Last edited:
while a PhD (especially in the biomedical sciences) has very poor employability right now
hmmm, but where are they employed? From my understanding, most Phds in biochem are employed at positions that do not reflect the knowledge they've gained. (ie. technician, pharma representative...etc)
take a look:
http://chronicle.com/article/The-Real-Science-Crisis-Bleak/29178
Unemployment among PhDs? ~2%
Underemployed is not the same thing as unemployed.
Although here's something else to think about:
What would make you more competitive for the most prestigious positions in industry? PhD from Harvard/Stanford/Yale, or MD/PhD from far less prestigious schools such as Iowa/UAB/UTSW/Case?
It's the same reasoning as why MD/PhD's have an easier time getting grants than PhD's
Although here's something else to think about:
What would make you more competitive for the most prestigious positions in industry? PhD from Harvard/Stanford/Yale, or MD/PhD from far less prestigious schools such as Iowa/UAB/UTSW/Case?
This thread was not really supposed to be about names, but since you bring it up. If you are looking at nonacademic jobs, training at these "elite" institutions does not really make you a better applicant. I mean, who would you hire: the person who was so passionate about MD/PhD that they were willing to do it "anywhere" (by the way the insinuation that these schools are far less prestigious is totally laughable... and I did go to one of the big name schools so this is not just sour grapes), or the douchebag who just could not LIVE with himself without having a Harvard diploma on the wall. Plus, pharma does not give a hoot about prestige. They want people who have proven that they can get stuff done. When you see Genentech hiring people like this for the most prestigious positions in industry, they are being hired because they are badasses, not because they trained at fancy schools. Many of them did train with famous names, but you can't confuse correlation with causation.
Since you bumped this thread and I just read this, I'm surprised a poster said a school like UTSW with its multiple Nobel prize winning-researchers is "far less prestigious".
I've heard that MD/PhD's have a leg up over PhD's especially in things such as management consulting. It's the same reasoning as why MD/PhD's have an easier time getting grants than PhD's - even if they don't practice medicine at all, they can approach problems from a more translational perspective than their PhD counterparts.