- Joined
- Nov 18, 2005
- Messages
- 158
- Reaction score
- 0
Golly, he just wanted the old unmatched lists. There's no nrmp rule against that. 🙄
Flash: The NRMP has never not done what it says? 🙄 Remember Urology fiasco? There are rumors that the match overmatched another specialty again this year. Gmee breaks bear! And the match can't sue you, just like the poor urologists-wannabees couldn't sue the match. They have pesky little mandatory 'binding arbitration' clause, so it'd be expensive for them, too. Sauce for goose is sauce for gander.Panda Bear said:It is a violation of your contractual agreement with the NRMP which you signed as condition of your being allowed access to the match.
GoofyDoc said:Golly, he just wanted the old unmatched lists. There's no nrmp rule against that. 🙄
scholes said:Yeah, what is this overmatched?
Also, I belive the urology match is not run by the NRMP. I thought the American Urological Association does their own match, but I certianly may be wrong. If so, the urology match messing up shouldnt affect the main residency match through the NRMP.
spalatin said:Flash: The NRMP has never not done what it says? 🙄 Remember Urology fiasco? There are rumors that the match overmatched another specialty again this year. Gmee breaks bear! And the match can't sue you, just like the poor urologists-wannabees couldn't sue the match. They have pesky little mandatory 'binding arbitration' clause, so it'd be expensive for them, too. Sauce for goose is sauce for gander.
MLK and Ghandi advocated civil disobedience. Maybe brave souls 'violating' match contract will be what it takes to fix NRMP.
Hockeyguy said:i am totally offended that people violote the agreement - like these guys did
Panda Bear said:With that being said, I don't know if the NRMP needs to be fixed. It certainly does what it's supposed to do. I confess that at any point in the interview trail if someone had offered me a contract I would have signed it which was one advantage of the old system.
Panda Bear said:I think they need to do a "second match" instead of the scramble. It seems kind of unfair that filling an unmatched spot can come down to who had the fastest computer or the best phone service.
anatolyk said:Continuing conversation about posting prior year lists, this is also illegal as the lists are subject of NRMP's copyright. Recently NRMP made it clear. This is why you see it gone from most sites including scutwork.
quicksilver2 said:This was actually discussed last year by the NRMP and input was given by various organizations, including student groups. I think the feeling was that while it might help those who are scrambling, the time necessary for the logistics of a Second Match would only increase the length of time people who matched the first time around would have to wait and would still result in a few having to scramble. It was also felt that it was a relatively small number of people that it would assist in the end, at least in terms of US Seniors.
Hurricane said:Out of curiosity, does anyone know the reason we don't find out where we matched until after the scramble? I don't see how me knowing where I matched affects someone in the scramble, or vice versa.
Gfunk6 said:I don't think the NRMP wants matched applicants to remain in the dark per se, but rather they want to keep everyone in the dark. The rationale, I suspect, is to prevent people who did not pay to register with the NRMP from getting any advantage over the people who did pay.