Patient question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

bedrock

Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Messages
8,063
Reaction score
5,849
I have a patient from a rural area with bad knees in early 50s. Failed one knee replacement, OA in other. Insurance doesn’t cover genicular RFA so I did hers for cash. She came with a driver last time and I had her take a Xanax and a Norco which helped her tolerate her bilateral genicular RFA.

She comes from a rural area 4 hrs away. This time she wants to drive herself, skip the pills, and drive herself home the same day. 10hr project.

She is asking if I think it’s ok to drive home 4 hrs after this procedure.

She is a normal person, not flaky. I guess I just worry about liability if she gets in an accident on the way home at the end of this 10 hr project?
 
No motor involvement and theoretically with the nerves numbed her knees will work better than they did on the way over. I think it’s fine without the sedating pills. Just as you can drive after shots into both knees.
 
I would allow her to drive. If it is her left knee you are treating this time how could it possibly interfere with driving?
 
He said bilateral genicular
 
shared decision making.

discuss risks of driving after procedure and potential pain with procedure might affect her ability to drive. document, and let her make decision to drive or stay overnight at a local hotel.

then tell her to get a vehicle with self drive technology.
 
Yes. And no.
Odd coming from the guy who’s ready to fry anyone in court for going against the standard of care.

I agree that most can probably drive safely themselves, especially when anesthetic is left out however, what happens when they get in a wreck and kill themselves and someone else. You really want to be brought into that lawsuit?
 
Last edited:
Odd coming from the guy who’s ready to fry anyone in court for going against the standard of care.

I agree that most can probably drive safely themselves, especially when anesthetic is left out however, what happens when they get in a wreck and kill themselves and someone else. You really want any brought into that lawsuit
No local. No restrictions. How about mohs surgery? No driver. Flu shot? Knee injection.
 
I have let some lumbar MBB, RFA, and ESI (without local anesthetic in the shot) drive themselves. Only select patients I trust, and only after the examine them post procedure.

For most people, having a driver for a procedure is not a big burden. I’m not willing to risk a lawsuit from an MVC after letting someone drive home.
 
my concern is also some lawyer convincing a bunch of uneducated jurors that an injection caused a patient's inability to step on the brake pedal hard enough and injure or kill someone.
 
has anyone ever had a patient get into an accident after a procedure?

with all of our combined experience? ive never heard of it
 
has anyone ever had a patient get into an accident after a procedure?

with all of our combined experience? ive never heard of it

Who cares. Standard of care. Industry recs. Stim trials, regardless if it’s parasthesia or 10k, do not drive home.
 
Who cares. Standard of care. Industry recs. Stim trials, regardless if it’s parasthesia or 10k, do not drive home.
i generally make patients have a ride, but where is it SOC? where is it written that it is an industry rec?

for stim trials or if there is conscious sedation, then of course they need a driver
 
i generally make patients have a ride, but where is it SOC? where is it written that it is an industry rec?

for stim trials or if there is conscious sedation, then of course they need a driver

I’m talking specifically for scs trials. Were in agreement here.
 
Top