S sanguinee Full Member 7+ Year Member Joined May 14, 2014 Messages 122 Reaction score 19 Jan 17, 2015 #1 Members don't see this ad. Can someone better explain why the velocity is not increasing if both KE and PE are increasing due to the increase in mass? Attachments Screen Shot 2015-01-17 at 12.07.05 PM.png 60.6 KB · Views: 62 Screen Shot 2015-01-17 at 1.29.40 PM.png 130.1 KB · Views: 55
Members don't see this ad. Can someone better explain why the velocity is not increasing if both KE and PE are increasing due to the increase in mass?
J jamcat Full Member 7+ Year Member Joined Nov 18, 2014 Messages 327 Reaction score 427 Jan 17, 2015 #2 If you look at it mathematically, it's because at that lowest point of maximum velocity, all of the potential energy (mgh) has been converted into kinetic energy (1/2 mv^2). So we have mgh=1/2 mv^2, and m cancels out of the equation. Does that help? Upvote 0 Downvote
If you look at it mathematically, it's because at that lowest point of maximum velocity, all of the potential energy (mgh) has been converted into kinetic energy (1/2 mv^2). So we have mgh=1/2 mv^2, and m cancels out of the equation. Does that help?
S sanguinee Full Member 7+ Year Member Joined May 14, 2014 Messages 122 Reaction score 19 Jan 17, 2015 #3 @jamcat ohh, and the velocity remains unchanged then. Makes sense. Thank you! Upvote 0 Downvote
J jamcat Full Member 7+ Year Member Joined Nov 18, 2014 Messages 327 Reaction score 427 Jan 17, 2015 #4 Yeah, m always cancels out, which is what TBR was saying when they explained that heavy objects fall at the same speed as light ones. Upvote 0 Downvote
Yeah, m always cancels out, which is what TBR was saying when they explained that heavy objects fall at the same speed as light ones.