia. Also had a TON of really weird ethics scenarios with equally weird answer choices.

Incredibly demoralizing, with a lot of questions I can't even seem to find a correct answer to with some Googling. Oh well, here's to waiting it out...

Step 1: XXX

I opened my score report praying for anything above a 240 and was utterly shocked.

I still maintain the best prep for step 1 is doing well and learning the material during the preclinical years. There are a solid 10-20 questions I can think of that I got right solely because of things I learned during school that weren't in review books. I used the standard FA+Uworld+Pathoma (during school) supplemented with Goljan audio (during the school year and again during dedicated) and RR Path for reference.

CBSSE (school administered in April): 250
NBME 13 (4 weeks out): 247
NMBE 15 (2 weeks out): 256
NMBE 16 (1 week out): 256
Uworld (all timed/random): 76%

I had 2 UWSAs and the free 150 I didn't end up using due to time constraints.

Trust the preparation, and don't get bogged down chasing what other people said was on their test.
 
Last edited:
As I said, DIT is very hit or miss and certainly not an essential resource. The reason I liked it was that it broke up some of the monotony of studying. I agree with the above post in that it is the bare minimum if used alone.
I liked DIT--I used it as a first pass for first aid, as I don't like reading. Probably doing 1000's of questions helped me the most.
 
If someone who recently took the exam can please quote and reply to how much of each of the following low yield subjects they had (# of questions):
1. Embryology -
2. Anatomy -
3. Genetics -
4. Immunology -
5. Behavioral Science -

If any of you want to add in the high yield topics, please feel free and it will be greatly appreciated!:
6. Pathology -
7. Pharmacology -
8. Microbiology -
9. Physiology -
10. Biochemistry -
11. Neuroscience (including Neuroanatomy) -


Btw, is the exam still a majority of pathology and pharmacology? Students use to tell me it's literally half the exam (those 2 subjects combined). Rightfully so, it's the most clinically related. I've heard physio is down on the exam now, but you gotta know it for path questions b/c of the pathophys, etc... I heard Micro was more high yield than Physio but not sure!

Greatly appreciate any and all responses guys. Great job to all of you, congratulations on being done 🙂
 
If someone who recently took the exam can please quote and reply to how much of each of the following low yield subjects they had (# of questions):
1. Embryology -
2. Anatomy -
3. Genetics -
4. Immunology -
5. Behavioral Science -

If any of you want to add in the high yield topics, please feel free and it will be greatly appreciated!:
6. Pathology -
7. Pharmacology -
8. Microbiology -
9. Physiology -
10. Biochemistry -
11. Neuroscience (including Neuroanatomy) -


Btw, is the exam still a majority of pathology and pharmacology? Students use to tell me it's literally half the exam (those 2 subjects combined). Rightfully so, it's the most clinically related. I've heard physio is down on the exam now, but you gotta know it for path questions b/c of the pathophys, etc... I heard Micro was more high yield than Physio but not sure!

Greatly appreciate any and all responses guys. Great job to all of you, congratulations on being done 🙂

No one here knows the distribution of questions on the exams. Take a look at what people have reported in their comments; everyone has exams that differ significantly.
 
Hi guys, I haven't posted in a really long time on this forum, but did anyone take this exam in July 11th? I feel horrible, my nbme's were all 240+ and I just don't feel like that after this. I feel horrible and am terrified about the results. Can anyone who took it around this time shed some light on their experience? I felt like I was guessing through most of it and never really felt sure of myself. Didn't think id feel this bad.
 
June and July are when most students take the exam. Maybe they've been experimenting with questions? Idk, just doesn't seem right recently that so many people are feeling like this walking out of the exam. What good does it do on judging any medical student by giving them things they can not answer through their first 2 years of med school. I've heard some outrageous questions that were on some people's exam from this past week and week before. Idk why the examiners are enjoying doing this...it's just dumb. Stop the experimenting or whatever it is you're doing.
 
About biochemistry,i have just finished uw biochem. section and it was very tough.Compared to the real deal,was biochemistry easier than uw or around this difficulty ?
 
The real deal biochemistry was a joke. Someone on here said that they had tons of biochem questions. I didn't--put a lot into studying biochem and all I got were basic biochem associated path questions.
 
June and July are when most students take the exam. Maybe they've been experimenting with questions? Idk, just doesn't seem right recently that so many people are feeling like this walking out of the exam. What good does it do on judging any medical student by giving them things they can not answer through their first 2 years of med school. I've heard some outrageous questions that were on some people's exam from this past week and week before. Idk why the examiners are enjoying doing this...it's just dumb. Stop the experimenting or whatever it is you're doing.

Yet despite this, recently released scores here on SDN and among my friends were very good. So either it's all in our heads or there are a lot of trial questions.
 
Yes because everyone's honest about their scores on SDN right? lol

If that's true then the average step 1 score on SDN is >245
 
June and July are when most students take the exam. Maybe they've been experimenting with questions? Idk, just doesn't seem right recently that so many people are feeling like this walking out of the exam. What good does it do on judging any medical student by giving them things they can not answer through their first 2 years of med school. I've heard some outrageous questions that were on some people's exam from this past week and week before. Idk why the examiners are enjoying doing this...it's just dumb. Stop the experimenting or whatever it is you're doing.
People have been walking out of the exam feeling like crap for at least the last 2 years (which is how long I've been following the step I forum here). It's nothing new.
 
Yes because everyone's honest about their scores on SDN right? lol

If that's true then the average step 1 score on SDN is >245
So your thought process is: I bet all these people are lying about their scores, this seems like a good place to seek advice.
 
Yes because everyone's honest about their scores on SDN right? lol

If that's true then the average step 1 score on SDN is >245

Actually I bet it's probably a lot higher than the overall average. It is a self-selecting population at all. Doesn't mean everyone's lying. What would be the point?
 
Hi guys, I haven't posted in a really long time on this forum, but did anyone take this exam in July 11th? I feel horrible, my nbme's were all 240+ and I just don't feel like that after this. I feel horrible and am terrified about the results. Can anyone who took it around this time shed some light on their experience? I felt like I was guessing through most of it and never really felt sure of myself. Didn't think id feel this bad.
I took the exam early june. my highest nbme was 234. FELT AWFUL after the exam---242. I'd just trust your practice score.
 
Jan CBSE: 170
Mar CBSE: 200
May 2 CBSE: 220
May 17 UWorld SA #2: 226
May 24 UWorld SA #1: 244
UWorld 1st pass: 68%

Actual exam score was the average of my UWorld SA exams. I have a few other classmates who had the same happen to them.

Left the exam feeling horrible, like I had guessed on about 1/3 of the questions. Class grades were mostly pass, with a few HP and one Honors.
 
Last edited:
Who tested on 7/10/14??
I feel AWFUL.
I worked so hard and did so many practice tests but I felt the real deal was VERY different. I felt blindsided.

Anyone else?


Can you please what was tested heavily in the exam and what you would have done differently if you had the time. What about anatomy?? Did you think fa and u world are enough if note do you recommend any particular topics.I have my test nnext week .Sorry about too many questions.
 
Yes because everyone's honest about their scores on SDN right? lol

If that's true then the average step 1 score on SDN is >245

I think I speak for everyone when I say that we don't care enough about your opinion to lie to you about our step scores
 
Any one know around what time they expect to release scores from exams taken the last week of June? I'm too lazy to look through the thread. Sorry 🙁
 
Any one know around what time they expect to release scores from exams taken the last week of June? I'm too lazy to look through the thread. Sorry 🙁

11am EST on Wednesday has been the standard (check if your permit link is gone on that NBME login and if it is, it'll be at 11am EST this Wednesday)
 
11am EST on Wednesday has been the standard (check if your permit link is gone on that NBME login and if it is, it'll be at 11am EST this Wednesday)
Thanks. So far no "score report date" listed. Oh well. I should be more patient I guess.
 
People have been walking out of the exam feeling like crap for at least the last 2 years (which is how long I've been following the step I forum here). It's nothing new.

What's odd is that I never finished an NBME feeling like "crap", yet my actual score surpassed those of my NBMEs. No idea how any of this works.
 
After taking the test and talking to classmates, I think it's worth stating on SDN that Step 1 seems to be heavy on heme/onc (know your anemias well!) and clinical anatomy. Know your vasculature and anastamoses (and not just the easy portal HTN vessels). Lastly, know your arm/hand and leg/foot anatomy (muscles, carpal fractures, etc). They seem to be common questions that no one really focuses on. Guaranteed to get a few extra points from this stuff.

Good luck and thank you SDN for everything over the years.

I would disagree. You need to know everything. Focusing on one area is a good way to get yourself in trouble. Some people will get well distributed exams, others will get one that is heavy in a specific area. There is no way to predict which yours will be. It's in everyone's best interest, IMO, to just continue studying whatever you've been studying and try to go in as well rounded as possible. Of course, if you have weaknesses, then you should clear those up.

I had a lot of anatomy on my exam, but I wouldn't change anything about the way I prepped because of it.
 
Can you please what was tested heavily in the exam and what you would have done differently if you had the time. What about anatomy?? Did you think fa and u world are enough if note do you recommend any particular topics.I have my test nnext week .Sorry about too many questions.

If you scroll through the past 3-5 pages you will answer all those questions and more.
 
Top