- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
- Messages
- 85
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey guys I'm having trouble visualizing this but could someone explain why the bottom pendulum system has the greater change in PE? I thought it was the top one since its center of mass was higher..


Hey guys I'm having trouble visualizing this but could someone explain why the bottom pendulum system has the greater change in PE? I thought it was the top one since its center of mass was higher..
![]()
![]()
This can be verified if you consider the potential energy equation where PE = mgL (1 - cosine theta). If L increases, then PE increases, so the change in PE must change too.?
The bigger mass experiences the bigger change in height (larger magnitude of displacement from equilibrium position).
The L will be larger both before and after, which could be larger or smaller than the relative difference in PE for a "shorter" arm.
This is true (key words: larger magnitude of displacement).
Here's my conceptual model: With center of mass in mind, which pendulum will produce the most Kinetic Energy at the bottom of the swing? One in which the arm is longer or shorter? Well, since a pendulum merely cycles between Potential and Kinetic energy (like all Simple Harmonic Motion), a larger production of Kinetic Energy will reflect a larger change in Potential energy.
You are wrong here and should rethink your analysis.
Try redrawing the two pendulums with just one bob at the center of mass. You'll get two pendulums where one has a greater cable length than the other. The system with the greater cable length will experience a greater change in height from highest point to lowest point.
This can be verified if you consider the potential energy equation where PE = mgL (1 - cosine theta). If L increases, then PE increases, so the change in PE must change too.
Does the BR answer explanation show any pictures or is it just words for this one?