Are you going to study full time until October? I don't get it. Your schedule is hard to follow and therefore hard to critique. As for your resources I would ditch Becker (whatever that is) and go for Kaplan qbank instead. Instead of both goljan and pathoma, just pick one. Also, doing qbanks subject specific may be advisable in the beginning if your knowledge base is poor in the specific area, but otherwise I think you are just putting yourself at a disadvantage. You must learn to think in terms of differential diagnoses which may not be organ specific (eg. kartageners syndrome vs cystic fibrosis).
Thanks for the feedback!
Just to expound a little more on my plans, I've been at it for almost a year now (no qbanks), I've scoured through FA2014 at least 3x, and practically rewrote the whole book (selected parts of course) on long bond paper leaving a lot of space for annotations. As far as analytic thinking, I've just started with Qbanks to build onto my base FA stuff. Now I have a copy of FA2016, and I didn't bother to write the new 2016 info into my notes, I chose to just keep the hard copy and annotate into the new info in the book as the need arises (and I'll review both my notes and quick read FA2016 - redundancy of info might breed familiarity).
I chose to do Becker and Rx, alternating organ blocks, doing a block of GIT in Rx, reviewing it, then doing a block from Becker and reviewing that. Ultimately, GIT info. from each Qbank overlap, and reinforce each other as I progressively complete all GIT questions from both banks. This moves quickly as the info overlaps, so I'm able to get through and review/annotate into my notes- about 4 blocks a day (2 from each bank). My %'s started in the 40%s then ended up to ~70% towards the 8-10th blocks. I'm done GIT, now onto cardio. I decided that doing organs first was okay since I roughly estimated (conservatively, ample time for each organ), that I could complete this process and have at least ~2 months left for UWorld. This would let me sit the exam by Oct.
As for Becker- They have a complete review course (pretty pricey) and I have a friend that proceeded to take it in Texas starting May. I was supposed to join him, but opted out d/t funds, so to prevent my FOMO, I signed up for their Qbank instead. It has mixed reviews here on SDN, but I wanted something regarding Qbanks to discuss/review with my friend.
I'm well aware about the value that going through Kaplan Qbank has- you have a valid point on that. I'm now considering a switch from Becker to Kaplan, starting with Cardio (might also be able to quickly knock out all the GIT Q's in a day, since info is still fresh in my mind). Thanks a lot!
- Pathoma and Goljan:
Since I'm going by organ, the concept of redundancy plays a role here. Going by organ allows me to review Pathoma (shorter) and build upon it with corresponding organ chapter(s) in Goljan (longer) = relatively quick review time considering it's 2 resources. Add in my condensed notes from FA and the 2 Qbanks, I feel even more confident with the info. Imagine seeing the comparison of [Crohn's VS Ulcerative Colitis] over and over from FA, Qbank Q's/explanations, Pathoma then Goljan. It's basically overkill, but a good kind I'd say. Goljan gets into a lot of minutiae, but when my intuition (from doing Q's) kicks in and says it ain't important, I just skip over it. But I really appreciate the tables in Goljan, they are great.
- I know that doing Q's in random is best, but I don't think my med school and going through FAx3 have left me with a strong foundation, so I opted to do Organs first. Can anyone comment on Organ-based review VS Subject-based review (i.e. Biochem, Immuno etc.)?