pcat

Started by sekom
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

sekom

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
My Pcat is on Saturday , I am bit nervous, but i have a question about the essays. What i don't understand is how we give a solution to a problem and point out the weakness in it and then make a resolution?
if for example the topic is about obesity: is it true if i say it can be reduced by exercising
then i say but not all people have the ability to exercise then i make a solution by saying for example doctors will give this person a list of activities he can do inorder to move a bit and be active?
does that make sense?
thanks in advance
 
Actually you suggest a solution to the problem, then offer alternative solutions. You then say why the alternative solutions are not as good as your original solution.

Using your example, if your argument is that people should lose weight by exercise. You could then say an alternative is surgery, but surgery is not as good as exercise because of health risks or people not learning proper diet. Something to that effect.