Hey all,
I had a weird experience yesterday doing cervical RF that has left me puzzled. Placed needles at lateral pillar of C4, C5, and C6 with pt in prone. Landed on os and walked the needles laterally hugging the waist. Felt very good about my placement, but had very brisk motor response with testing of C5 and C6. Thought perhaps I was too anterior (the alignment on fluoro wasn't perfect), so I backed out until my tips were at the midpoint of the trapezoid which got rid of the motor response at C5, but continued to have motor response at C6 needle despite multiple attempts to reposition. This was real motor stimulation with movement of the wrist and thumb.
As an experiment, I pulled back so far that I was now resting entirely posterior to the pillar, and still got positive motor response. Anatomically this doesn't make sense at all, and I'm super confused. I thought perhapas I was too generous with the local before placing the needles, so as an experiment I used minimal local to anesthetize the left side and placed a single needle at C6 in the posterior half of the trapezoid... and then got motor response on left side as well! Obviously did not proceed.
Is there something super obvious I'm overlooking? Fluoro images of the saga are attached.
I had a weird experience yesterday doing cervical RF that has left me puzzled. Placed needles at lateral pillar of C4, C5, and C6 with pt in prone. Landed on os and walked the needles laterally hugging the waist. Felt very good about my placement, but had very brisk motor response with testing of C5 and C6. Thought perhaps I was too anterior (the alignment on fluoro wasn't perfect), so I backed out until my tips were at the midpoint of the trapezoid which got rid of the motor response at C5, but continued to have motor response at C6 needle despite multiple attempts to reposition. This was real motor stimulation with movement of the wrist and thumb.
As an experiment, I pulled back so far that I was now resting entirely posterior to the pillar, and still got positive motor response. Anatomically this doesn't make sense at all, and I'm super confused. I thought perhapas I was too generous with the local before placing the needles, so as an experiment I used minimal local to anesthetize the left side and placed a single needle at C6 in the posterior half of the trapezoid... and then got motor response on left side as well! Obviously did not proceed.
Is there something super obvious I'm overlooking? Fluoro images of the saga are attached.