Official 2016 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Transposony

Do or do not, There is no try
10+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
1,810
Reaction score
999
Last edited:
Finished USMLE today. Overall I do not think like it was bad (of course there are going to be what in tha...?s) It seemed like a nice blend between a UWorld Exam and a NBME. Anyone else?
 
Last edited:
... totally agreed. I'd rather take the USMLE twice again rather than the COMLEX once. What a horrible exam. So many subjects weren't even touched while others were dissected into minutiae.

In my feedback I basically told them to shove it and learn from the USMLE folks about how to write an exam. :bored:

I took COMLEX last week and Step 1 today, and I completely agree. COMLEX was unlike anything I'd seen before, but Step 1 was a lot like NBME 17 for me.
 
Finished COMLEX today, I found the test way easier than USMLE. It was purely a micro/EKG/MSK/neuro exam. I wish I went over the dermatophytes prior to taking the exam, but other than that I DEFINITELY thought it was easier.

However, I felt way more worn out after the COMLEX than after the USMLE. This exam is a friggin marathon compared to USMLE, and the timing is utterly stupid. Just the dumbest set up ever, why does taking a piss or getting a drink of water have to cut into my block time if it isn't done during the "allotted" break time. The timing system with the USMLE is infinitely better.

All in all, I don't feel so bad about the COMLEX. However, I'm sweating bullets over the USMLE. Just mentally preparing myself for failing to meet that vision of a 250+ score.

Well, at least you now have only one test to worry about. I feel I was raped on both tests.
 
Hi, US IMG here. Taking the test on June 24th, needed some advice. Sorry for the long post in advance.

So here is the progression of my scores over past 2 weeks:

5/29: UWSA 1 222, before starting random timed blocks UW (did some 600 of them subject wise with a study partner before that)
6/5: Nbme 11 232
6/9: Nbme 12/13 back to back=245/249
6/11: Nbme 15 256
6/13: Nbme 16 251
6/15: Nbme 17 262

Yesterday I took UWSA 2 and got 249.

Found the drop from nbme 17 kind of strange. But then again, I only did like half of UW so maybe that's why. I think UWSA just tests UW knowledge. Found nbme style questions way easier than the twisted UW questions. Will take nbme 18 tomorrow so maybe that will give me an accurate estimate?

After nbme 18, should I finish up UW or just make a complete pass through my annotated FA? In between each nbme I've just been reviewing wrong answers and weaknesses and skimming through the pertinent nbme discussions on SDN.

Also, is it worth taking a Prometric practice session and if so, how many days before the test should I schedule it?
 
Hi, US IMG here. Taking the test on June 24th, needed some advice. Sorry for the long post in advance.

So here is the progression of my scores over past 2 weeks:

5/29: UWSA 1 222, before starting random timed blocks UW (did some 600 of them subject wise with a study partner before that)
6/5: Nbme 11 232
6/9: Nbme 12/13 back to back=245/249
6/11: Nbme 15 256
6/13: Nbme 16 251
6/15: Nbme 17 262

Yesterday I took UWSA 2 and got 249.

Found the drop from nbme 17 kind of strange. But then again, I only did like half of UW so maybe that's why. I think UWSA just tests UW knowledge. Found nbme style questions way easier than the twisted UW questions. Will take nbme 18 tomorrow so maybe that will give me an accurate estimate?

After nbme 18, should I finish up UW or just make a complete pass through my annotated FA? In between each nbme I've just been reviewing wrong answers and weaknesses and skimming through the pertinent nbme discussions on SDN.

Also, is it worth taking a Prometric practice session and if so, how many days before the test should I schedule it?

Yeah you have nothing to worry about.
 
Thanks, that's reassuring. Regarding my other question, what do you think will help me more in these last 6 to 7 days: more UW or a pass through my annotated FA? And is scheduling a practice session worth it?

To find an open center and take the test as soon as possible. You scored a 262 on NBME 17. Take it now.
 
To find an open center and take the test as soon as possible. You scored a 262 on NBME 17. Take it now.
I'm going to have to pay a rescheduling fee if I do that so not too keen. Also, I heard that nbme 18 is way more difficult than all the other nbmes so thought I'd take it first. What was your test more similar to?
 
I took the test about two months ago, but figured I would go ahead and do a write-up because other people's experiences really helped me prepare.

During the first year of medical school, I didn't even think about Step 1. This was a good decision in hind sight as I felt as if I would have burnt myself out. About a month into second year, I purchased the USMLE RX Q bank and began doing questions at my leisure. I also purchased a copy of First Aid 2015 and Pathoma. I began following along in my classes with these texts. Fortunately at our school we don't have grades, so I could focus more of my time on prepping for Step 1. For most of my blocks I just re-read the relevant First Aid sections several times to learn the material for school. I used this technique for most of my classes during second year up until the dedicated study period (and still managed to pass my classes).

I purchased UWORLD about two months into second year. I started UWORLD after going through about half of USMLE RX. My goal was to finish UWORLD twice, do a complete pass of First Aid, and use the rest of USMLE RX as well as Kaplan Q bank for supplemental questions. Below I list an overview of the sources that I used:

First Aid 2015: This is obviously a must have source for boards prep. A lot of students look at this book and immediately freak themselves out because there is "no way I can memorize the whole thing." Of course you can't memorize all of First Aid. The point is to be familiar enough with the concepts in order to answer questions correctly. I read the book from cover to cover once and also used it to brush up on concepts while going through UWORLD.
Pathoma: Dr. Sattar is amazing and I highly recommend this material. I watched all of the lectures once and then went over the book a second time without listening to the lectures.
USMLE World: Everyone knows this is the gold standard so no need to elaborate here. My first pass resulted in a 70% average, the second pass was a 90% average.
USMLE RX: The question bank is simply to easy. However it was good for learning as much of First Aid as possible. I finished about half of the questions.
Kaplan Q Bank: The questions are made difficult in a really annoying unnecessary way. I don't recommend using this q bank. I finished about one quarter of the questions.

I scored a 237 on the CBSE administered by my school after about a month of studying. I was happy with that because I knew I could reach my goal of 250 with some more work. Here are the rest of my practice test scores:

NBME 11: 239
NBME 12: 237
NBME 13: 256
NBME 15: 249
NBME 16: 247

The actual test was somewhere between the NBME exams and UWORLD in terms of difficulty. I had a lot of neurology, microbiology, pharmacology, and pathology. The ethics and biostats questions were straight forward. Some blocks were harder then others but I walked out knowing that I probably scored north of a 240.

The question everyone asks is "how many can I get wrong and get x score?" Obviously, nobody knows the answer to this question. Your mind plays tricks on you after you take the exam. I was constantly remembering questions I got wrong and beating myself up for the next few weeks after the test. I knew for a fact that I missed at least 20 (and am sure I missed many, many more), and many of the ones I knew I missed were stupid mistakes which made it worse. My advice to you is do not play this game. Simply wait until your score comes out as it will most likely be within your practice test range. I woke up on a glorious Wednesday morning three weeks later to reveal my score report:

Real Deal: 250+

The three main pieces of advice that I can give anyone studying for this exam are as follows: First off, do not over think questions. The exam is about knowing the basics really well. There were a few questions I know I missed from simply not believing that the question could be so easy and then subsequently picking the incorrect more complicated answer. Second, I found that it is always best to really spend the time learning concepts as opposed to route memorization. Questions on test day will always be new and unfamiliar and really having a solid understanding in basic pharmacology/physiology/pathology will take you much further than memorizing a table. Lastly, don't beat yourself up after the exam. I know the wait is hard. Just have faith that if you have been scoring well on practice tests you will most likely get a similar score.

I know I'm not one of those 260+ superstars, but if anyone wants advice on how to break the 250 mark feel free to send me a PM.
 
Last edited:
The ones that stick out the most were ones that involved asking how to treat commonly hit on pathogens in sketchy, but none of the drugs they taught in sketchy were options, or even in the same class of drug, made guessing challenging.
I predicted this would happen some time ago: NBME would eventually revise their questions and catch up to Sketchy, just like they caught up to Pathoma.

To find an open center and take the test as soon as possible. You scored a 262 on NBME 17. Take it now.
No, this is not how the USMLE works. If he wants the best opportunity at hitting 260+ on the real deal, he should continue to study until his scheduled test date. This will give himself the highest probability at securing the score he wants. One 262 on an NBME is not an indicator that you are actually a strong candidate for that score on the real deal. If he has scored 260+ on multiple NBMEs, I'd say his pre-test probability for reaching 260+ might be >40%, but he hasn't. Based on his NBMEs, and based on my own personal experience and thoughts about the predictive ability of these practice tests, he is generally capable of scoring in a range of 232-262. His NBME average of 249 pushes him toward the mid-upper-end of this range, so I'd say his chances on the real deal are approximately:

40-60% - 232-250
30-40% - 240-255
10-30% - 255+

I hope I'm wrong. I hope this guy quotes me in a few months saying he crushed my predictions and broke 265. However, all I'm trying to get at with this post is that to tell someone who you don't know that he should rush into the most important exam of their life just because they scored well on one recent NBME is a bad advice when their track record does not indicate 260 range. He should gradually approach test day, each day fine-tuning his weaknesses and sharpening his strengths, all while mentally preparing for the big day. To spend any extra money to move his test date up would do nothing to his pre-test chances of scoring 260+. However, another week of UWorld and mental preparation may boost him to 30-50% chance at scoring 260+, especially given his upward trend.

By your logic, I should have taken step 1 after my 2nd day of dedicated, when I scored 258 on NBME 11. If I took the exam at that time, based on my CBSE (98/260+) and scores in MS1/MS2, I probably had a pre-test chance of 260+ of roughly 40-60%. However, after weeks of studying, mentally preparing, and consistently scoring 260+ on every subsequent NBME and UWSA, my pre-test probability of scoring 260+ was probably closer to 70-90%. As you can see, I increased my chances, so that when I actually took the exam I was able to score where I wanted to even though I had merely a slightly above average test day. If I had rushed into taking the exam after scoring a 258 on NBME 11, weeks before my scheduled date (like you would have suggested), my "slightly above average test day" at the time may have only yielded a 250-260 (great score, but not what I wanted).

Also, is it worth taking a Prometric practice session and if so, how many days before the test should I schedule it?
100%. Schedule 3-7 days before if you can. Also, don't worry about your UWorld score predictions. The NBMEs are the only accurate predictors unless you are in 260+ range on UWSAs, then those are relatively correlative.

This is all my own opinion and speculation, please take it with a grain of salt. Good luck.
 
Last edited:
I predicted this would happen some time ago: NBME would eventually revise their questions and catch up to Sketchy, just like they caught up to Pathoma.


No, this is not how the USMLE works. If he wants the best opportunity at hitting 260+ on the real deal, he should continue to study until his scheduled test date. This will give himself the highest probability at securing the score he wants. One 262 on an NBME is not an indicator that you are actually a strong candidate for that score on the real deal. If he has scored 260+ on multiple NBMEs, I'd say his pre-test probability for reaching 260+ might be >40%, but he hasn't. Based on his NBMEs, and based on my own personal experience and thoughts about the predictive ability of these practice tests, he is generally capable of scoring in a range of 232-262. His NBME average of 249 pushes him toward the mid-upper-end of this range, so I'd say his chances on the real deal are approximately:

40-60% - 232-250
30-40% - 240-255
10-30% - 255+

I hope I'm wrong. I hope this guy quotes me in a few months saying he crushed my predictions and broke 265. However, all I'm trying to get at with this post is that to tell someone you don't know that he should rush into the most important exam of their life just because they scored well on one recent NBME is a bad advice when their track record does not indicate 260 range. He should gradually approach test day, each day fine-tuning his weaknesses and sharpening his strengths, all while mentally preparing for the big day. To spend any extra money to move his test date up would do nothing to his pre-test chances of scoring 260+. However, another week of UWorld and mental preparation may boost him to 30-50% chance at scoring 260+.

By your logic, I should have taken step 1 after my 2nd day of dedicated, when I scored 258 on NBME 11. If I took the exam at that time, based on my CBSE (98/260+) and scores in MS1/MS2, I probably had a pre-test chance of 260+ of roughly 40-60%. However, after weeks of studying, mentally preparing, and consistently scoring 260+ on every subsequent NBME and UWSA, my pre-test probability of scoring 260+ was probably closer to 70-90%. As you can see, I increased my chances, so that when I actually took the exam I was able to score where I wanted to even though I had merely a slightly above average test day. If I had rushed into taking the exam after scoring a 258 on NBME 11, weeks before my scheduled date (like you would have suggested), my "slightly above average test day" at the time may have only yielded a 250-260 (great score, but not what I wanted).


100%. Schedule 3-7 days before if you can. Also, don't worry about your UWorld score predictions. The NBMEs are the only accurate predictors unless you are in 260+ range on UWSAs, then those are relatively correlative.

This is all my own opinion and speculation, please take it with a grain of salt. Good luck.

Thank you so much for taking the time to write such a long and detailed reply @plasmodium !! Yeah, that's what I'm concerned about. I'm aiming for a couple specific combined programs at competitive centers, and while I have a decent CV, I am still an IMG, so I'll need an excellent score for that interview invite. So you suggest more UW?

P.S. Just FYI, (since you referred to me as a "he") I'm female. :laugh:
 
Thank you so much for taking the time to write such a long and detailed reply @plasmodium !! Yeah, that's what I'm concerned about. I'm aiming for a couple specific combined programs at competitive centers, and while I have a decent CV, I am still an IMG, so I'll need an excellent score for that interview invite. So you suggest more UW?
I'm an IMG as well. I suggest you do exactly whatever you've been doing that has caused you to upward trend. Test day performance will be the primary determining factor of where within your pre-test range you end up scoring. The most important thing for you to do at this point is to stay level-headed, focused, calm, and confident.
 
Lol, of course. The whole time I was considering putting "he or she" and when I decide not to you end up being a girl.

PM me with any further questions. Otherwise, good luck.

No problem haha. And again, thanks so much! (I think I attempted to send you a pm, hope it succeeded.)
 
The three main pieces of advice that I can give anyone studying for this exam are as follows: First off, do not over think questions. The exam is about knowing the basics really well. There were a few questions I know I missed from simply not believing that the question could be so easy and then subsequently picking the incorrect more complicated answer. Second, I found that it is always best to really spend the time learning concepts as opposed to route memorization. Questions on test day will always be new and unfamiliar and really having a solid understanding in basic pharmacology/physiology/pathology will take you much further than memorizing a table. Lastly, don't beat yourself up after the exam. I know the wait is hard. Just have faith that if you have been scoring well on practice tests you will most likely get a similar score.

These are all excellent advice! I agree with everything you've said.
 
Hi, US IMG here. Taking the test on June 24th, needed some advice. Sorry for the long post in advance.

So here is the progression of my scores over past 2 weeks:

5/29: UWSA 1 222, before starting random timed blocks UW (did some 600 of them subject wise with a study partner before that)
6/5: Nbme 11 232
6/9: Nbme 12/13 back to back=245/249
6/11: Nbme 15 256
6/13: Nbme 16 251
6/15: Nbme 17 262

Yesterday I took UWSA 2 and got 249.


Hey could you please tell me what u did for the 30 point jump in 10 days? Is it just by doing Uworld?
Considering you've done both subject wise/random, which is more beneficial?

Good Luck for the test😉
 
Just finished Comlex, I Res ipsa loquitur all over that bad boy. worst test I've ever taken, I'd rather take USMLE anyday. There is no way to prepare for the amount of randomness on that test.
juuuuust great. that's what I heard from people who took it last year. I'm sure you killed it, and now you can enjoy some sleep and sun! Congrats on being done!
 
Can anyone suggest some help or resources on the type of laboratory testing? The mnemonic SNW DRP just isn't cutting it for me, (literally batting 0% with these)
 
Can anyone suggest some help or resources on the type of laboratory testing? The mnemonic SNW DRP just isn't cutting it for me, (literally batting 0% with these)

- [Western]ers have a [protein] rich diet
- [Southern]ers like to mix their [DNA] ---- In US there is joke about how some people in Southeastern united states marry their siblings (aka mix DNA); Incase you're not in US
- This just leaves North which has to be RNA. Dont have a mnemonic for this one.
 
- [Western]ers have a [protein] rich diet
- [Southern]ers like to mix their [DNA] ---- In US there is joke about how some people in Southeastern united states marry their siblings (aka mix DNA); Incase you're not in US
- This just leaves North which has to be RNA. Dont have a mnemonic for this one.
Haha, I think about it in a similar way.
My west coast friends are obsessed with eating tons of protein. Ya know, beach bods and all that.
Southerners might have to go on Maury to have their DNA tested.
And for north I also have nothing.

Basically, try to think of some geographic stereotypes and it works pretty well. 😉
 
I predicted this would happen some time ago: NBME would eventually revise their questions and catch up to Sketchy, just like they caught up to Pathoma.

This is more of a general question to everyone. If they 'caught up to' Pathoma and Sketchy, does it make these resources useless? I take the exam in August and this is a particularly scary thing to read about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AZ7
I'm an IMG as well. I suggest you do exactly whatever you've been doing that has caused you to upward trend. Test day performance will be the primary determining factor of where within your pre-test range you end up scoring. The most important thing for you to do at this point is to stay level-headed, focused, calm, and confident.

Seasoned veteran right there
 
Jumping on the bandwagon of "the real thing felt nothing like (and much worse than) practice tests" but hoping everyone is correct when they say you score close to your practice NBMEs.

NBME 16 - 247
NBME 17 - 248
NBME 18 - 259
Will let you know how the real thing went...
 
- [Western]ers have a [protein] rich diet
- [Southern]ers like to mix their [DNA] ---- In US there is joke about how some people in Southeastern united states marry their siblings (aka mix DNA); Incase you're not in US
- This just leaves North which has to be RNA. Dont have a mnemonic for this one.
great! Thank you so much for the help! I'm from a southeastern state so I won't miss the mix DNA now haha
 
How does SNOW DROP not work for you? It literally tells you what you need to know.

S = Southern = DNA
N = Northern = RNA
W = Western = Protein
I've noticed that the wording can get way more complicated when picking answer choices. This is not only m for these procedure questions. So many times in the questions you can instantly id the diagnosis or problem only to look at the answer choices and have no idea what the answer is bc they manage to rephrase something in a such a way that you can't just figure it out. That's my major problem with so many of the questions
 
This is more of a general question to everyone. If they 'caught up to' Pathoma and Sketchy, does it make these resources useless? I take the exam in August and this is a particularly scary thing to read about.

I wouldn't say they are useless. Definitely frustrating when you get questions that are focused on material NOT covered in Sketchy and Pathoma, but from my experience, I still got some things correct because of Sketchy and Pathoma (just a lot less than I'd hoped)
 
I've noticed that the wording can get way more complicated when picking answer choices. This is not only m for these procedure questions. So many times in the questions you can instantly id the diagnosis or problem only to look at the answer choices and have no idea what the answer is bc they manage to rephrase something in a such a way that you can't just figure it out. That's my major problem with so many of the questions

Right, but that doesn't change the fact that the poster wanted a new mnemonic for lab tests, and someone posted a more convoluted mnemonic to memorize what SNOW DROP tells you...
 
Right, but that doesn't change the fact that the poster wanted a new mnemonic for lab tests, and someone posted a more convoluted mnemonic to memorize what SNOW DROP tells you...

that's so true. I was just sayin how many of the ones I see tend to be this way ..so wanted insight on how to handle those type of questions I've mentioned. it can be so frustrating :inpain:
 
I'm taking the exam in 4 days. At this point, I'm super burnt out in my studying and feel like I keep forgetting the same information. My question for those who have already taken the exam is this: how prepared should I be feeling in order to get a score of 220+?
For reference my last two NBME scores have been 226 four weeks ago and a 234 last week. I can't help but feel like these scores were flukes since I definitely did not feel confident in most of my answers, and was mostly make educated guesses. Thanks for your responses!
 
I'm taking the exam in 4 days. At this point, I'm super burnt out in my studying and feel like I keep forgetting the same information. My question for those who have already taken the exam is this: how prepared should I be feeling in order to get a score of 220+?
For reference my last two NBME scores have been 226 four weeks ago and a 234 last week. I can't help but feel like these scores were flukes since I definitely did not feel confident in most of my answers, and was mostly make educated guesses. Thanks for your responses!

Sounds like you are on the right track. Depending on which version you get for the real deal and how confident/focused you are on the test day, you can even aim for 240 range.

Keep doing UFAP until the end. I totally know how you feel--my last week leading up to the real deal was the most painful period of my dedicated. Write down things that you feel you keep forgetting and maybe review that a day before the real deal to refresh your mind. Trust your board prep and, more importantly, trust yourself. Staying confident and believing in yourself are more important than knowing a few more extra facts at this point.
 
UWSA1: 250
NBME 12: 254 (5/10)
NBME 13: 254 (5/20)
NBME 15: 266 (5/29)
NBME 16: 260 (6/05)
UWSA2: 266 (6/11)
Kaplan Sim 1: 83% (6/13)
NBME 17: 260 (6/16)
Kaplan Sim 2: 80% (6/18)
NBME 18: Taking it 6/20

Test 6/23, this thursday.

The most recent Kaplan sim has definitely crushed my confidence, and I'm sure that I'll underperform my NBME averages. I shouldn't be complaining, but I want to break 260. Any thoughts @plasmodium ?
 
Sounds like you are on the right track. Depending on which version you get for the real deal and how confident/focused you are on the test day, you can even aim for 240 range.

Keep doing UFAP until the end. I totally know how you feel--my last week leading up to the real deal was the most painful period of my dedicated. Write down things that you feel you keep forgetting and maybe review that a day before the real deal to refresh your mind. Trust your board prep and, more importantly, trust yourself. Staying confident and believing in yourself are more important than knowing a few more extra facts at this point.

Thanks so much for your response! I can't wait for this to be over!
 
Guys I'm having a really bad day (week). I feel like I am anxious about every stupid thing that could go wrong in LIFE, and not studying. Is this what burn out feels like? Can anyone else relate to this? Any tips on how to get back on track/studying?
 
Guys I'm having a really bad day (week). I feel like I am anxious about every stupid thing that could go wrong in LIFE, and not studying. Is this what burn out feels like? Can anyone else relate to this? Any tips on how to get back on track/studying?

You can't study if you don't take care of both your physical and mental health. Make sure you are sleeping, exercising, and eating well.
 
UWSA1: 250
NBME 12: 254 (5/10)
NBME 13: 254 (5/20)
NBME 15: 266 (5/29)
NBME 16: 260 (6/05)
UWSA2: 266 (6/11)
Kaplan Sim 1: 83% (6/13)
NBME 17: 260 (6/16)
Kaplan Sim 2: 80% (6/18)
NBME 18: Taking it 6/20

Test 6/23, this thursday.

The most recent Kaplan sim has definitely crushed my confidence, and I'm sure that I'll underperform my NBME averages. I shouldn't be complaining, but I want to break 260. Any thoughts @plasmodium ?
Hi there. Let's see.

NBME range 254-266 with notable up trending scores (mid 250s to consistent 260+)
NBME average: 259

I'd say your chances are something like:

10-30% - 240-254 (this range earned itself a bigger percentage than it should have based on your NBME predictions solely because of your attitude. "I'm sure that I'll underperform my NBME averages." The fk? You need to grab this bull by the horns and look it dead in the eye on test day otherwise you can kiss that 260 goodbye. Fix your attitude and adapt a more confident mindset and the 10-30% will become 0%.)
20-40% - 254-260
40-60% - 260+

Keep it up and don't even consider Kaplan Simulated Exams as truly predictive. If you were to consider them, 80%+ is great. Just be happy you got to see some novel questions and have confirmed that you are able to make it through an 8 hour exam.
 
New account for the sake of anonymity.

Nbme 13 258
Nbme 17 266
Nbme 18 266
Uwsa1 >270
Uwsa2 266
Kaplan self 1 83%
Kaplan self 2 82%
UW qbank 86%

I took this exam last week, I definetly felt like it was hard while I was in there. I flagged 17 questions per section, on second pass got it down to about 7-9 flagged, with 1-2 wtf questions per section. Seemed to really test your higher level understanding by giving information in abstract ways.

Overall everything seemed well balanced, I can't say one section was tested more than another except for maybe pathophysiology. Timing didnt seem to be an issue. It was definitely more difficult than the Nbme exams, more like the Uwsa. Although the comlex I took later last week was a complete **** show, so vague and picky, I would take usmle any day, but I will post more in the comlex thread.

I havent any clue how well I did, I honestly feel it could go anyway. I could only remember about 5 questions, so I couldnt really check any answers. It seems strange that I studied tirelessly day after day, month after month and all it led to was a brief one day exam. This will be a long wait. I don't want to drag this out so if any of you are interested in how I studied or have questions leave a comment.
 
New account for the sake of anonymity.

Nbme 13 258
Nbme 17 266
Nbme 18 266
Uwsa1 >270
Uwsa2 266
Kaplan self 1 83%
Kaplan self 2 82%
UW qbank 86%

I took this exam last week, I definetly felt like it was hard while I was in there. I flagged 17 questions per section, on second pass got it down to about 7-9 flagged, with 1-2 wtf questions per section. Seemed to really test your higher level understanding by giving information in abstract ways.

Overall everything seemed well balanced, I can't say one section was tested more than another except for maybe pathophysiology. Timing didnt seem to be an issue. It was definitely more difficult than the Nbme exams, more like the Uwsa. Although the comlex I took later last week was a complete **** show, so vague and picky, I would take usmle any day, but I will post more in the comlex thread.

I havent any clue how well I did, I honestly feel it could go anyway. I could only remember about 5 questions, so I couldnt really check any answers. It seems strange that I studied tirelessly day after day, month after month and all it led to was a brief one day exam. This will be a long wait. I don't want to drag this out so if any of you are interested in how I studied or have questions leave a comment.

I know. I wish we could get a "preliminary" score at the end of the day. Unfortunately I remember about 60% of the questions from the test so I have been checking my answers. I don't know why I do this to myself. I have to get motivated for COMLEX though. It's so tempting to just cram OMM for 48 hrs and not review anything else (COMLEX wednesday). I am not looking forward to that marathon. The timing on the usmle was amazing. It is such a well constructed test.
 
New account for the sake of anonymity.

Nbme 13 258
Nbme 17 266
Nbme 18 266
Uwsa1 >270
Uwsa2 266
Kaplan self 1 83%
Kaplan self 2 82%
UW qbank 86%

I took this exam last week, I definetly felt like it was hard while I was in there. I flagged 17 questions per section, on second pass got it down to about 7-9 flagged, with 1-2 wtf questions per section. Seemed to really test your higher level understanding by giving information in abstract ways.

Overall everything seemed well balanced, I can't say one section was tested more than another except for maybe pathophysiology. Timing didnt seem to be an issue. It was definitely more difficult than the Nbme exams, more like the Uwsa. Although the comlex I took later last week was a complete **** show, so vague and picky, I would take usmle any day, but I will post more in the comlex thread.

I havent any clue how well I did, I honestly feel it could go anyway. I could only remember about 5 questions, so I couldnt really check any answers. It seems strange that I studied tirelessly day after day, month after month and all it led to was a brief one day exam. This will be a long wait. I don't want to drag this out so if any of you are interested in how I studied or have questions leave a comment.
Are you talking about the test on 17th and if yes I thought the same thing about difficulty
 
You're assuming Step 1 scores follow a normal curve. They do not. Rather, they have a strong negative skew. I'm not sure what the exact percentile for 270 will be this year, but I find it hard to believe it will be anything less than 99th percentile anytime in the near future.
It has a relatively normal distribution for US MDs. Foreign test takers and DOs heavily skew the average score PDs see negatively, however, as they score lower and are not factored into the score distribution that is published.
 
This is more of a general question to everyone. If they 'caught up to' Pathoma and Sketchy, does it make these resources useless? I take the exam in August and this is a particularly scary thing to read about.
I didn't use Pathoma or Sketchy, can't comment directly about using them.

Understanding the basics of these resources will definitely help you if they help you learn, but it takes more than these resources to score high IMO. Others will surely disagree, so take what I say with a grain of salt. The content in Pathoma/Sketchy is selectively chosen and presented based on the content that appeared on previous USMLE forms. As the NBME finds out about these resources, it seems they start to omit the buzz words that were previously tested, and ask about this information in more roundabout ways. If you are a good test taker it shouldn't matter because you can decipher the roundabout description and associate it with the buzz word. However, most people aren't on this level, so it hurts them when they're asked about papillary thyroid carcinoma and Orphan Annie Eye nuclei isn't plainly written out for them in the question stem.

UWorld and FA should cover at least 70% of whatever else you will need. The rest (ie, what separates 240 scorers from 260 scorers) is determined by MS1/MS2 knowledge and test day performance.
 
Last edited:
I didn't use Pathoma or Sketchy, can't comment directly about using them.

Understanding the basics of these resources will definitely help you if they help you learn, but it takes more than these resources to score high IMO. Others will surely disagree, so take what I say with a grain of salt. The content in Pathoma/Sketchy is selectively chosen and presented based on the content that appeared on previous USMLE forms. As the NBME finds out about these resources, it seems they start to omit the buzz words that were previously tested, and ask about this information in more roundabout ways. If you are a good test taker it shouldn't matter because you can decipher the roundabout description and associate it with the buzz word. However, most people aren't on this level, so it hurts them when they're asked about papillary thyroid carcinoma and Orphan Annie Eye nuclei isn't plainly written out for them in the question stem.

UWorld and FA should cover at least 70% of whatever else you will need. The rest (ie, what separates 240 scorers from 260 scorers) is determined by MS1/MS2 knowledge and test day performance.

Do you really think there is some NBME conspiracy to UFAP? :ninja: That would be insane! Does anyone else think so?

Could you please shed some more light and elaborate on what you mean by being a good test taker and test day performance? How do people get to the level you are talking about when deciphering questions?
 
Do you really think there is some NBME conspiracy to UFAP? :ninja: That would be insane! Does anyone else think so?

Could you please shed some more light and elaborate on what you mean by being a good test taker and test day performance? How do people get to the level you are talking about when deciphering questions?
Look at an exam like NBME 11 or the earlier ones - a lot of the "hard" questions back then are very obvious now because of resources like FA, Pathoma, etc. I don't think it's too "out there" to think that the NBME has been making their questions harder. I don't think it's a conspiracy, it's more like "there are better resources out there now, so we have to alter our questions to accommodate for previously-hard-now-easy questions."

Good test taking comes with not merely doing practice questions to see if you get them right and to read the explanations, but also with metacognitive observation of your own weaknesses. In terms of actually taking an exam, fine-tuned strategy (ie, not reading the question stem word-by-word starting from the first word, and not reading every question choice slowly word-by-word) and agility also play a large role. Some of this is natural ability (for example, I didn't really do practice questions until the 2nd half of MS2), but a lot of it comes with practice.

Test day performance is a conglomerate of confidence, anxiety control, knowledge foundation, and luck.
 
Look at an exam like NBME 11 or the earlier ones - a lot of the "hard" questions back then are very obvious now because of resources like FA,
This is true, unfortunately for us test takers. I noticed some of the older NBME questions, that would have otherwise been true WTF questions, were answerable because this information was updated in FA, etc. This made the exam overall seem "easier" as well, but concurrently tightened the scale.

I personally used sketchy, and thought it was useful to learn micro. When I got to the exam, I was disappointed to see that i had exactly zero questions that tested me on random trivial minutiae of microorganisms. If it was specific, it was more for the higher yield organisms and was information that was found in all resources. I also had a question which had 4 answer choices of bugs that weren't ever mentioned in sketchy (or uworld, or FA as a matter of fact). Made me think they are constantly updating and reviewing questions. They are probably reading this post right now, in fact.

It's not a "conspiracy," in the literal sense. It's just the test takers working to ensure the exam doesn't turn in a binge and purge exercise. And otherwise, we would be seeing perfect scores all the time on this board.
 
Top