Sophialovescupcake
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2022
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
Is there any reliable resource to see the pathology residency program ranking? Or how could we tell a program is a malignant or not? Thank you!
Is there any reliable resource to see the pathology residency program ranking? Or how could we tell a program is a malignant or not? Thank you!
I've done residency and fellowship(s) at two kinds of places. In residencies with many fellowships and very high volume (large academic medical centers), fellows on subspecialty sign out services tend to gobble up the surgical cases. This may not lead to optimal resident training. In programs with few (or no) fellowships and medium volume, the residents can handle and read out most of the cases in general sign out. Grossing and autopsies are also lighter. Just my opinion. More volume/fellowships isn't always better for resident training.There’s no ranking. Just go to the best university based hospital with many fellowships you can match into and that you’d be happy at. Many fellowships means there’s adequate volume to support a fellowship. So more fellowships = more volume = more expertise = better training.
The more experts at your program the better.
Thank you! I feel like there are always ups and downs for some programs. Is there any hardcore critical to look at the program's quality?Do some digging on this forum. There are many previous threads on weak programs.
This is weird. Why couldn’t you sit in on those signouts? i get the fellow-driven model taking cases in a clinical residency like surgery but doesn’t make sense for pathology. You also can look at the cases after they are signed out. Sounds like you trained at a bad place. I went to a high-volume place with tons of fellowships and saw more than I could have ever cared to see. I was welcome to go to any signout I wanted as long as I covered my responsibilities. Also had my foot in the door for any fellowship I wanted.I've done residency and fellowship(s) at two kinds of places. In residencies with many fellowships and very high volume (large academic medical centers), fellows on subspecialty sign out services tend to gobble up the surgical cases. This may not lead to optimal resident training. In programs with few (or no) fellowships and medium volume, the residents can handle and read out most of the cases in general sign out. Grossing and autopsies are also lighter. Just my opinion. More volume/fellowships isn't always better for resident training.
I see that Henry Ford Hospital has over 180,000 surgical specimens, they have no in-house fellowship except LGG and informatics. What do you think about this case?There’s no ranking. Just go to the best university based hospital with many fellowships you can match into and that you’d be happy at. Many fellowships means there’s adequate volume to support a fellowship. So more fellowships = more volume = more expertise = better training.
The more experts at your program the better.