- Joined
- Feb 7, 2007
- Messages
- 27
- Reaction score
- 2
I have always wanted to do pediatrics, and I fell for peds emergency in med school. I decided to do a pediatrics residency (rather than an emergency residency), and then a fellowship, for a couple of reasons: I wanted a strong pediatrics background going into fellowship, and I wanted general peds as my backup plan in case I ever burn out of emergency medicine (as many EM doctors do).
I was talking to my advisor this morning about my life goals and whatnot, and she suggested that I should consider the option of doing a second residency in EM instead of a fellowship in PEM. The advantages, as she stated, are the following: same time commitment (3 years), more pay after training, greater job market versatility (because many areas don't have the volume to support an EM doc who ONLY sees kids, but those areas are REALLY looking for an EM doc with peds experience). The disadvantages she listed: less training in academics/research, longer hours during a second residency, and less pay during the second residency.
So, there is a faculty member in my program who went this route and is now triple-board certified in Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Pediatrics, and Emergency Medicine. However, I read the eligibility requirements on the ABP and ABEM websites, and apparently, only those who completed their training in EM and Peds prior to 1999 are eligible to sit for the subspecialty boards; everyone else has to do a fellowship.
So the question is, is it better to be certified in Peds EM, but be unable to see adults, and thus be limited in the areas I can find employment? Or is it better to be certified in pediatrics AND EM, but not in the subspecialty, and thus keep my peds options open but possibly limit myself if children's hospitals start requiring doctors board certified in PEM?
Does anyone else have a take on this?
I was talking to my advisor this morning about my life goals and whatnot, and she suggested that I should consider the option of doing a second residency in EM instead of a fellowship in PEM. The advantages, as she stated, are the following: same time commitment (3 years), more pay after training, greater job market versatility (because many areas don't have the volume to support an EM doc who ONLY sees kids, but those areas are REALLY looking for an EM doc with peds experience). The disadvantages she listed: less training in academics/research, longer hours during a second residency, and less pay during the second residency.
So, there is a faculty member in my program who went this route and is now triple-board certified in Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Pediatrics, and Emergency Medicine. However, I read the eligibility requirements on the ABP and ABEM websites, and apparently, only those who completed their training in EM and Peds prior to 1999 are eligible to sit for the subspecialty boards; everyone else has to do a fellowship.
So the question is, is it better to be certified in Peds EM, but be unable to see adults, and thus be limited in the areas I can find employment? Or is it better to be certified in pediatrics AND EM, but not in the subspecialty, and thus keep my peds options open but possibly limit myself if children's hospitals start requiring doctors board certified in PEM?
Does anyone else have a take on this?