Has anyone used this book? If so, some feedback would be appreciated. Also do you think there is that much difference between the third edition (2000) and the fourth edition (2003)? Thanks.
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Step I Pathophys For The Boards and Wards
Started by DMBmatty08
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
I used it along with Rapid Review and BRS. While this is probably overkill, you get synergy (BRS for strictly pathology, RR for integration, Boards & Wards for clinical pearls).DMBmatty08 said:Has anyone used this book? If so, some feedback would be appreciated. Also do you think there is that much difference between the third edition (2000) and the fourth edition (2003)? Thanks.
Why would you want to use a book that is pushing 7 years old for such an important class?
I have the third edition and I've compared it to the 4th.
Besides the questions, random sections that I chose to compare were exactly the same, word for word. I didn't compare everything, but I chose several excerpts and the only difference I found was the use of a full term in the 4th where there was only an acronym in the third.
Besides the questions, random sections that I chose to compare were exactly the same, word for word. I didn't compare everything, but I chose several excerpts and the only difference I found was the use of a full term in the 4th where there was only an acronym in the third.
BlackNDecker said:I used it along with Rapid Review and BRS. While this is probably overkill, you get synergy (BRS for strictly pathology, RR for integration, Boards & Wards for clinical pearls).
Why would you want to use a book that is pushing 7 years old for such an important class?
I have the third edition and I've compared it to the 4th.
Besides the questions, random sections that I chose to compare were exactly the same, word for word. I didn't compare everything, but I chose several excerpts and the only difference I found was the use of a full term in the 4th where there was only an acronym in the third.
This is why I asked, if there is no real difference, then I can get the older version much cheaper (41 cents +shipping) than buying the new book for $36.
If you're not pressed for time, you can get the old one and if you're not satisfied with a section, search the book on amazon.com.
They've scanned in the book so you can search for a term and find the equivalent in the new edition. (That's how I made my comparison)
They've scanned in the book so you can search for a term and find the equivalent in the new edition. (That's how I made my comparison)