is uw2 just not as predictive anymore?? i thought out of all exams its the best one but like now idk wats going on
Imho, the exam felt like 7 blocks of UW but had the curve of the NBMEs lol. For some people it clearly predicted, but a lot of us seemed to have a big drop. Interestingly, I know I got nearly every pharm question right cause it was legit all from sketchy, and my score report listed pharm as "same" rather than "higher" so maybe it was curved more harshy, but idk. It's all guesses at this point.
Congrats on being done man! Few questions for you if you dont mind:
Was 228 still in your 95%CI?
Were you doing UW on timed random?
How many qbanks did you do and did you do a lot of NBMEs?
What were your NBME scores leading up to test day?
228 was still in my 95% CI (my CI was 220-260 though so almost any score I would have gotten fell in that range).
I did UW on timed random, yes. I started with tutor mode but ended up switching to timed, random to start simulating the exam style more.
I did all of UW, and then did a little bit of amboss with time left. Only did 1 pass of UW (72% first pass). Started a second pass of the incorrects but those blocks were averaging 85-90% so I figured I knew my incorrects pretty well by that point. I then did some amboss questions which went fine (didn't do that many cause it was getting close to my exam)
NBMEs I did 16 (230), 21 (205), and 24 (215). I decided to stop paying $60 cause I felt it was ridiculous how much money I was paying to not get answer explanations and that the real exam was way closer to UW question details than the NBMEs. For what it's worth, I had one question from NBME 24 word-for-word on my exam (which I know I got right because I was complaining to people how stupid the answer choice was on the NBME).
My exam was really heavy on sketchy micro/pharm, and biochem. I knew all the biochem in pixorize which helped, but there was a respectable amount of it not covered in pixorize. If I had to redo it knowing what I do now, might have spent some more time in biochem, but legitimately my entire score report had nearly every subject performance listed as "same" instead of "higher" or "lower". That to me seemed to say I knew pretty much everything in respectable detail but nothing in an insanely detailed amount lol