- Joined
- Jul 23, 2012
- Messages
- 2,780
- Reaction score
- 2,491
At the time of this posting, it's summer! This is not only a time of rest and relaxation, but also a time to get things done for medical school admissions. I've decided to create a comprehensive guide to maximizing your medical school application, for pre-meds from all over the spectrum, starting all the way in high school! I hope that you find this helpful. Please let me know what you think, and don't ever hesitate to message me any personal questions you might have. 🙂
Warning: This is my longest post ever. I needed to divide the main post into two parts due to the 32000 character limit. Due to the character limit, I also created separated yet connected threads in hSDN and the non-traditional forum. It encompasses just about every aspect of medical school admissions. I hope you enjoy it though!
If you're a high school student check this out first.
If you're a non-traditional student check this out first.
*A Little About Me*
So who exactly am I? What gives me the authority to give you such advice? Well, I started my pre-med journey many years ago actually, in the mid-2000s. I was a pre-med during my first semester of college. During that time, I discovered SDN and have looked at it ever since. After not doing so hot in general chemistry and getting freaked out, I dropped my medical school ambitions and continued with the business route that I initially set out on. I never stopped thinking about medicine, and always went on SDN through the years. After graduating college, I got a job working management in the airline industry. I absolutely hated it, and still thinking about medicine, I decided to quit after a year and do a post-bacc. After my post-bacc and MCAT, I got a job at a second airline as a backup job. I actually loved it there and miss it to this day, but I know in my heart that medicine is right for me.
I'm your typical medical student at a US medical school. But there's one thing about me that I don't think is typical. I believe that I don't exactly follow the common mindset that people have here on SDN (except I would really like an SDN author badge if you catch my drift 😉). In my opinion, I think that it's a great asset for me, and depending on the person you are, it can help you out greatly. Let me elaborate...
*The Pre-Med Philosophy... Who is Correct?*
There are two schools of thought in my opinion. One is the "SDN opinion," which people seem to regard as the best way to approach pre-med. I have a different opinion. I feel that it reflects more of the general population, and is still based on my original thoughts as a pre-med in the mid-2000s. Here they are in a nutshell:
The SDN Philosophy: The pre-med journey should be a meaningful one, where you do things that you're passionate about. You should grow significantly as a person. You will enjoy it, because if you don't, well then you don't want to know.
The Planes2Doc Philosophy: The purpose of pre-med is simple. Get a seat in medical school. The journey itself isn't important. Pre-med is potentially a huge sacrifice. Too many applicants put all of their eggs in one basket, and if medical school doesn't work out, then their lives can be ruined.
If you disagree with my philosophy, then STOP READING NOW. Read other threads on SDN, and do what they tell you. If you want a nice efficient way of getting into medical school, then keep reading.
*Approaching Pre-Med as a Traditional College Student*
Traditional college students make up the majority of pre-meds. If you just started college and want to maximize your medical school application, then you've definitely come to the right place. Now keep on reading! I'll help fill you in on what you need to know, answer commonly asked questions, and debunk some myths about the process.
-Choosing the Right Major-
You do not need to be a science major to get into medical school. Let me repeat that. You do not need to be a science major to get into medical school. Let me repeat that again, but this time bold it, italicize it, underline it, and change the color. You do not need to be a science major to get into medical school. People seem to be under the impression that you need to be a science major to get into medical school. This is not true. As long as you take the required per-requisite courses, MCAT, and jump through the extra curricular activity hoops, you will get into medical school assuming good stats, regardless of your major. In fact, if you are a science major and fail to get into medical school, you might have a hard time getting a good high-paying job in the future.
I know a few people who got "stuck" doing their ECs as their current jobs because they put all of their eggs into one basket as science majors, and didn't get into medical school. More on that later.
Here are the pros and cons of different types of majors:
1. Hard science majors - The pros of being a hard science major is that you'll likely prepare yourself well for the MCAT. You can also develop somewhat of a decent science foundation for medical school. The difficulty of medical school itself far exceeds that of undergraduate science coursework, so don't get too excited as of yet. The cons of being a hard science major is the difficulty in finding good jobs. When I was in the business world, I haven't met any science majors. The former pre-meds at my workplaces quit early on, and were able to switch their majors to something more practical for their careers. As mentioned above, I know people who got stuck working in their ECs after pre-med since they weren't able to find anything else. I hate seeing that. For some reason or another, most pre-meds seem to gravitate toward science majors, particularly in the biological sciences. If you don't mind doing something low-paying in science if medical school doesn't pan out, or might try for other healthcare professions as a backup, then go ahead and pick science. Otherwise, I might suggest other things.
2. Engineering majors - I'm under the assumption that engineering majors tend to have lower GPAs. If this is the case, then this might be killer for your medical school application. If you get a very high MCAT, you might need to do a masters program (SMP) in order to boost your grades. On the other hand, if you don't end up going to medical school, engineering majors do very well out in the real world. Despite the lower GPAs, you can secure a pretty good high-paying engineering job. Other professional schools often have lower GPAs of matriculants, which includes top business and top (Top 14) law schools. So if medical school doesn't pan out, you have an excellent choice of backups to go into. It's a tough trade-off though. So think wisely before committing to this major!
3. Business majors - This is a very practical major. I went this route actually. People pursuing business have all sorts of GPAs. High and low. If you go to a school that has an undergraduate program, you have a wide variety of majors to choose from. Some are easier than others. Some schools only have economics programs, which can be more tedious, but do not near the difficulty of majors like engineering. If medical school doesn't work out, then you have some great backup choices, as business is a very practical major. If you end up going to medical school and become a doctor, then this might provide a decent foundation for starting a private practice. Business is a pretty good way to go in my opinion. 👍
4. Liberal arts majors - This is the most well-rounded major. Medical schools like to see well-rounded applicants. But of course, most importantly, medical schools like to see applicants with good GPAs and MCAT scores.
If medical school doesn't work out, it can be hard to find a high-paying job as a liberal arts major. This is why many often go to graduate school.
The major you choose is up to you. Just make sure you choose wisely. And always have a backup plan in mind in case you don't end up going to medical school!
-Extra Curricular Activities-
Did you take a foreign language in high school? How about right now in college? Well guess what. You need to learn a new one! It's called "ECs" here on SDN. You can't just tell an ADCOM what they want to hear. Sure you can tell them that you want to be a primary care physician in an underserved area that provides free services to the poor on weekends. You know that's what they want to hear. So what's stopping you? Well, you need to speak their language. It's based on action. In order to show ADCOMs that you want to be a primary care physician in an underserved area that provides free services to the poor on weekends, you have to show them via activities. If you want to show ADCOMs that you're a nice person, you need to show them through action. Now what kinds of actions am I talking about?
I'm talking about extra curricular activities. Now you might be thinking that these are simply ways of helping to pad your application and if you have great stats, you don't need them, right? Wrong! Some of them are required. Some of them are unnecessary. So before you start freaking out and wasting your time by doing a bunch of things, I'll help you navigate through ECs as efficiently as possible so you can have a strong medical school application, all while enjoying your life at the same time.
Part I: The Meaning Behind ECs -> The purpose of ECs are for ADCOMs to gauge a variety of things. They want to see that you are a human being, not just some automaton that is churning out good grades and MCAT score. They want to see that you possess traits which are considered important to being a doctor, namely altruism. ADCOMs also want you to know what you're getting yourself into. This is where you get "clinical experience." Once you accumulate enough hours of it, you'll be considered good to go. There are a variety of ways to gain these experiences. People often refer to this as "box-checking," which unfortunately carries a negative connotation. ADCOMs want to see people who are passionate about what they do, not people who are just going through the motions for the sake of getting an acceptance into medical school. Unfortunately, the majority of applicants are box-checkers, and there's nothing wrong with it since some extra curriculars are essentially requirements. I'll help you find ways to make your activities look genuine, while putting in the minimal amount of effort so you can keep working on your grades, MCAT, and free time.
If you want to read my large post on the art of box-checking, check it out here: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...ckjack-and-the-art-of-checking-boxes.1073401/
Part II: The Highly Sought After Clinical Experience -> What exactly is clinical experience? I think that our ADCOM friend on this forum sums it up best: "If you are close enough to smell patients then it is clinical experience." -@LizzyM What you need to do is put yourself into a clinical environment. It can be something as simple as volunteering in the hospital. You do NOT need to do any form or paid work or learn any specific skills/procedures. This is not PA school. Medical school will start you from the beginning with everything. Therefore it doesn't matter if you were a lowly volunteer in a hospital emergency department, or part-time emergency medical technician (EMT), you will start at the beginning. Now while some schools might place a premium on paid clinical work, I wouldn't suggest doing it, and will explain why later. What I'm trying to say here is that all you need to do is smell the patient, as our ADCOM friend suggests. You do NOT need to poke, prod, lance, or do anything else with the patient. Just remember that the minimum will get you by, and is the smartest way to go.
Part III: How to Approach ECs -> There are two types of philosophies once again, and here they are:
The SDN EC Philosophy: Do what you're passionate about.
The Planes2Doc EC Philosophy: Do what ADCOMs want you to be passionate about.
The SDN EC Philosophy is something you'll read over and over on this site from a variety of different members. If I had a nickel for every time I've read it, I'd be a rich man right now. Okay, so if you are honest with yourself and do only what you're passionate about, you'll probably never get into medical school. Sorry, being a typical college student just doesn't look good. ADCOMs don't want to hear about how you hang out with friends, go to parties, workout, play video, games, etc... Yes there are people who are genuinely passionate about things that should go on a medical school application, but these people are very rare. I can count on one hand the number of genuinely altruistic people that I have met in my lifetime. Now don't forget, I'm a medical student, so I've met a lot of fellow classmates that had to volunteer and do plenty of ECs for their application. It's your job to do specific ECs to make you look passionate about them, whether you actually like them or not.
Part IV: ECs and the Honor System -> It's kind of funny. You're treated like a common criminal when you take the MCAT. You probably take your college exams in fairly controlled environments. But when it comes to ECs, reporting is entirely based on the honor system. It's a far cry from the MCAT test-taking experience. Therefore you can write literally anything you want with whatever hours you want. Do I suggest doing that? No. Lying is dishonest. Plus we all know that if you're caught cheating within the honor system, the penalties are incredibly severe. It's very common to embellish ECs. If you're volunteering in a hospital, you don't want to tell ADCOMs how you spend a majority of your time cleaning beds and restocking supplies. You want to tell them about the patient contact experiences that were instrumental in your decision to become a physician. Embellishing hours is also a commonly-accepted practice, but no one has officially ever drawn the line between cheating and honesty. For instance, someone who volunteered for 294 hours might write that they volunteered for 300. Someone who volunteered for 274 hours might write that they volunteered for 300. Someone who volunteered for 30 hours might write that they volunteered for 300. Who is honest? Who is dishonest? No one officially drew the line anywhere. If your volunteer site has a computerized logging system, then it's very easy to call and verify the number of hours. If it doesn't, I suggest using an Excel spreadsheet. If you feel the need to embellish hours, then do whatever allows you to sleep at night. I'm not advocating lying, but rounding up slightly to a nice round number is pretty innocent. Fabricating ECs, on the other hand, is completely wrong. It's like playing Russian roulette. You can get into medical school, but you'll need to watch your back. If your past is ever discovered, then you can get expelled.
ECs are also like Vegas, minus 99% of the fun. What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Same with your ECs. What you tell the ADCOMs is only bounded by what lets you sleep at night. Either you embellish a crappy experience into something amazing, or you are completely honest about it. It's your choice, not mine. If your goal is to get into medical school, then it might be in your best interest to find crappy experiences for reasons that I will mention below. If you feel the need to make pre-med a meaningful journey full of great personal growth, then find experiences which you enjoy. You'll have pre-meds that do all sorts of experiences. Good or bad. It's your choice, not mine. You're the one that needs to sleep at night.
Part V: Volunteering Whether You Want to or Not -> I hate it that service is called "volunteering" when it comes to medical school admissions. I wish that they would change the name to "community service." Volunteering is most definitely a requirement. So whether you want to volunteer or not, you'll have to do it. Very few people get in without volunteering. I'm guessing that they are people with heavy research and incredibly high stats, or maybe BS/MD students since they probably don't end up doing these activities in college. Close to 90% of matriculants each year have volunteering on your application. Applying to medical school without volunteering is like walking around with your pants wrapped around your ankles. You'll stand out, and not in a good way. Since volunteering has become a solid part of the medical school application, it's not something that will make stand out. Doing it won't make you look good, it will just prevent you from looking bad.
MYTH or FACT: Volunteering Sucks - MYTH. Volunteering doesn't suck. Pre-med volunteering gigs typically do suck though. Pre-meds have developed quite a nasty reputation among hospital and volunteer organizations over the years. This is why "typical" pre-med volunteer hot spots like hospital emergency departments often treat their pre-med volunteers like garbage. They often force them to do free labor, and not give them any respect. You might have better luck if you volunteer in a non-clinical setting, or if your clinical volunteering is far away from a college campus (less pre-meds). Based on the things I've written on this site, you would think that I hate volunteering. That couldn't be further from the truth. I absolutely loved my sporadic non-clinical volunteering as a pre-med, and wished I did more. Now as a medical student, I try to volunteer once a week. The organization is great. I am treated with plenty of respect, and am never forced to do free labor (I would refuse to do it since I am no longer pre-med). I genuinely enjoy it. I hope that pre-med volunteering or forced community service high school/college graduation requirements don't put you off from volunteering. It can be very meaningful and lots of fun. But then again, if it's something you don't enjoy or simply don't want to do, then that's fine. That's the whole point of volunteering, it's doing something because you want to, not because you're forced to. No one should be judged for not wanting to do, like people are on this site.
There are two types of volunteering: Clinical and non-clinical. You're only required to have one (you need clinical experience regardless), though it's better to have both, since most applicants will have hours for both. If your main goal is to get into medical school, then you'll definitely want consistent clinical volunteering coupled with sporadic non-clinical volunteering.
Part VI: Clinical Volunteering -> Clinical volunteering is the most commonly done volunteering, and for good reasons. First of all, you initially kill two birds with one stone. You check the box for clinical experience and also a second box for volunteering at the same time. In my opinion, hospital volunteering is the best bang for the buck when it comes to medical school admissions. When I volunteered as a pre-med, I absolutely dreaded 99% of my time volunteering in the hospital ED. I was treated like garbage, and was asked to do lots of free labor. I was upset because I felt like I was lining the pockets of the hospital board of directors more than anything else. I had some good patient experiences, and maybe a good day or two, but as a whole, the experience was terrible. Looking back, it was great? Why? Am I nuts? Nope!
No, I'm not a nut like Mr. Peanut. I realized that I was very lucky since these volunteer opportunities are usually a minimal commitment of four hours per week. The hospital volunteering had minimal impact on my grades. I was also able to squeeze some shadowing in during my volunteer shifts. This helps you get even more bang for your buck since you can add yet another important part to your application all while racking up volunteer hours. Sure I was upset with not making any money, but you do have to pay for convenience. I used to think that entry-level clinical jobs were the way to go combined with non-clinical volunteering. But looking back, I realized that they aren't worth it even though you make money. I'll explain this a little bit later and provide you with some math. Overall though, if you're looking for something that will kill multiple birds with one stone all while requiring a minimal commitment, clinical volunteering is the way to go.
Part VII: Non-Clinical Volunteering -> If you already have clinical volunteering, non-clinical volunteering is not required, but highly recommended. If you are doing an entry-level clinical job in place on clinical volunteering, then you're required to have a consistent volunteer commitment, whether clinical or non-clinical. I personally enjoyed my non-clinical volunteering a lot. These don't typically get lots of pre-meds, so you will probably be treated well as long as you're putting in a good effort. If you want to maximize your medical school application, I would recommend piggy-backing a sporadic non-clinical volunteering gig (once every few weeks) on top of a consistent weekly clinical volunteering gig. The clinical volunteering is what will get your foot in the door for interviews by having the right boxes checked, but the non-clinical experience is what will set you apart and give you interesting things to talk about during interviews. If you are working an entry-level clinical job or decided to discontinue clinical volunteering, then you must make sure your non-clinical volunteering is a consistent weekly commitment. These are also great opportunities to do good things with your hobbies. Do you enjoy photography? Why not do free photography for charities? Do you enjoy teaching? Why not tutor underprivileged children? There are so many possibilities! Hopefully you can find something meaningful that you enjoy. If not, then that's fine too.
Part VIII: International Volunteering -> When I was a pre-med initially, I told myself that I was going to do a mission trip to Brazil (the country I wanted to visit most) and that this would make me a highly desirable applicant that ADCOMs would drool over. I thought that you could do international volunteering in place of domestic clinical volunteering. But I learned that it's not the case. Pre-meds are like King Midas, they ruin everything they touch. I'm guessing that years ago international mission trips probably helped get pre-meds into medical school, but that's not the case anymore. If you do a short two-week trip, you're likely doing nothing more than throwing away your money, unless you care about that local population of course. If not, I would recommend spending that money on a vacation package from a website like Expedia.com. You'll have a lot more fun that way. Now of course if you care about that local population, you can write a check directly to an organization that will help them. But sadly that won't look good on your medical school application. 😳
If you want more information on why medical mission trips won't dramatically improve your application, then read this thread: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...oseph-kony-and-why-you-shouldnt-do-it.994079/
COMMONLY ASKED QUESTION: Which volunteering experience looks better? Option A, Option B, Option C, or Option D? - You see these threads all the time on SDN. Someone who is about to start volunteering lists usually three or four different experiences, and asks which one looks best. You'll usually have a bunch of responses saying to do one over the other. But what's the correct answer? Assuming your main goal is to get into medical school, it's going to be the same one every single time. It doesn't matter what the different volunteering options are. They are red herring.
Do whatever fits best in your schedule, and what allows you to get the best grades and MCAT score possible. In other words, do the volunteer experience with the shortest commute, or perhaps the volunteering experience that allows for downtime so that you can study for school. In all of my years of viewing SDN, I have never heard anyone ask how they can help more people with their ECs, they only ask about how they can help themselves. So if you genuinely want to help the most people possible, then do the activity you care about most in which you can help the most people. But if you're concerned about helping yourself and your medical school application, then do whatever will be most convenient. Why do the options not matter? Because over the years, ADCOMs have seen virtually everything under the sun. Whether you volunteer at a hospital ED, free clinic, ICU, or wherever else, it will all look the same to them. If there was really something superior (which I'll debunk), then everyone would be flocking there instead. Just make sure you can come off as passionate and have things to talk about. Where you volunteer isn't important. It all depends on what you want, whether you want to help others, or to help yourself. I'm not judging, and neither should anyone else on this site.
MYTH or FACT: Quality > Quantity - MIX OF BOTH. Another thing you commonly hear on this site is how quality is more important than the quantity of hours. This is partially true. First, you need to reach a "magic" number of volunteer hours to get your application in the door. This is usually in the 150+ hour range. Because let's face it, if you did something you thought was AMAZING, but it only took place every few months, then you'd have barely any hours, and wouldn't be able to land yourself an interview because you'd come off as a selfish applicant. Oh the irony! 😛 This is why I suggest piggy-backing a non-clinical volunteer experience on top of a crappy clinical volunteer experience. If you're applying to service-focused schools, you'll definitely need a large number of hours. So remember, you need to get both, a nice amount of hours and good things to talk about.
MYTH or FACT: Volunteering A is Superior to Volunteering B - MYTH. Nothing sounds more ridiculous than saying that your volunteering is superior to someone else's. Okay, let's rephrase that. It's like saying your helping people is superior to someone else's helping people.
Yeah, thanks Jackie Chan! Pre-meds are under the mentality that the more you do, the better. This is why some pre-meds gravitate toward volunteering in places like free clinics, or overseas (don't fall into that trap). They clearly aren't taking LizzyM's advice, that all you need to do is smell the patient. They feel like learning arbitrary skills will help improve their application. Look, if you genuinely care about the poor, then go ahead and volunteer at a free clinic. It's nice because they actually provide free services to the poor. When I was pre-med, all of the nearby free clinics in Chicago were filled to the brim with pre-meds. Pre-meds aren't necessarily volunteering there because they care about the poor, it's because they feel that they can go beyond their scope of practice as volunteers, and do more things to the patients. As a hospital volunteer, you probably won't be allowed to even shake a patient's hand. Look, it sounds ridiculous when people say that one form of volunteering is superior to another. We're all helping people, right? That's the point, right? Well as long as you tell ADCOMs that you were there to help people, everything should look good, whether you couldn't touch the patient, or if you were taking vitals.
COMMONLY ASKED QUESTION: Is it better to volunteer at a more prestigious hospital? - It doesn't make a difference. As a volunteer, you can volunteer at a local no-name hospital, or you can volunteer at Massachusetts General which is a part of Harvard! One isn't going to make you look better than the other. You entered a non-selective position which anyone can do. If you're a janitor, food service person, or administrative assistant at Massachusetts General, does that make you any more prestigious than a person in a similar position elsewhere? Nope. Now if you are a physician at Massachusetts General, then I'd be impressed. Volunteer where it's most convenient. Plus you'll likely be on a very long waiting list at a prestigious institution. You'll probably be able to volunteer by the time you're already accepted to medical school. 😀
Part IX: The Best Way to Approach Volunteering and Make it Look Good -> This is pulled directly from my other thread since it's relevant:
Warning: This is my longest post ever. I needed to divide the main post into two parts due to the 32000 character limit. Due to the character limit, I also created separated yet connected threads in hSDN and the non-traditional forum. It encompasses just about every aspect of medical school admissions. I hope you enjoy it though!
If you're a high school student check this out first.
If you're a non-traditional student check this out first.
*A Little About Me*
So who exactly am I? What gives me the authority to give you such advice? Well, I started my pre-med journey many years ago actually, in the mid-2000s. I was a pre-med during my first semester of college. During that time, I discovered SDN and have looked at it ever since. After not doing so hot in general chemistry and getting freaked out, I dropped my medical school ambitions and continued with the business route that I initially set out on. I never stopped thinking about medicine, and always went on SDN through the years. After graduating college, I got a job working management in the airline industry. I absolutely hated it, and still thinking about medicine, I decided to quit after a year and do a post-bacc. After my post-bacc and MCAT, I got a job at a second airline as a backup job. I actually loved it there and miss it to this day, but I know in my heart that medicine is right for me.
I'm your typical medical student at a US medical school. But there's one thing about me that I don't think is typical. I believe that I don't exactly follow the common mindset that people have here on SDN (except I would really like an SDN author badge if you catch my drift 😉). In my opinion, I think that it's a great asset for me, and depending on the person you are, it can help you out greatly. Let me elaborate...
*The Pre-Med Philosophy... Who is Correct?*
There are two schools of thought in my opinion. One is the "SDN opinion," which people seem to regard as the best way to approach pre-med. I have a different opinion. I feel that it reflects more of the general population, and is still based on my original thoughts as a pre-med in the mid-2000s. Here they are in a nutshell:
The SDN Philosophy: The pre-med journey should be a meaningful one, where you do things that you're passionate about. You should grow significantly as a person. You will enjoy it, because if you don't, well then you don't want to know.
The Planes2Doc Philosophy: The purpose of pre-med is simple. Get a seat in medical school. The journey itself isn't important. Pre-med is potentially a huge sacrifice. Too many applicants put all of their eggs in one basket, and if medical school doesn't work out, then their lives can be ruined.
If you disagree with my philosophy, then STOP READING NOW. Read other threads on SDN, and do what they tell you. If you want a nice efficient way of getting into medical school, then keep reading.
*Approaching Pre-Med as a Traditional College Student*
Traditional college students make up the majority of pre-meds. If you just started college and want to maximize your medical school application, then you've definitely come to the right place. Now keep on reading! I'll help fill you in on what you need to know, answer commonly asked questions, and debunk some myths about the process.
-Choosing the Right Major-
You do not need to be a science major to get into medical school. Let me repeat that. You do not need to be a science major to get into medical school. Let me repeat that again, but this time bold it, italicize it, underline it, and change the color. You do not need to be a science major to get into medical school. People seem to be under the impression that you need to be a science major to get into medical school. This is not true. As long as you take the required per-requisite courses, MCAT, and jump through the extra curricular activity hoops, you will get into medical school assuming good stats, regardless of your major. In fact, if you are a science major and fail to get into medical school, you might have a hard time getting a good high-paying job in the future.
Here are the pros and cons of different types of majors:
1. Hard science majors - The pros of being a hard science major is that you'll likely prepare yourself well for the MCAT. You can also develop somewhat of a decent science foundation for medical school. The difficulty of medical school itself far exceeds that of undergraduate science coursework, so don't get too excited as of yet. The cons of being a hard science major is the difficulty in finding good jobs. When I was in the business world, I haven't met any science majors. The former pre-meds at my workplaces quit early on, and were able to switch their majors to something more practical for their careers. As mentioned above, I know people who got stuck working in their ECs after pre-med since they weren't able to find anything else. I hate seeing that. For some reason or another, most pre-meds seem to gravitate toward science majors, particularly in the biological sciences. If you don't mind doing something low-paying in science if medical school doesn't pan out, or might try for other healthcare professions as a backup, then go ahead and pick science. Otherwise, I might suggest other things.
2. Engineering majors - I'm under the assumption that engineering majors tend to have lower GPAs. If this is the case, then this might be killer for your medical school application. If you get a very high MCAT, you might need to do a masters program (SMP) in order to boost your grades. On the other hand, if you don't end up going to medical school, engineering majors do very well out in the real world. Despite the lower GPAs, you can secure a pretty good high-paying engineering job. Other professional schools often have lower GPAs of matriculants, which includes top business and top (Top 14) law schools. So if medical school doesn't pan out, you have an excellent choice of backups to go into. It's a tough trade-off though. So think wisely before committing to this major!
3. Business majors - This is a very practical major. I went this route actually. People pursuing business have all sorts of GPAs. High and low. If you go to a school that has an undergraduate program, you have a wide variety of majors to choose from. Some are easier than others. Some schools only have economics programs, which can be more tedious, but do not near the difficulty of majors like engineering. If medical school doesn't work out, then you have some great backup choices, as business is a very practical major. If you end up going to medical school and become a doctor, then this might provide a decent foundation for starting a private practice. Business is a pretty good way to go in my opinion. 👍
4. Liberal arts majors - This is the most well-rounded major. Medical schools like to see well-rounded applicants. But of course, most importantly, medical schools like to see applicants with good GPAs and MCAT scores.
The major you choose is up to you. Just make sure you choose wisely. And always have a backup plan in mind in case you don't end up going to medical school!
-Extra Curricular Activities-
Did you take a foreign language in high school? How about right now in college? Well guess what. You need to learn a new one! It's called "ECs" here on SDN. You can't just tell an ADCOM what they want to hear. Sure you can tell them that you want to be a primary care physician in an underserved area that provides free services to the poor on weekends. You know that's what they want to hear. So what's stopping you? Well, you need to speak their language. It's based on action. In order to show ADCOMs that you want to be a primary care physician in an underserved area that provides free services to the poor on weekends, you have to show them via activities. If you want to show ADCOMs that you're a nice person, you need to show them through action. Now what kinds of actions am I talking about?
I'm talking about extra curricular activities. Now you might be thinking that these are simply ways of helping to pad your application and if you have great stats, you don't need them, right? Wrong! Some of them are required. Some of them are unnecessary. So before you start freaking out and wasting your time by doing a bunch of things, I'll help you navigate through ECs as efficiently as possible so you can have a strong medical school application, all while enjoying your life at the same time.
Part I: The Meaning Behind ECs -> The purpose of ECs are for ADCOMs to gauge a variety of things. They want to see that you are a human being, not just some automaton that is churning out good grades and MCAT score. They want to see that you possess traits which are considered important to being a doctor, namely altruism. ADCOMs also want you to know what you're getting yourself into. This is where you get "clinical experience." Once you accumulate enough hours of it, you'll be considered good to go. There are a variety of ways to gain these experiences. People often refer to this as "box-checking," which unfortunately carries a negative connotation. ADCOMs want to see people who are passionate about what they do, not people who are just going through the motions for the sake of getting an acceptance into medical school. Unfortunately, the majority of applicants are box-checkers, and there's nothing wrong with it since some extra curriculars are essentially requirements. I'll help you find ways to make your activities look genuine, while putting in the minimal amount of effort so you can keep working on your grades, MCAT, and free time.
If you want to read my large post on the art of box-checking, check it out here: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...ckjack-and-the-art-of-checking-boxes.1073401/
Part II: The Highly Sought After Clinical Experience -> What exactly is clinical experience? I think that our ADCOM friend on this forum sums it up best: "If you are close enough to smell patients then it is clinical experience." -@LizzyM What you need to do is put yourself into a clinical environment. It can be something as simple as volunteering in the hospital. You do NOT need to do any form or paid work or learn any specific skills/procedures. This is not PA school. Medical school will start you from the beginning with everything. Therefore it doesn't matter if you were a lowly volunteer in a hospital emergency department, or part-time emergency medical technician (EMT), you will start at the beginning. Now while some schools might place a premium on paid clinical work, I wouldn't suggest doing it, and will explain why later. What I'm trying to say here is that all you need to do is smell the patient, as our ADCOM friend suggests. You do NOT need to poke, prod, lance, or do anything else with the patient. Just remember that the minimum will get you by, and is the smartest way to go.
Part III: How to Approach ECs -> There are two types of philosophies once again, and here they are:
The SDN EC Philosophy: Do what you're passionate about.
The Planes2Doc EC Philosophy: Do what ADCOMs want you to be passionate about.
The SDN EC Philosophy is something you'll read over and over on this site from a variety of different members. If I had a nickel for every time I've read it, I'd be a rich man right now. Okay, so if you are honest with yourself and do only what you're passionate about, you'll probably never get into medical school. Sorry, being a typical college student just doesn't look good. ADCOMs don't want to hear about how you hang out with friends, go to parties, workout, play video, games, etc... Yes there are people who are genuinely passionate about things that should go on a medical school application, but these people are very rare. I can count on one hand the number of genuinely altruistic people that I have met in my lifetime. Now don't forget, I'm a medical student, so I've met a lot of fellow classmates that had to volunteer and do plenty of ECs for their application. It's your job to do specific ECs to make you look passionate about them, whether you actually like them or not.
Part IV: ECs and the Honor System -> It's kind of funny. You're treated like a common criminal when you take the MCAT. You probably take your college exams in fairly controlled environments. But when it comes to ECs, reporting is entirely based on the honor system. It's a far cry from the MCAT test-taking experience. Therefore you can write literally anything you want with whatever hours you want. Do I suggest doing that? No. Lying is dishonest. Plus we all know that if you're caught cheating within the honor system, the penalties are incredibly severe. It's very common to embellish ECs. If you're volunteering in a hospital, you don't want to tell ADCOMs how you spend a majority of your time cleaning beds and restocking supplies. You want to tell them about the patient contact experiences that were instrumental in your decision to become a physician. Embellishing hours is also a commonly-accepted practice, but no one has officially ever drawn the line between cheating and honesty. For instance, someone who volunteered for 294 hours might write that they volunteered for 300. Someone who volunteered for 274 hours might write that they volunteered for 300. Someone who volunteered for 30 hours might write that they volunteered for 300. Who is honest? Who is dishonest? No one officially drew the line anywhere. If your volunteer site has a computerized logging system, then it's very easy to call and verify the number of hours. If it doesn't, I suggest using an Excel spreadsheet. If you feel the need to embellish hours, then do whatever allows you to sleep at night. I'm not advocating lying, but rounding up slightly to a nice round number is pretty innocent. Fabricating ECs, on the other hand, is completely wrong. It's like playing Russian roulette. You can get into medical school, but you'll need to watch your back. If your past is ever discovered, then you can get expelled.
ECs are also like Vegas, minus 99% of the fun. What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Same with your ECs. What you tell the ADCOMs is only bounded by what lets you sleep at night. Either you embellish a crappy experience into something amazing, or you are completely honest about it. It's your choice, not mine. If your goal is to get into medical school, then it might be in your best interest to find crappy experiences for reasons that I will mention below. If you feel the need to make pre-med a meaningful journey full of great personal growth, then find experiences which you enjoy. You'll have pre-meds that do all sorts of experiences. Good or bad. It's your choice, not mine. You're the one that needs to sleep at night.

Part V: Volunteering Whether You Want to or Not -> I hate it that service is called "volunteering" when it comes to medical school admissions. I wish that they would change the name to "community service." Volunteering is most definitely a requirement. So whether you want to volunteer or not, you'll have to do it. Very few people get in without volunteering. I'm guessing that they are people with heavy research and incredibly high stats, or maybe BS/MD students since they probably don't end up doing these activities in college. Close to 90% of matriculants each year have volunteering on your application. Applying to medical school without volunteering is like walking around with your pants wrapped around your ankles. You'll stand out, and not in a good way. Since volunteering has become a solid part of the medical school application, it's not something that will make stand out. Doing it won't make you look good, it will just prevent you from looking bad.
MYTH or FACT: Volunteering Sucks - MYTH. Volunteering doesn't suck. Pre-med volunteering gigs typically do suck though. Pre-meds have developed quite a nasty reputation among hospital and volunteer organizations over the years. This is why "typical" pre-med volunteer hot spots like hospital emergency departments often treat their pre-med volunteers like garbage. They often force them to do free labor, and not give them any respect. You might have better luck if you volunteer in a non-clinical setting, or if your clinical volunteering is far away from a college campus (less pre-meds). Based on the things I've written on this site, you would think that I hate volunteering. That couldn't be further from the truth. I absolutely loved my sporadic non-clinical volunteering as a pre-med, and wished I did more. Now as a medical student, I try to volunteer once a week. The organization is great. I am treated with plenty of respect, and am never forced to do free labor (I would refuse to do it since I am no longer pre-med). I genuinely enjoy it. I hope that pre-med volunteering or forced community service high school/college graduation requirements don't put you off from volunteering. It can be very meaningful and lots of fun. But then again, if it's something you don't enjoy or simply don't want to do, then that's fine. That's the whole point of volunteering, it's doing something because you want to, not because you're forced to. No one should be judged for not wanting to do, like people are on this site.
There are two types of volunteering: Clinical and non-clinical. You're only required to have one (you need clinical experience regardless), though it's better to have both, since most applicants will have hours for both. If your main goal is to get into medical school, then you'll definitely want consistent clinical volunteering coupled with sporadic non-clinical volunteering.
Part VI: Clinical Volunteering -> Clinical volunteering is the most commonly done volunteering, and for good reasons. First of all, you initially kill two birds with one stone. You check the box for clinical experience and also a second box for volunteering at the same time. In my opinion, hospital volunteering is the best bang for the buck when it comes to medical school admissions. When I volunteered as a pre-med, I absolutely dreaded 99% of my time volunteering in the hospital ED. I was treated like garbage, and was asked to do lots of free labor. I was upset because I felt like I was lining the pockets of the hospital board of directors more than anything else. I had some good patient experiences, and maybe a good day or two, but as a whole, the experience was terrible. Looking back, it was great? Why? Am I nuts? Nope!

No, I'm not a nut like Mr. Peanut. I realized that I was very lucky since these volunteer opportunities are usually a minimal commitment of four hours per week. The hospital volunteering had minimal impact on my grades. I was also able to squeeze some shadowing in during my volunteer shifts. This helps you get even more bang for your buck since you can add yet another important part to your application all while racking up volunteer hours. Sure I was upset with not making any money, but you do have to pay for convenience. I used to think that entry-level clinical jobs were the way to go combined with non-clinical volunteering. But looking back, I realized that they aren't worth it even though you make money. I'll explain this a little bit later and provide you with some math. Overall though, if you're looking for something that will kill multiple birds with one stone all while requiring a minimal commitment, clinical volunteering is the way to go.
Part VII: Non-Clinical Volunteering -> If you already have clinical volunteering, non-clinical volunteering is not required, but highly recommended. If you are doing an entry-level clinical job in place on clinical volunteering, then you're required to have a consistent volunteer commitment, whether clinical or non-clinical. I personally enjoyed my non-clinical volunteering a lot. These don't typically get lots of pre-meds, so you will probably be treated well as long as you're putting in a good effort. If you want to maximize your medical school application, I would recommend piggy-backing a sporadic non-clinical volunteering gig (once every few weeks) on top of a consistent weekly clinical volunteering gig. The clinical volunteering is what will get your foot in the door for interviews by having the right boxes checked, but the non-clinical experience is what will set you apart and give you interesting things to talk about during interviews. If you are working an entry-level clinical job or decided to discontinue clinical volunteering, then you must make sure your non-clinical volunteering is a consistent weekly commitment. These are also great opportunities to do good things with your hobbies. Do you enjoy photography? Why not do free photography for charities? Do you enjoy teaching? Why not tutor underprivileged children? There are so many possibilities! Hopefully you can find something meaningful that you enjoy. If not, then that's fine too.
Part VIII: International Volunteering -> When I was a pre-med initially, I told myself that I was going to do a mission trip to Brazil (the country I wanted to visit most) and that this would make me a highly desirable applicant that ADCOMs would drool over. I thought that you could do international volunteering in place of domestic clinical volunteering. But I learned that it's not the case. Pre-meds are like King Midas, they ruin everything they touch. I'm guessing that years ago international mission trips probably helped get pre-meds into medical school, but that's not the case anymore. If you do a short two-week trip, you're likely doing nothing more than throwing away your money, unless you care about that local population of course. If not, I would recommend spending that money on a vacation package from a website like Expedia.com. You'll have a lot more fun that way. Now of course if you care about that local population, you can write a check directly to an organization that will help them. But sadly that won't look good on your medical school application. 😳
If you want more information on why medical mission trips won't dramatically improve your application, then read this thread: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...oseph-kony-and-why-you-shouldnt-do-it.994079/
COMMONLY ASKED QUESTION: Which volunteering experience looks better? Option A, Option B, Option C, or Option D? - You see these threads all the time on SDN. Someone who is about to start volunteering lists usually three or four different experiences, and asks which one looks best. You'll usually have a bunch of responses saying to do one over the other. But what's the correct answer? Assuming your main goal is to get into medical school, it's going to be the same one every single time. It doesn't matter what the different volunteering options are. They are red herring.

Do whatever fits best in your schedule, and what allows you to get the best grades and MCAT score possible. In other words, do the volunteer experience with the shortest commute, or perhaps the volunteering experience that allows for downtime so that you can study for school. In all of my years of viewing SDN, I have never heard anyone ask how they can help more people with their ECs, they only ask about how they can help themselves. So if you genuinely want to help the most people possible, then do the activity you care about most in which you can help the most people. But if you're concerned about helping yourself and your medical school application, then do whatever will be most convenient. Why do the options not matter? Because over the years, ADCOMs have seen virtually everything under the sun. Whether you volunteer at a hospital ED, free clinic, ICU, or wherever else, it will all look the same to them. If there was really something superior (which I'll debunk), then everyone would be flocking there instead. Just make sure you can come off as passionate and have things to talk about. Where you volunteer isn't important. It all depends on what you want, whether you want to help others, or to help yourself. I'm not judging, and neither should anyone else on this site.
MYTH or FACT: Quality > Quantity - MIX OF BOTH. Another thing you commonly hear on this site is how quality is more important than the quantity of hours. This is partially true. First, you need to reach a "magic" number of volunteer hours to get your application in the door. This is usually in the 150+ hour range. Because let's face it, if you did something you thought was AMAZING, but it only took place every few months, then you'd have barely any hours, and wouldn't be able to land yourself an interview because you'd come off as a selfish applicant. Oh the irony! 😛 This is why I suggest piggy-backing a non-clinical volunteer experience on top of a crappy clinical volunteer experience. If you're applying to service-focused schools, you'll definitely need a large number of hours. So remember, you need to get both, a nice amount of hours and good things to talk about.
MYTH or FACT: Volunteering A is Superior to Volunteering B - MYTH. Nothing sounds more ridiculous than saying that your volunteering is superior to someone else's. Okay, let's rephrase that. It's like saying your helping people is superior to someone else's helping people.

Yeah, thanks Jackie Chan! Pre-meds are under the mentality that the more you do, the better. This is why some pre-meds gravitate toward volunteering in places like free clinics, or overseas (don't fall into that trap). They clearly aren't taking LizzyM's advice, that all you need to do is smell the patient. They feel like learning arbitrary skills will help improve their application. Look, if you genuinely care about the poor, then go ahead and volunteer at a free clinic. It's nice because they actually provide free services to the poor. When I was pre-med, all of the nearby free clinics in Chicago were filled to the brim with pre-meds. Pre-meds aren't necessarily volunteering there because they care about the poor, it's because they feel that they can go beyond their scope of practice as volunteers, and do more things to the patients. As a hospital volunteer, you probably won't be allowed to even shake a patient's hand. Look, it sounds ridiculous when people say that one form of volunteering is superior to another. We're all helping people, right? That's the point, right? Well as long as you tell ADCOMs that you were there to help people, everything should look good, whether you couldn't touch the patient, or if you were taking vitals.
COMMONLY ASKED QUESTION: Is it better to volunteer at a more prestigious hospital? - It doesn't make a difference. As a volunteer, you can volunteer at a local no-name hospital, or you can volunteer at Massachusetts General which is a part of Harvard! One isn't going to make you look better than the other. You entered a non-selective position which anyone can do. If you're a janitor, food service person, or administrative assistant at Massachusetts General, does that make you any more prestigious than a person in a similar position elsewhere? Nope. Now if you are a physician at Massachusetts General, then I'd be impressed. Volunteer where it's most convenient. Plus you'll likely be on a very long waiting list at a prestigious institution. You'll probably be able to volunteer by the time you're already accepted to medical school. 😀
Part IX: The Best Way to Approach Volunteering and Make it Look Good -> This is pulled directly from my other thread since it's relevant:
Last edited: