- Joined
- Nov 26, 2013
- Messages
- 1,352
- Reaction score
- 193
So I get that when testing patella reflex, you are basically testing a patient's L2, L3, L4 sensory and afferent reflex. But unlike other reflex such as Moro reflex (infant response to sudden loss of support when the infant feels as if it is falling), which I think is linked to an evolutionary process of human, I feel like there is no point of having patella reflex.
Also, is patella reflex really useful in clinic? Let's say the patient does not show any reflex or less reflex, it just means that the patient's sensory or LMN (or both) not working well, right?
Wiki says that abnormal patella reflex may indicate cerebellum damage, how come?
Lastly, this is probably not important for the board exam, but I just seem to have a problem accepting that a blow to the patella tendon stimulates muscle spindle in the leg extensor muscles such as quadriceps. I mean why can't you do the same by stimulating the other parts or let's say the leg extensor muscle itself?
I would really appreciate any help.
Many thanks in advance.
Also, is patella reflex really useful in clinic? Let's say the patient does not show any reflex or less reflex, it just means that the patient's sensory or LMN (or both) not working well, right?
Wiki says that abnormal patella reflex may indicate cerebellum damage, how come?
Lastly, this is probably not important for the board exam, but I just seem to have a problem accepting that a blow to the patella tendon stimulates muscle spindle in the leg extensor muscles such as quadriceps. I mean why can't you do the same by stimulating the other parts or let's say the leg extensor muscle itself?
I would really appreciate any help.
Many thanks in advance.