Can you elaborate on why you are supporting this new school?
I have to admit that being on this forum I have been learning a lot of things that aren't being taught in my school. ie. I wasn't aware that too many optometrists was an issue. I've been asking around a lot for better understanding so I can learn it better.
As for this new school; I guess my main argument is that the current status of eye care in the US is not good enough right now. I didn't know why I couldn't play sports well (basketball never hit the hoop, baseball never hit the ball) until I came to optometry school. Frankly I'm not sure I would have learned if I hadn't come to PUCO since most schools don't deal with VT.
I can see the argument that schools are fighting to get more applicants to get money and more schools probably means less applicants per school. (I guess that % of revenue would be small anyway but gossip has said that's why opt. schools want more applicants.) For another thing more optometrists would mean more political power. Optometrists can go into research and other jobs rather than compete for patients. I feel optometrists are better refracters than any other profession; patients should be referred to us to get a good prescription. Would you place more value on an Rx by an unfamiliar optometrist or ophthalmalogist? (just curious actually, not meant to prove a point or anything.) I think that a new school would broaden the prespective of the practice. California could sure use some help in broadening the practice (that's why I don't plan on practicing there even though I grew up there.)
I also think more optometrists would force more cohesion within the practice. If competition is high, you got to be good to keep your practice going.
So this is where my train of thoughts are going but as I said I am still new to this concept and with all this discussion my understanding is certainly growing.