over-saturation

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

edieb

Senior Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
77
Has anybody seen this article?? This is wild... It talks about the National Association of Professional Providers of Psychology training M.A.-level clinicians as psychologists under a new expedited 18-month degree and then getting them licensed as psychologists using loopholes in psychologist licensing rules.. These providers will then be working as health psychologists in hospitals.... What does everyone think about this?

Here is the excerpt:
A program was launched at Arizona State University recently that admitted 57 students embarking on a new degree, the doctor of behavioral health (DBH). All of the new students are practicing M.A. level psychotherapists with an average of more than seven years of experience. They will be taking classes and work year round with the expectation of completing the program including internship hours within 18 months.
"Psychology should continue to be the science for the psychological professions," he said, "but the new degree is freed from the plethora of irrelevant requirements that APA imposes on the Ph.D. and even the Psy. D." He expects that the DBH will be an integral part of the health system, serving as primary behavioral care providers who work in partnership with primary care physicians.
John Caccavale, Ph.D., executive director of NAPPP, said students from the DBH program will be eligible for licensure as psychologists in at least 26 states because of psychology equivalency provisions in the laws of those states. He predicts the DBH program will provide competition for the professional schools of psychology that are currently accredited by APA and are experiencing declining enrollment. The DBH program at Arizona State is accredited by the National Institute for Behavioral Health Quality.
Having been mentored by full-time academic faculty who earn salaries and typically have little background in business, Cummings said new practitioners are often economic illiterates who are determined to do good for society but who have limited realization of the economic reality that practice is a business with steep overhead costs on top of student loans to pay back.


http://nationalpsychologist.com/articles/art_v18n6_1.htm
 
Even MORE people flooding the market....wow. I really had hopes the NAPPP would help push the APA to be more progressive, but now they are just coming off as much more of a fringe organization. What current psychologist thinks this is a good idea?
 
Even MORE people flooding the market....wow. I really had hopes the NAPPP would help push the APA to be more progressive, but now they are just coming off as much more of a fringe organization. What current psychologist thinks this is a good idea?

Ironically, Cummings himself was the one that started professional programs AND managed behavioral health care - making himself incredibly wealthy in the process. I'm not surprised to see him behind another movement that further exploits the field for his benefit.
 
I am glad I am not a health or neuropsychologist because my supervisor, who attended the conference cited in the article, said these M.A. to be Ph.D. folks are all being trained in these areas.

I wonder what loopholes they are going to get licensed through??? I can't imagine the psychologists who sit on those licensing boards are going to allow this backdoor policy
 
I am glad I am not a health or neuropsychologist because my supervisor, who attended the conference cited in the article, said these M.A. to be Ph.D. folks are all being trained in these areas.

I wonder what loopholes they are going to get licensed through??? I can't imagine the psychologists who sit on those licensing boards are going to allow this backdoor policy

There are still a handful of MA/MS level "psychologists" out there from 30+ years ago that were grandfathered in, not to mention applicants from fly-by-night programs that still apply for licensure. Sadly we can't even protect our own profession, let along all of the people encroaching on our field.
 
I just cannot understand why the APA leadership of the past 15 years has not done a better job of seriously addressing these trends. Now we have this, the budgets being slashed for neuropsychology across the board, and a growing trend of professionals who do not even think psychologists should use the professional designation of "Dr."

The leadership should knock off the conference booze binging and clique-ish backscratching and enact policies with real teeth..
 
Top