- Joined
- Aug 17, 2012
- Messages
- 2,283
- Reaction score
- 2,920
- Points
- 5,771
Was this patient prophylaxed with monoclonal antibody valsava-maB?
Ok, Its 515 pm on a friday and you are moonlighting at an urgent care center. A 33 yof comes in complaing of left eye pain and bluriness......Send to urgent care, go home.
Ok, Its 515 pm on a friday and you are moonlighting at an urgent care center. A 33 yof comes in complaing of left eye pain and bluriness......
My first thought was corneal abrasion. That buys a looksee with the Woods lamp.
Is she having any trouble voiding or any other findings on PE?
Whats concerning here is not the pain but the blurred vision... a corneal abrasion does not cause blurred vision
The corneal abrasions we see "as anesthesiologists" tend to be linear, small and do not cause blurry vision.Sure it can, depending on size and location
The corneal abrasions we see "as anesthesiologists" tend to be linear, small and do not cause blurry vision.
I am sure you can have a giant laceration of the cornea interfering with vision, but not in our practice my friend.
5 pm on friday you finish your last EGD on a 33 yof with epigastric pain. Propofol wears off. She complains of pain and blurriness in her left eye. Nothing abnormal on gross exam. Everybody including yourself is anxious to go home. Plan?
I thought valsalva retinopathy was painless...?
What other 500 drugs did you use for the case?5 pm on friday you finish your last EGD on a 33 yof with epigastric pain. Propofol wears off. She complains of pain and blurriness in her left eye. Nothing abnormal on gross exam. Everybody including yourself is anxious to go home. Plan?
No other drugs. Just propofol and lido. No contacts. No migraines or glaucoma. Pain feels superficial, bluriness is more due to tear production than actual vision change.What other 500 drugs did you use for the is nase?
Any history of glaucoma?
Any history of migranes?
Can she describe the pain? Deep inside the eye or superficial?
Corneal abrasion is usually the culprit. I wouldn't go home before figuring it out.
No other drugs. Just propofol and lido. No contacts. No migraines or glaucoma. Pain feels superficial, bluriness is more due to tear production than actual vision change.
This was my approach. Symptoms resolved by the next day. Data says patching not needed. Data on abx is limited. Optho consult was offered friday night but pt declined.urgest: 15141700 said:I'm fairly comfortable that it is a corneal abrasion. It would be nice to look with a woods lamp but I doubt many places have it. I would send home with erythro ointment and follow up the next day by phone.
Here is the deal:Question, as I get ready to start CA1 here soon (not soon enough), do some really send these to the ED for evaluation? I would think (assuming equipment is available) it would be our responsibility to evaluate and initiate basic treatment for a not infrequent complication.
Isn't that just half of the problem? Fundoscopy still has to be performed.Often times you hear on this site that anesthesiologists are better than crnas because they don't know medicine and it leads to more consultations and delays. Then you hear stuff like above.
Perhaps the learning point of the story is that people in amb surg centers should have an ophthalmoscope available.
You cannot look inside the eye with an ophthalmoscope?Isn't that just half of the problem? Fundoscopy still has to be performed.
How many people did you graduate with that "can do" fundoscopy but can't reliably visualize the fundus or make decisions based on what they saw? I can visualize it, but obviously don't have the knowledge base and judgment to make those decisions as related to anesthesiology. But I can only visualize because I was terrible at it, and I was fortunate to have met a pediatrician who took it upon herself to teach me, and let me use her slow clinic days to practice whether the patient had an eye related concern or not.You cannot look inside the eye with an ophthalmoscope?
Should we send you back to med school?How many people did you graduate with that "can do" fundoscopy but can't reliably visualize the fundus or make decisions based on what they saw? I can visualize it, but obviously don't have the knowledge base and judgment to make those decisions as related to anesthesiology. But I can only visualize because I was terrible at it, and I was fortunate to have met a pediatrician who took it upon herself to teach me, and let me use her slow clinic days to practice whether the patient had an eye related concern or not.
Why? I can perform fundoscopy? I don't know all of the potential anesthesia related diseases, so I wouldn't necessarily know all of the things I should be looking for. That's why I'm doing a residency.Should we send you back to med school?
But ask yourself, how many anesthesiology residents use an ophthalmoscope regularly?
Do you know how mad I would be if I were your patient? First you scratch my cornea. Then you are incompetent to deal with it and send me to waste time and money in some ER where they are going to do what you could have done if you knew what you were doing.
![]()
Dude, I've been lugging this thing around for a while now. I'm dying to pull it out. It's right next to the retrograde wire kit and tuning forks.
Well, don't come here and claim that you are better than crnas, because that's what a independent crna would do. Send them to the ER.
5 pm on friday you finish your last EGD on a 33 yof with epigastric pain. Propofol wears off. She complains of pain and blurriness in her left eye. Nothing abnormal on gross exam. Everybody including yourself is anxious to go home. Plan?
Horses before zebras. Someone was waving a scope around her face, probably while daydreaming about a new set of titanium golf clubs. Corneal abrasions cause pain and a foreign body sensation, which causes tears, which causes blurry vision. If I could get the patient to blink herself back to normal visual acuity, the pain went away with a drop of tetracaine, and a fluorescein exam showed an abrasion, by all means, I'd squirt some erythromycin goo in there, reassure her, send her home, and call her in the morning. If I think she needs a fundoscopic exam then it's going to be done by someone besides me.
I can only comment from a surgical perspective at this point 🙁That sounds more reasonable.
Question for residents: how are training programs teaching you to deal with this? Call ophtha? Deal with it? Do eye exam? I'm sure your dept has a policy.
In other words, am I a cowboy or are these guy a bunch of wusses?
I can only comment from a surgical perspective at this point 🙁
Same here. Actually why I posed the question. It is surprising to me the comments about Wood's lamp isn't always available, I wouldn't think this is hard to find piece of equipment to keep around, its just a black light. Thankfully I had to use one relatively frequently on Trauma, since we evaluated eye complaints before contacting Optho.
Really?Often times you hear on this site that anesthesiologists are better than crnas because they don't know medicine and it leads to more consultations and delays. Then you hear stuff like above.
Perhaps the learning point of the story is that people in amb surg centers should have an ophthalmoscope available.
Big mouth. 😀I actually think the problem in anesthesia is not only CRNAs but it's also people who have their heads in the sand and hiding in academia like yourself.