Last edited:
I have been with a new practice for the last 6 months or so and because of lag in credentialing with certain insurances I am being asked to perform injections and seeing patients under my employers EMR log-in (essentially under his name). I had been doing this for a few months to start as I understood there was a grace period of typically up to 90 days as long as there had been a submitted application for approval with the insurance companies. Every time that I would do procedures or see patients under his name, I would always sign my name on the chart. However, as it has been past the 90 days I have been advised not to continue to do so, especially as my employer is not in the same city as me. Actually most days he isn't even the same state (live on the border of two states). I have told them that I don't want to continue to do so because of potential legal concerns, but they obviously want to get reimbursed as do I. Is there validity to this and if so is there any way to get around this issue? Thanks.
I have been with a new practice for the last 6 months or so and because of lag in credentialing with certain insurances I am being asked to perform injections and seeing patients under my employers EMR log-in (essentially under his name). I had been doing this for a few months to start as I understood there was a grace period of typically up to 90 days as long as there had been a submitted application for approval with the insurance companies. Every time that I would do procedures or see patients under his name, I would always sign my name on the chart. However, as it has been past the 90 days I have been advised not to continue to do so, especially as my employer is not in the same city as me. Actually most days he isn't even the same state (live on the border of two states). I have told them that I don't want to continue to do so because of potential legal concerns, but they obviously want to get reimbursed as do I. Is there validity to this and if so is there any way to get around this issue? Thanks.
They seem to think that the practice is "too small" to draw any attention from governing agencies.
That is exactly what I told them, but they don't seem to want to listen nor think it's a big deal. I have my own log in and have been seeing patients and doing procedures under my own template as I am credentialed with most insurances now, but there are a few I am still pending. I have been just moving the patients/procedures with insurance that I am not yet credentialed on to my template and advising the billing company to hold off on submitting claims until I am credentialed. They seem to think that the practice is "too small" to draw any attention from governing agencies.
I would avoid this. Google “pederasty in Ancient Greece.”
Siri
Find me a new pain job for tomorrow
This is unfortunately the second job I've taken in about 1.5 years. The first was nightmare filled with legal issues and now it's pretty much the same with this practice. And I thought that I had done a good job of vetting this second job. But I guess not. Unfortunately this might be last the pain job for the foreseeable future as I don't really want to go through the headache of potentially dealing with this again. My non-compete is not great, but there aren't any other jobs available pain in my city anyways. There are no hospital employed pain positions in the city I live. In fact the 2 hospital systems don't have any pain doctors.
This has to be a made up story, u trollin us??
This really sucks for you.. but not as bad as legal problems. Approach the hospitals and offer your wares. You might be surprised. Pain practices are very profitable for hospitals and not that expensive to set up relative to other practices.
I would avoid this. Google “pederasty in Ancient Greece.”
This really sucks for you.. but not as bad as legal problems. Approach the hospitals and offer your wares. You might be surprised. Pain practices are very profitable for hospitals and not that expensive to set up relative to other practices.
900k and ur hospital based?6-900k. I make more doing less than I did I private practice. And when I want to take a day or week off I do it. Plenty of autonomy. This may not be true most places. I do lack the ability to order any equipment I want but I also don’t have to pay for it or worry about any day to day operations. Also I don’t have the fear of pissing of the one or two spine surgeons who refer to me because I refuse to take their ****show opioid patients.
6-900k. I make more doing less than I did I private practice. And when I want to take a day or week off I do it. Plenty of autonomy. This may not be true most places. I do lack the ability to order any equipment I want but I also don’t have to pay for it or worry about any day to day operations. Also I don’t have the fear of pissing of the one or two spine surgeons who refer to me because I refuse to take their ****show opioid patients.
I have been with a new practice for the last 6 months or so and because of lag in credentialing with certain insurances I am being asked to perform injections and seeing patients under my employers EMR log-in (essentially under his name). I had been doing this for a few months to start as I understood there was a grace period of typically up to 90 days as long as there had been a submitted application for approval with the insurance companies. Every time that I would do procedures or see patients under his name, I would always sign my name on the chart. However, as it has been past the 90 days I have been advised not to continue to do so, especially as my employer is not in the same city as me. Actually most days he isn't even the same state (live on the border of two states). I have told them that I don't want to continue to do so because of potential legal concerns, but they obviously want to get reimbursed as do I. Is there validity to this and if so is there any way to get around this issue? Thanks.
Are you getting any juice from facility fees or that pure RVU/production revenue?
Not an attorney, but don't think direct facility production $ back to an employed physician is allowable.