- Joined
- Aug 12, 2017
- Messages
- 147
- Reaction score
- 237
As I've been studying recently, I've found conflicting information on the optimal treatment of anxiety related disorders in the literature. Few articles compare medications to therapy, particularly in recent years, but the two articles that most directly addressed this question had opposing data. Both articles use Hedge's g to measure effect sizes.
1 meta-analysis ("Psychological and pharmacological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" by Carl E, et all) has therapy being superior to medications. While another "Efficacy of treatments for anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis" by Borwin Bandelow, et all) has medications being superior to therapy, by a wider margin than the previous study. Both articles came out in the last 4 years with the former being published this year. The latter has been cited much more and is in a slightly higher impact journal.
What are your thoughts about these articles? Is the truth likely the common teaching that both treatments are equivocal?
1 meta-analysis ("Psychological and pharmacological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" by Carl E, et all) has therapy being superior to medications. While another "Efficacy of treatments for anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis" by Borwin Bandelow, et all) has medications being superior to therapy, by a wider margin than the previous study. Both articles came out in the last 4 years with the former being published this year. The latter has been cited much more and is in a slightly higher impact journal.
What are your thoughts about these articles? Is the truth likely the common teaching that both treatments are equivocal?