p53 question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Creflo

time to eat
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
498
Reaction score
392
I'm doing a presentation on porokeratosis, and an article states that p53 is overexpressed, and this leads to higher chance of transformation into malignancy. I trust that the article is accurate, but I don't understand how overexpression of a tumor suppressor can lead to transformation. I thought it would be underexpression. Can someone help explain?
 
You're right...doesn't make sense...unless some other sort of homeostatic mechanism comes into play without hinderance?...but that also wouldn't make sense...
 
This is from the online Wikepedia:

p53 (also known as protein 53 or tumor protein 53), is a transcription factor which in humans is encoded by the TP53 gene.[1][2][3] p53 is important in multicellular organisms, where it regulates the cell cycle and thus functions as a tumor suppressor that is involved in preventing cancer. As such, p53 has been described as "the guardian of the genome," "the guardian angel gene," and the "master watchman," referring to its role in conserving stability by preventing genome mutation.[4]
The name p53 is in reference to its apparent molecular mass: it runs as a 53 kilodalton (kDa) protein on SDS-PAGE. But based on calculations from its amino acid residues, p53's mass is actually only 43.7kDa. This difference is due to the high number of proline residues in the protein which slow its migration on SDS-PAGE, thus making it appear heavier than it actually is.[5] This effect is observed with p53 from a variety of species, including humans, rodents, frogs, and fish.


Mutations that deactivate p53 in cancer usually occur in the DBD. Most of these mutations destroy the ability of the protein to bind to its target DNA sequences, and thus prevents transcriptional activation of these genes. As such, mutations in the DBD are recessive loss-of-function mutations. Molecules of p53 with mutations in the OD dimerise with wild-type p53, and prevent them from activating transcription. Therefore OD mutations have a dominant negative effect on the function of p53.

It would seem that overexpression of a mutant form of p53, 2nd paragraph above, could play a role. You'd want to double check this, but this would make logical sense. The references above are from Wikepedia, just google p53 expression tumor and click on the wikepedia site.
 
I'm doing a presentation on porokeratosis, and an article states that p53 is overexpressed, and this leads to higher chance of transformation into malignancy. I trust that the article is accurate, but I don't understand how overexpression of a tumor suppressor can lead to transformation. I thought it would be underexpression. Can someone help explain?

Keep in mind the two functions of P53. In plain language, what p53 does is to temporarily halt the cell cycle so that repair to DNA can be completed... BUT, if the damage is too great it activates the BAX apoptosis gene and kills the cell. In a way P53 is really both a life and death gene.
 
Top