- Joined
- Dec 17, 2003
- Messages
- 5,886
- Reaction score
- 22
55 year old lady with no PMHx on no meds coming in for knee arthroscopy. She hurt her knee gardening.
Preop ecg.
Go or no go?
Preop ecg.
Go or no go?
proman said:Can't really see the EKG well but there might be a 1st degree AVB and peaked T waves. What's her potassium?
militarymd said:The ECG was read as NSR with LBBB.
My assessment of this patient is that she has one intermediate clinical predictor with ability to do more than 4 METS activity and undergoing low risk surgery......she went to the OR...got 200 mg of propofol and a size 4 LMA...with a referral to a cardiologist for followup and workup for her asymptomatic LBBB.
AJM said:Out of curiosity, do you guys not use the ACC guidelines for pre-op cardiac risk evaluation? Militarymd was the first person on this thread to mention them. As IM folks, we are consulted all the time for cardiac eval on cases like this, and all we have to do is just refer to the simple flowchart the ACC published.
I would have done exactly what militarymd did -- there is no need for further pre-op cardiac testing in this patient. If anything, militarymd might have been a little on the conservative side, giving the patient one intermediate clinical predictor. I take it that you are saying that she has had a prior MI based on the LBBB (which is what I would say, as well). Some physicians would have interpreted this simply as an abnormal EKG, and therefore given her only a minor clinical predictor. It wouldn't change the overall decision either way as this is a low risk procedure in a patient with good functional status.
AJM said:If anything, militarymd might have been a little on the conservative side, giving the patient one intermediate clinical predictor. I take it that you are saying that she has had a prior MI based on the LBBB (which is what I would say, as well). Some physicians would have interpreted this simply as an abnormal EKG, and therefore given her only a minor clinical predictor. It wouldn't change the overall decision either way as this is a low risk procedure in a patient with good functional status.
needadvice said:assuming you didn't have deal with any legal cya issues, how do stress test results change your management really? for a moment, i ask you to forget about the ACC guidelines, which will very likely be revised to look very different in the next year.
we know that there is no good data to support angioplasty/stent/CABG to reduce risk in patients undergoing surgery. so, if a patient has risk factors for CAD or has established CAD, why not treat them as such and forget about risk stratification. assume, they are all high risk. we're supposed to be maintaining adequate perfusion for everyone regardless if they have CAD or not. if they have risk factors for CAD beta block them.
i have begun to think that stress tests are more useful in identifying who may have CAD so that they can be beta blocked rather than stratifying them for any future intervention.
militarymd said:What you're describing is a philosophical change in preop evaluation that has developed in the last few years. An approach which I have adopted when Polderman published his data in NEJM in 1999?
The arguement for testing is that this allows you to identify patients who will benefit in the long term from revascularization.....ie >6 months...the benefit is not for the perioperative period.
jetproppilot said:This makes sense anecdotally as well- I always found it funny that we could put patients to sleep with tight triple vessel stenoses for their CABGs, but consider cancelling some other case for the same patient. How often does a CABG patient give you arrythmia/ST segment/hemodynamic problems pre-pump? Hardly ever.
UTSouthwestern said:Speak for yourself. I have seen more than a dozen the past six months that came in with L main or equivalent disease that needed IABP placement just to stabilize them enough to transport to the OR. Had two that had to crash onto bypass with EMD which presented while we were just preoxygenating!
jetproppilot said:Geez- either I'm very lucky or you are very unlucky. In my previous gig we did over 400 hearts a year and I can count on one hand the times we had to crash on bypass (in 7.5 years).
Guess my anesthesia is better, UT. Are you sure you pre-oxygenated correctly?
Of course you know I'm joking.
UTSouthwestern said:Speak for yourself. I have seen more than a dozen the past six months that came in with L main or equivalent disease that needed IABP placement just to stabilize them enough to transport to the OR. Had two that had to crash onto bypass with EMD which presented while we were just preoxygenating!
Tenesma said:takling about VADs.... i hate them with a vengeance.... those damn beasts allow heart surgeons to never declare anybody in the OR....
There is nothing worse than a guy who dies on the cath table being brought down to the OR... blue like a smurf... getting a 5 vessel CABG... unable to come off pump... go back on pump and place an LVAD... still can't come off pump... go back on pump and place and RVAD.... comes off pump with Levo at 1000mcg/min, Epi at 200mcg/min, Neo at 1500 mcg/min (yeah two different neo bags) etc.... just so that the family can wave goodbye in the SICU after 16 hours of slave work in the OR and 170 units of blood.... what a waste of resources....
UTSouthwestern said:Speak for yourself. I have seen more than a dozen the past six months that came in with L main or equivalent disease that needed IABP placement just to stabilize them enough to transport to the OR. Had two that had to crash onto bypass with EMD which presented while we were just preoxygenating!
don't miss doing those.Tenesma said:takling about VADs.... i hate them with a vengeance.... those damn beasts allow heart surgeons to never declare anybody in the OR....
There is nothing worse than a guy who dies on the cath table being brought down to the OR... blue like a smurf... getting a 5 vessel CABG... unable to come off pump... go back on pump and place an LVAD... still can't come off pump... go back on pump and place and RVAD.... comes off pump with Levo at 1000mcg/min, Epi at 200mcg/min, Neo at 1500 mcg/min (yeah two different neo bags) etc.... just so that the family can wave goodbye in the SICU after 16 hours of slave work in the OR and 170 units of blood.... what a waste of resources....
militarymd said:UT,
You've presented a different clinical situation than what we were discussing. What you describe is unstable coronary syndromes...either with thrombus formation or disease progression to the point where it is not compatible with further life.
The situation that jet and others were talking about was patients with moderate to severe but stable disease.
Patient's with stable disease rarely develop ischemia with GA....unless you cause hypotension.
UTSouthwestern said:We, Jet and I, were discussing patients with severe CADgoing to surgery and having signs/symptoms of ischemic changes at some point during the anesthetic (pre-pump or otherwise).
Half of the patients I was talking about were severe diabetics with no subjective symptoms reported.
I really like this color function.
VentdependenT said:I've never heard of a VAD before. Now I know. Subconsciously I always wanted a little plastic heart in my abdomen hooked up to a sweet fanny pack. Perhaps its better than dying....but I'd rather not find out the hard way.
VentdependenT said:Sign me up. This thing's overdue for an MI or lethal arrythmia thanks to the rapid infusion of Red Bull or Thermoblastamagigger GNC drink I put down every morning.
Alpha_Male said:Better stock up.........you'll need em' for Dr. Rothenberg.....
55 year old lady with no PMHx on no meds coming in for knee arthroscopy. She hurt her knee gardening.
Preop ecg.
Go or no go?