PAT analysis

[jdent]

---

Members do not see this ad.

HEy peolple of the world look at these scores from 2 practice PATs
the first column is top score and the second column is Crack DAt Pat. Now I didnt like the achievers angles but everything else was better. I saw some of kaplans but kaplans are really easy in all six sections. I just took CDP and it was really really hard. Like they have some crazy folds by the whole punching, their angels are within 3 degrees of each other, and their shapes for keyholes and TFE are hard. But, I still think that it CDP was awesome practice. If you can do it you can prob do the DAT from what peole are saying on SDN.

Key holes-13,13
TFE-12,13
Angles-12,10
Hole-15,12
Cube-14,12
pattern-14,11

overall 22 on top score and 20 on CDP

good luck to all
I just wanted to give my opinion on the PAT sections.

 

[DRHOYA]

If you can do CDP, then you can do the real DAT. On the real one, from my experience, Key's were a little easier, TFE a little harder, angles were harder (these are no joke....but also i've never liked angles), hole punching was easier, CC was way easier, and pattern folding was similar (more shapes than shading). Hope that helps.

 

[sang86]

folding is quite different tho.