Server Updates We will be completing server updates between 3:00 - 6:00 AM Eastern on Wednesday, March 23. Thanks for your patience while we improve SDN!
You know, I do both still. It depends on the pt, the PIP, the surgeon, the sats, etc. If someone can show me were one is better for all, then I'll change.
You know, I do both still. It depends on the pt, the PIP, the surgeon, the sats, etc. If someone can show me were one is better for all, then I'll change.
Yes, each case is different.
Most of the times I just decrease the TV slightly and increase the rate a little and see what happens to the PIP, and SPO2.
For lung transplants, the surgeon and pumonologist really insist on it. I don't know if there is transplant data or they are just extrapolating ARDS data.
For the run of the mill 1-3hr thoracic case there might not be any difference, or at least very hard to show on clinical trial. I use the lowest volume my ETCo2 allows.
I would go with low TV in pneumonectomies...just because the risk of ARDS (or post-pneumonectomy pulmonary edema for the old schools folks) is relatively high.
yeah, you're right. assuming there's no other obstruction downstream from it, the point of maximum obstruction is the elbow joint at the tip of the tube. that's what the ventilator is measuring as the "peak" pressure when the bellows/pistons starts-a-pushin'. of course, in your scenario the mean airway pressure would also be way outta whack.