- Joined
- Feb 6, 2007
- Messages
- 796
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 4,591
- Medical Student
Well it seems to be working well for Pickles and seraph is goading me on to make one, so here we go. I'm deciding between three great schools and having a really hard time. I tried the seraph method but that didn't work either. Oh, and for those of you who don't know I'm applying for an MD/PhD in the history of medicine. My interest area is history of cancer in the post-WWII period and clinically I am also interested in cancer, potentially radiation oncology (and yes, before you yell at me, I'm not picking a school based on rad onc). So here we go:
Penn
Pros:
1. Large MSTP
2. Have lots of non-trad MSTP students including 2 currently in history of medicine
3. Supportive administration
4. High stipend
5. Relatively inexpensive for a city
6. Can buy a condo
7. 1.5 year pre-clinical curriculum
8. Strong traditional historical training
9. Prestige (both med school and history faculty)
10. Strong research mentorship geared towards traditional historical research
11. J-weezy
12. History of medicine world based mostly on the east coast
13. Research mentors say I should go here
14. New cancer center
15. AMAZING match list
16. Strong Rad Onc Dept
17. Free stethoscope
Cons:
1. Philadelphia
2. No beach or mountains
3. Research mentorship not good for interdisciplinary historical research (public policy focused)
4. Weather
5. No MD/PhD historians on faculty
6. Med school only P/F for the first semester
7. More lecture time than other places (not a fan)
UCLA
Pros:
1. Los Angeles
2. Weather
3. Outdoor activities (beach, skiing, hiking)
4. VERY supportive administration
5. MD/PhD historian on faculty (MSTP director's husband)
6. Strong mentorship for interdisciplinary historical research (better for getting grant money)
7. Relaxed students
8. P/F medical curriculum
9. Strong cancer center
10. MSTP curriculum is very flexible
11. Medical school prestige
12. Very large history faculty
13. History PhD (not history of medicine) - could be better for marketability latter on although Penn's prestige makes up for this I think
14. Strong possibility for personal happiness
Cons:
1. Not as many mentors
2. Expensive
3. Can't afford a condo
4. Less strong for traditional historical research
5. Very weak rad onc dept (though students from UCLA have done well in the rad onc match in the past)
6. No other history MSTP students (but one doing philosophy and they are open to more)
7. No j-weezy
8. History of medicine world is across the country
Wisconsin
Pros:
1. Very good match for my research interests
2. Influential MD/PhD historian on faculty
3. Good mix of traditional and interdisciplinary historical research
4. Strong historical training
5. MSTP has one other history MD/PhD student
6. Inexpensive
7. Can buy a condo or house
8. Closer to family
9. Strong rad onc department
10. Close proximity to history of medicine world and research resources
11. Lots of outdoor activities
12. History department prestige
Cons:
1. Not a big city
2. Cold
3. Med school is focused on primary care not research/academic medicine
4. Regional matches for med students
5. Newer MSTP, someone told me they are "going through some growing pains"
6. MSTP administration is cautiously supportive of me
7. Med school has grades (A/B/C/D) yuck!
8. Med school/MSTP not as prestigious
9. Low stipend
10. No facebook groups where I can waste my free time!
So there we have it. I'm sure there are more things I didn't list. But this looks good enough to at least start a discussion. I'm revisiting all three places in the next month but I want to start thinking things through now. So, thoughts anyone? Thanks!
Penn
Pros:
1. Large MSTP
2. Have lots of non-trad MSTP students including 2 currently in history of medicine
3. Supportive administration
4. High stipend
5. Relatively inexpensive for a city
6. Can buy a condo
7. 1.5 year pre-clinical curriculum
8. Strong traditional historical training
9. Prestige (both med school and history faculty)
10. Strong research mentorship geared towards traditional historical research
11. J-weezy
12. History of medicine world based mostly on the east coast
13. Research mentors say I should go here
14. New cancer center
15. AMAZING match list
16. Strong Rad Onc Dept
17. Free stethoscope
Cons:
1. Philadelphia
2. No beach or mountains
3. Research mentorship not good for interdisciplinary historical research (public policy focused)
4. Weather
5. No MD/PhD historians on faculty
6. Med school only P/F for the first semester
7. More lecture time than other places (not a fan)
UCLA
Pros:
1. Los Angeles
2. Weather
3. Outdoor activities (beach, skiing, hiking)
4. VERY supportive administration
5. MD/PhD historian on faculty (MSTP director's husband)
6. Strong mentorship for interdisciplinary historical research (better for getting grant money)
7. Relaxed students
8. P/F medical curriculum
9. Strong cancer center
10. MSTP curriculum is very flexible
11. Medical school prestige
12. Very large history faculty
13. History PhD (not history of medicine) - could be better for marketability latter on although Penn's prestige makes up for this I think
14. Strong possibility for personal happiness
Cons:
1. Not as many mentors
2. Expensive
3. Can't afford a condo
4. Less strong for traditional historical research
5. Very weak rad onc dept (though students from UCLA have done well in the rad onc match in the past)
6. No other history MSTP students (but one doing philosophy and they are open to more)
7. No j-weezy
8. History of medicine world is across the country
Wisconsin
Pros:
1. Very good match for my research interests
2. Influential MD/PhD historian on faculty
3. Good mix of traditional and interdisciplinary historical research
4. Strong historical training
5. MSTP has one other history MD/PhD student
6. Inexpensive
7. Can buy a condo or house
8. Closer to family
9. Strong rad onc department
10. Close proximity to history of medicine world and research resources
11. Lots of outdoor activities
12. History department prestige
Cons:
1. Not a big city
2. Cold
3. Med school is focused on primary care not research/academic medicine
4. Regional matches for med students
5. Newer MSTP, someone told me they are "going through some growing pains"
6. MSTP administration is cautiously supportive of me
7. Med school has grades (A/B/C/D) yuck!
8. Med school/MSTP not as prestigious
9. Low stipend
10. No facebook groups where I can waste my free time!
So there we have it. I'm sure there are more things I didn't list. But this looks good enough to at least start a discussion. I'm revisiting all three places in the next month but I want to start thinking things through now. So, thoughts anyone? Thanks!
?
Like Iowa City, I love how easy day to day life is compared to a big hectic city with traffic, etc. It allows me to enjoy life more...