Overdiagnosis of Depression

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

UNMC2006

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2003
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
Me again, with another interesting question. As I begin to take H&Ps, I can't help but notice the abundance of patients that are diagnosed and being treating for depression. I am not in the clinic daily, but once every two weeks at least, and see about 15 patients a day. I would say that at least 40-50% have previous diagnoses of depression charted. Interestingly enough, my preceptor seems to love bipolar as well. Knowing something about this coming from a psyc background, I would hesitate to diagnose some of these patients with depression, and many of the bipolar individuals don't seem to meet the criteria. Is there a problem with overdiagnosis in the medical field with regard to this pathology, or not?
 
I think that SSRI's are the most common drug prescribed by primary care physicians (I don't have any proof of this but just have heard/read that a few times). SSRI's seem to work well (although how much may be placebo effect is interesting to research) and there are few major side effects and so the primary care doc's like to give it out whenever there is a hint of possible depression. These drugs are also heavily advertised direct-to-consumer with the symptoms given out in the ads...it's really easy for people to go in and say 'I have trouble sleeping, poor apetite, etc., etc.'. The doc can't write the prescription without a diagnosis, so the diagnosis is made -- it's not like you can do a lab test or something to confirm. Also, sending them for a psych consult to truly confirm the diagnosis is too expensive, so they just write the script and see if things improve. It seems to make people happy (figuratively and literally) to be diagnosed with depression.
 
actually, SSRI's are used for a number of problems aside from depression, so this may be one factor.

as for diagnosing depression, I'm sure you are aware of the very specific criteria delineated in the DSM-IV.

finally, remember that the hospitalized population is very different from the population at large. you will come to realize (if you haven't already) that sick people get sick...and this includes large numbers of people with depression, diabetes, hypertension,... in far excess to proportion within the population-at-large.
 
I agree mpp, SSRIs are a good 1st line class of drugs with very little risk, and insurance companies require the diagnosis. In that respect, I can see the prevalance of the depression diagnosis. Any idea with regards to bipolar???

Good point with the sick get sicker analogy. I was referring to patients who were not recently hospitalized, as this is an FP doc. I have however seen a great deal of this phenomenon in cardiology rotations.
 
Originally posted by UNMC2006
I agree mpp, SSRIs are a good 1st line class of drugs with very little risk, and insurance companies require the diagnosis. In that respect, I can see the prevalance of the depression diagnosis. Any idea with regards to bipolar???

Good point with the sick get sicker analogy. I was referring to patients who were not recently hospitalized, as this is an FP doc. I have however seen a great deal of this phenomenon in cardiology rotations.

Even for an FP doc, what I said still holds. After all, how often do healthy people go to the doctors? Aside from young children, the answer is very rarely. You just don't see healthy young adults going to the doctor's office with any degree of regularity.

As far as bipolar, I have no idea. I hope these patients are being seen by a qualified psychiatrist; frankly I don't think a typical FP doc is properly trained to deal with serious psychiatric disease.
 
The reality is that depression has been extremely underdiagnosed in this country because of the social stigma associated with mental illness. Over the last few years the "chemical imbalance" model has allowed depression at least to be seen on the level of most other "medical" or chronic diseases. There is much less stigma on depression as an illness today, as there was even 10 years ago. The Prozac revolution opened up a whole new world of treatment for many people. And now "big name" people are coming forward to just lend more support that this is a disease that needs treatment. Just today, Terry Bradshaw and Ricky Watters, big names in American football came out on a tv show and spoke how they both have major depression and are undergoing treatment and doing well. That's HUGE!

Most depressed patients don't really meet all the DSM criteria, and no good psychiatrist in practice will hold strictly to DSM criteria because each patient is an individual and the presentation of the disease varies by age, and even ethnicity. This goes for depression, bipolar, et al diagnoses. After practicing for a while you sort of just get "a flavor" for a patient...you don't need to use that checklist.

The Federal Government which determines Medicare physician payment rates does not feel mental illness is worthy of considering mental illness on par with other diseases. In fact, according to Medicare guidelines, Medicare will reimburse a psychiatrist 80% of a normal visit for a mental illness code. Medicare will also reimburse any other physician 60% of that 80% if they put down a psych diagnosis code. Do the math and you will see that means a FP or internist, or pediatrician will get paid 50% of what they normally do for treating depression.

that being said, there are simply not enough mental health professionals to take care of all the patients with mental health needs. You just can't get psych consults, because there may not be a psychiatrist for 50 miles! Family Practitioners, Primary Care Internists and other primary care specialists are treating more patients with depression than psychiatrists! In fact, primary care providers are providing the bulk of the psychiatric care in this country.

I have to disagree with md_student10021 (btw: r u @ cornell? i was in the class of 2000 🙂 ) FPs are WELL TRAINED in managing most "primary care" psychiatric disorders, including depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder et al. I am completing residency in less than 2 months and I am extremely comfortable with psychotropic medications, as well as providing supportive psychotherapy, family therapy and couples counseling. I have made appropriate referrals for psychiatric admissions, and have had 0 adverse outcomes (i.e. suicide attempts/completions or untreated mania). I treat many depressed, anxious and bipolar patients without the assistance of a psychiatrist, and I usually initiate meds on some of the "really sick patients' that I do send to the psychiatrist, and they usually send the patient right back to me and sign off on the case with no changes because I have the "right" psychopharm for this patient.

I would guesstimate that in my panel of patients (almost 1000 in 3 yrs of residency), about 30-40% have a psychiatric comorbidity, and a lot of them are depressed. I've probably even missed a few.
 
Top