Last edited:
Hi, I need help on making a decision and was wondering if SDN people can help me to decide.
I graduated undergraduate with 2.34 GPA and majored in Biology. I passed all of my science courses with C or better except for organic chemistry I which I got D in (I got C in organic chemistry II).
With that said, I applied to couple of post-bacc programs/master's programs hoping that I can improve my academic record. I got into Northeastern Univeristy's pre-medical post-bacc program (undergraduate) and Mississippi College's 1-year MS in Medical Sciences (graduate). Since I am trying to enhance my academic record to make myself a better candidate for dental school, I didn't know which route to take.
Would it be better for me to take few 400 level undergraduate courses at Northeastern retaking organic chemistry (increasing my undergraduate GPA to about 2.5~2.7) and start master's program after a year or is it better for me to just go straight to master's program keeping my current undergraduate GPA?
Please help and share some of your thoughts! I would really appreciate it!
thanks for your input! do you think i should retake organic chemistry while attending graduate program?
I think you are looking for at least 2+ years of work. IMO I think you should be in postbac first then masters. Despite of the numbers, you haven't shown you can get As in hard sciences, and graduate level courses are tougher (except for those research units). What makes you think you can suddenly get As doing graduate level courses. Sorry if I sound harsh but if you go to master directly ,in my opion, worst case scenario you end up doing bad, not only you are adding more debts but also you run out of options. While you stil have an option of advancing from postbac to masters, it is bad idea to go back to taking upper div bio classes after masters. You know your own capabilities so in the end it's up to you
Best luck
can i just retake organic chemistry I and recover the D, or do i have to retake 2 as well eventhough I got C in orgaic chemistry II?
You can get into a grad program with a 2.3?
I would recommend just doing master's.i've been playing with some numbers and it seems like i can get my gpa up to 2.7~2.77 if i take 1 year of post-bacc and do really well in it..by then i would have taken all of upper level bio courses as undergraduate. do you think it's worth it to do one year of post-bacc before enrolling in master's even though it's well below 3.0?
A post-bacc is probably a waste of time with that low of a GPA. Do a SMP and get a 3.75+ in it, at which point schools pay much less attention to your Undergrad GPA, if at all. Doing a post-bacc with the intent of then going on to do a Master's is kind of counterproductive.
while that is a valid point, not all schools do that. nova is really the only school that i found to more or less neglect a low ugrad gpa in favor of a high masters gpa. most other schools that i spoke to still look at the cumulative gpa of both ugrad+grad. if it's below their standards, then they'll give the benefit of the doubt to the high masters gpa... so it's not like they completely neglect the ugrad gpa