• Set Yourself Up For Success Webinar

    October 6, 2021 at 2 PM Eastern/11 AM Pacific
    SDN and Osmosis are teaming up to help you get set up for success this school year! We'll be covering study tips, healthy habits, and meeting mentors.

    Register Now!

  • Site Updates Coming Soon

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!

    LEARN MORE

Part 2 Decks Corrections

toothmail

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Aug 5, 2003
583
0
0
has anyone checked out the corrections posted on the flashcard company website for part 2 2001 edition decks? does it seem like some more cards have mistakes that havent been addressed on the site?

eg: the oral path deck on enamel hypoplasia and hypocalcification- the causes seem to be interchanged.

please do share with all of us if u come across any more decks with blatant mistakes so we can all learn something that makes sense.

thanks.
 
Upvote 0

toothlord

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Dec 4, 2003
346
0
0
toothmail here it is:

1.go to the hypoglycemic drugs in the pharmacology section.
insulin injections:the third one is intermediate acting not immediate acting(nph and lente).
2.go to the adrenergic drugs section.
for asthma i think there was (albuterol and metoprolol and terbutaline )those are selective b2 agonist instead of b1 agonist.

forgime me if its not clear because i dident download the corrections,i just remember them very well.
 
Upvote 0

toothmail

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Aug 5, 2003
583
0
0
i have a doubt regarding the part 2 decks:

in ortho decks, one deck talks about SNA and SNB angles.

SNA angle is 82+ or - 2 which is correct in the decks.

its says an SNB angle of 80 is normal. as far as i know in the Steiner analysis an SNB angle of 78 is considered normal + or - 2. but decks say 80. any explanations? do we learn it as 78 or 80?
 
Upvote 0
About the Ads
About the Ads
This thread is more than 17 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.