- Joined
- Sep 24, 2009
- Messages
- 685
- Reaction score
- 27
I had a question from TBR about PE.
One of the passages gave a formula for the PE for long range attractions. It was given as U = -GMEm/R.
One of the questions asked, what is the relationship between the PE of Spacecraft A if it is at an orbital radius of R to the PE of Spacecraft B if it as at orbital radius of 3R.
The choices were:
A 9 to 1
B 3 to 1
C 1 to 3
D 1 to 9
Answer: B
From my knowledge. the relationship between U and the Radius should be proportional b/c of the negative sign. I.e. if I have a higher Radius, my denominator and thus GMem/R ratio gets smaller, and a smaller negative number is larger than a large negative number.
B/C I thought U(PE) was proportional to the Radius. My assumption was that the higher R, the higher PE I would have and thus C would be the correct answer choice. Does anyone know why that is not the case here? Any explanation would be more than welcome!
One of the passages gave a formula for the PE for long range attractions. It was given as U = -GMEm/R.
One of the questions asked, what is the relationship between the PE of Spacecraft A if it is at an orbital radius of R to the PE of Spacecraft B if it as at orbital radius of 3R.
The choices were:
A 9 to 1
B 3 to 1
C 1 to 3
D 1 to 9
Answer: B
From my knowledge. the relationship between U and the Radius should be proportional b/c of the negative sign. I.e. if I have a higher Radius, my denominator and thus GMem/R ratio gets smaller, and a smaller negative number is larger than a large negative number.
B/C I thought U(PE) was proportional to the Radius. My assumption was that the higher R, the higher PE I would have and thus C would be the correct answer choice. Does anyone know why that is not the case here? Any explanation would be more than welcome!