- Joined
- Jan 24, 2014
- Messages
- 1,362
- Reaction score
- 2,954
Tendonotification?
I shall hook a syringe full of air to the 18ga to bill a topaz type ablation.Tendonotification?
We are probably talking different things...
For FDL (and FDB) flexible lesser digit tuft ulcer, 18ga tendonotomy works fairly good... I agree. I probably bag an avg of 0.68 digital proper branches per proc, but yeah. Works well.
FHL with 18ga = sketchy at best. Not reliable. Not the right tool.
Plantar fascia meaningful 18ga release = not happening. Not effective.
It's definitely not impossible... it's just not the right tool....I have an instep plantar fasciotomy in a couple weeks. I’ll go ahead and have a rep record the fasciotomy while I do it with an 18ga instead of a #15 blade. Then we’ll listen to Feli explain to us how it’s still impossible for an 18ga to resect a portion of the plantar fascia.
FHL is still a decnt sized tendon and has irregular at best office results done perc (again, 18ga unreliable
Plantar fascia meaningful 18ga release = not happening.
The needles just get beat up FAST
#6200 beaver blades
Ive failed so many times with these little tiny ulcers. They just seem impossible to cure and im not a fan of kellers.I’ve done a few (maybe 12) of the distal plantar fasciotomies, with maybe 50% success rate. I think the failures I’ve seen were when I underestimated how rigid the deformity was or thought I had released it and didn’t fully.
I can confirm you can cut the fascia with an 18 g needle, as the last time I did it I checked it with our ultrasound machine because of my fear of not fully releasing it. To Felis point though, at times it took more than one needle and my hand felt like it was going to cramp.
I hate, hate, hate sub IPJ ulcers and don’t seem to have much luck offloading the bastards.
I’ve done a few (maybe 12) of the distal plantar fasciotomies, with probably 50% success rate. I think the failures I’ve seen were when I underestimated how rigid the deformity was or thought I had released it and didn’t fully.
I can confirm you can cut the fascia with an 18 g needle, as the last time I did it I checked it with our ultrasound machine. To Felis point though, at times it took more than one needle and my hand felt like it was going to cramp.
I hate, hate, hate sub IPJ ulcers and don’t seem to have much luck offloading the bastards.
That is because a IPJ ulcer is a surgical case.I’ve done a few (maybe 12) of the distal plantar fasciotomies, with maybe 50% success rate. I think the failures I’ve seen were when I underestimated how rigid the deformity was or thought I had released it and didn’t fully.
I can confirm you can cut the fascia with an 18 g needle, as the last time I did it I checked it with our ultrasound machine because of my fear of not fully releasing it. To Felis point though, at times it took more than one needle and my hand felt like it was going to cramp.
I hate, hate, hate sub IPJ ulcers and don’t seem to have much luck offloading the bastards.
Watch out next thing you know he will be telling you that you can do a lapidus with 2 screws and 1st mpj fusion with stainless steel plate and crossing screw .I’ve done maybe a dozen of these and far more flexor tenotomies with 18ga needles. The statements above are rather ignorant. You actually believe you are going to break an 18ga needle in the foot while swiping across the plantar fascia?
Thinking that a prefab is healing these people in my clinic (procedure is only done when they have already failed custom accommodative inserts and or daily felt offloading) is also pretty ignorant.
Feli is slowly morphing into bitter old TFP man around here 🙄
![]()
Or next level up... Treace Medical's Lapiplasty setsWatch out next thing you know he will be telling you that you can do a lapidus with 2 screws and 1st mpj fusion with stainless steel plate and crossing screw .
There are couple articles that support this. I think the pts that did well were the ones who had increased ROM of the first MTPJ after the plantar fascia release. Successful healing was in the 60% range which isn't great but better than Keller imo. Keller has had poor success in my hands.I'm not really understanding Feli's posts regarding this procedure.
These are all patients who have failed at least 3 months of traditional offloading methods with regular local wound care. In the right patient, it's a great, relatively low risk office procedure that saves the patient a trip to the OR. It is also significantly less aggressive than a keller or IPJ arthroplasty so less bridges are burned.
I've had probably a 70% success rate with the medial band plantar fasciotomy with an 18G needle. My personal series is around 10 patients. The medial band of the plantar fascia at the level of the base of the 1st metatarsal is nowhere near as thick as the plantar fascia at the instep/heel region of a traditional plantar fasciotomy. It is quite easy to cut it with the 18G needle and there is a palpable dell immediately postoperatively after successful completion of the fasciotomy. Postoperative my bandage involves a 1/2" steristrip and a bandaid. They go into a CAM boot for 4 weeks without any special offloading or other accommodation.
On average, I find that these heal within 4-6 weeks after the procedure. The average ulcer duration of these patients (who are usually referred to my clinic) is >6 months.
Apart from the clear contraindicated1st MTPJ arthritis/rigidus, the patients who have failed are those are have a severe pes planus component (even without arthritis), so I don't do it on those patients any more.
I just use a 15 blade and put one stitch in it. Local if pt has sensation. Nothing wrong with 18 gauge needle if it works in your hands.Don't disagree that all of these things CAN be done with an 18 Ga needle, but personally have never understood why people have wanted to screw around with doing tenotomies with them.
Save yourself some time and buy a pack of #6200 beaver blades. Same, if not smaller incision.
Also, from a practice standpoint, the times I have done a FT with a needle I couldn't help but feel it looked quite silly and wondered what I would think as a patient being billed for a "surgical procedure" as this dude roots around in my toe with a inch and a half needle..
There are couple articles that support this. I think the pts that did well were the ones who had increased ROM of the first MTPJ after the plantar fascia release. Successful healing was in the 60% range which isn't great but better than Keller imo. Keller has had poor success in my hands.
First plantar IPJ ulcers I do TAL, medial PF release and shave down phalanx. Walk in boot until ulcer heals and then diabetic shoes and inserts. Works alright.
I have stayed away from colors mainly just because the ipj arthroplasty seems to be working. Need to do more gastrocs but right foot, compliance, balance etc...easier to not do and wear a surgical shoe vs bootSurprising to hear that you’re not having great results with a Keller. Literature shows good results and I’ve had the same. I love Kellers.
Lol. Nice voice text autocorrect. That would be Keller's
So yeah, I mean, we could maybe even use a 20ga to do an Achilles tendonotomy or TAL with 100 passes
View attachment 370035
I like the beaver blade method. I dont know the # but one has a curved edge and would probably be better.Don't disagree that all of these things CAN be done with an 18 Ga needle, but personally have never understood why people have wanted to screw around with doing tenotomies with them.
Save yourself some time and buy a pack of #6200 beaver blades. Same, if not smaller incision.
Also, from a practice standpoint, the times I have done a FT with a needle I couldn't help but feel it looked quite silly and wondered what I would think as a patient being billed for a "surgical procedure" as this dude roots around in my toe with a inch and a half needle..
I wanted to react with an emoji but I can't pick which one. Instead, here's a youtube clip that comes to mind:This thread reminded me something that happened at Kaiser SF.
One nonsurgical wound care doc dropped dead one day. So bunch of the chronic ulcer patients flooded into other DPMs' schedules. And of course over there some of the big boys of ACFAS were/are working at the time. There was no way Schuberth would debride ulcers in clinic. No freaking way.
So here was what happened: the DPMs there basically worked nights and weekends and amp'd everyone. TMAs at a minimum, BKAs went to Ortho/Vascular.
The results were actually good that this essentially eliminated the demand for a replacement nonsurgical wound care DPM.
Not sure how it is now over there but I always reflect back on this. Demand for wound care can be artificially created or eliminated.
BrutalThis thread reminded me something that happened at Kaiser SF.
One nonsurgical wound care doc dropped dead one day. So bunch of the chronic ulcer patients flooded into other DPMs' schedules. And of course over there some of the big boys of ACFAS were/are working at the time. There was no way Schuberth would debride ulcers in clinic. No freaking way.
So here was what happened: the DPMs there basically worked nights and weekends and amp'd everyone. TMAs at a minimum, BKAs went to Ortho/Vascular.
The results were actually good that this essentially eliminated the demand for a replacement nonsurgical wound care DPM.
Not sure how it is now over there but I always reflect back on this. Demand for wound care can be artificially created or eliminated.
I wanted to react with an emoji but I can't pick which one. Instead, here's a youtube clip that comes to mind:
But, “in my hands”....😉Feli is correct. Could is different than should.
A circumcision could be done with an 18 gauge needle……but …..,,
Yeah... it's the normal PF code that I listed on the previous page. That's the whole idea of build EBM for it, doing it, saying it works well, etc: to get paid (then probably get paid again for Keller and/or open PF later also).So what CPT is being used for the first mpj plantar fascia release? The same as for medial band at central heel?
STJ + TN instead of classic triple
I'm not saying medial approach double - or triple - arthrodesis doesn't work (esp for valgus hindfoot), but the 28715 (triple) pays 28.2 rvu and the TN + STJ (28740 + 28725) pays 24.7 + 23.3... so so 36.4 rvu with the smaller code 50%. That's a difference of 8rvu aka approx $400. With work rvu, I think the % increase is even higher.Yeah Feli didn’t take his meds again. Some of those examples (ie spot weld, deep bone biopsies) are billing/coding shenanigans but others have legitimate EBM or sound biomechanical theory behind them.
It's not as if triple suddenly stopped working, but people coincidentally got interested in and started lecturing and publishing on something similar that pays significantly more.