Podiatrist Demand

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

dapmp91

Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2006
Messages
402
Reaction score
0
Points
4,566
  1. Pre-Medical
hello, well I was talking with my parents about podiatry...and they asked me if the demand for podiatrists is average to above average, I didn't really know so I shrugged it off. Anyways, I am/was premed, but I want to know if I become a podiatrist, will I be "in demand" for my services? thanks guys, please no sarcastic comments🙂
 
hello, well I was talking with my parents about podiatry...and they asked me if the demand for podiatrists is average to above average, I didn't really know so I shrugged it off. Anyways, I am/was premed, but I want to know if I become a podiatrist, will I be "in demand" for my services? thanks guys, please no sarcastic comments🙂

From the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

Average growth. Demand for podiatric services should
be steady as the incidence of foot-related injuries in-
creases with an aging, active population.

http://www.bls.gov/opub/ooq/2002/spring/art01.pdf
 
From the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

Average growth. Demand for podiatric services should
be steady as the incidence of foot-related injuries in-
creases with an aging, active population.

http://www.bls.gov/opub/ooq/2002/spring/art01.pdf

Yea, plenty of work to do. A podiatrist is in as much demand as any other type of doctor. Actually, twice as much as most people have two feet!🙂

But seriously, I have worked in more than one hospital where podiatry was actually one of the busiest services.
 
The good docs nearly always have essentially as many patients than they want to see, but IMO, demand always comes down to skills (both procedural skills and PR skills).

If you can only do basics like nails, orthotics, heel pain conservative treatment, and padding... well, you might not be in real high demand. Don't get me wrong: you will still have a ton of patients with those common complaints and needs, but if there's 100 other guys in your city who can do what you can, you see the potential problem.

If you can add bunions, hammertoes, advanced heel pain modalities, neuromas, etc to your service offerings, then you will attract more patients. Still, everyone coming out of residency today can do those cases.

If you can routinely handle complex flatfoot reconstruction, pediatric developmental abnormalities, rearfoot trauma and ex-fix, flaps, etc with good results... well, you have elite skills. Chances that other pods - or any kind of docs in the area - won't have the level of knowledge that you do.

Also, it often matters more what you are "known for." That will get you referrals. The simple fact that you can do a Charcot foot reconstruct or a PCDO with TAL does little good if most primary care docs in the area don't know that. Sadly, I've seen a few docs with great skills or a very sharp diagnostic eye who have a tough time filling their appointments due to networking difficulty. Some of that can be the fact that it does take time to build a reputation, but being outgoing and a good communicator is still essential even for an established practitioner. Networking, establishing a reputation, and carving out a niche are key factors and recurring themes that you will quickly notice in many highly successful and renowned DPMs.
 
On an unrelated note - is there any rhyme or reason to why mods close threads any more?
 
On an unrelated note - is there any rhyme or reason to why mods close threads any more?

They do this when the thead has deteriorated far from the original topic and when people start to get into big arguments. They try to keep it professional. There is no need of riff raff in a professional world.
 
They do this when the thead has deteriorated far from the original topic and when people start to get into big arguments. They try to keep it professional. There is no need of riff raff in a professional world.

This is an anonymous internet forum for the discussion of healthcare education topics. As long as the members of the forum are discussing such issues professionally, I don't see why threads should be closed, just because the topic has evolved into something not directly related to the initial post. What about times when the OP may still wish the initial topic is discussed, but people hijack the thread (like right now)? Does it get closed? Why are threads closed, then? And especially if the topic is still related to the initial post.

Additionally, while I can understand why they do it and accept it if it's SDN policy, but I don't think they should close threads just because the OP wants it closed. This is a public forum, not for their own personal use - if people are discussing a topic still it seems silly to close a thread just because one person wants it closed as long as the discussion is professional and pertinent. If they wish to retract their post, they can edit it. God knows we always tell people "Do a search!" when they ask a question that's been discussed in previous threads ad nauseum, why force people to make their own (as others have been closed at the OP's will)? Again - this is a public and anonymous forum. Just seems unnecessary and an arbitrary choice of moderators. In my opinion they should let threads run their course unless specifically unprofessional, inappropriate (off the topic of the forum in which they are posted), or blatantly troublesome.

No offense to the moderators (I'm quite sure they're doing their best), but I've seen several examples of these things lately, and it just strikes me as odd.
 
This is an exellent response to to the original question.

The good docs nearly always have essentially as many patients than they want to see, but IMO, demand always comes down to skills (both procedural skills and PR skills).

If you can only do basics like nails, orthotics, heel pain conservative treatment, and padding... well, you might not be in real high demand. Don't get me wrong: you will still have a ton of patients with those common complaints and needs, but if there's 100 other guys in your city who can do what you can, you see the potential problem.

If you can add bunions, hammertoes, advanced heel pain modalities, neuromas, etc to your service offerings, then you will attract more patients. Still, everyone coming out of residency today can do those cases.

If you can routinely handle complex flatfoot reconstruction, pediatric developmental abnormalities, rearfoot trauma and ex-fix, flaps, etc with good results... well, you have elite skills. Chances that other pods - or any kind of docs in the area - won't have the level of knowledge that you do.

Also, it often matters more what you are "known for." That will get you referrals. The simple fact that you can do a Charcot foot reconstruct or a PCDO with TAL does little good if most primary care docs in the area don't know that. Sadly, I've seen a few docs with great skills or a very sharp diagnostic eye who have a tough time filling their appointments due to networking difficulty. Some of that can be the fact that it does take time to build a reputation, but being outgoing and a good communicator is still essential even for an established practitioner. Networking, establishing a reputation, and carving out a niche are key factors and recurring themes that you will quickly notice in many highly successful and renowned DPMs.
 
This is an anonymous internet forum for the discussion of healthcare education topics. As long as the members of the forum are discussing such issues professionally, I don't see why threads should be closed, just because the topic has evolved into something not directly related to the initial post. What about times when the OP may still wish the initial topic is discussed, but people hijack the thread (like right now)? Does it get closed? Why are threads closed, then? And especially if the topic is still related to the initial post.

Additionally, while I can understand why they do it and accept it if it's SDN policy, but I don't think they should close threads just because the OP wants it closed. This is a public forum, not for their own personal use - if people are discussing a topic still it seems silly to close a thread just because one person wants it closed as long as the discussion is professional and pertinent. If they wish to retract their post, they can edit it. God knows we always tell people "Do a search!" when they ask a question that's been discussed in previous threads ad nauseum, why force people to make their own (as others have been closed at the OP's will)? Again - this is a public and anonymous forum. Just seems unnecessary and an arbitrary choice of moderators. In my opinion they should let threads run their course unless specifically unprofessional, inappropriate (off the topic of the forum in which they are posted), or blatantly troublesome.

No offense to the moderators (I'm quite sure they're doing their best), but I've seen several examples of these things lately, and it just strikes me as odd.

👍👍👍
 
NY State Department of Labor is predicting a Podiatrist shortage that will persist until 2020.
 
This is an anonymous internet forum for the discussion of healthcare education topics. As long as the members of the forum are discussing such issues professionally, I don't see why threads should be closed, just because the topic has evolved into something not directly related to the initial post. What about times when the OP may still wish the initial topic is discussed, but people hijack the thread (like right now)? Does it get closed? Why are threads closed, then? And especially if the topic is still related to the initial post.

Additionally, while I can understand why they do it and accept it if it's SDN policy, but I don't think they should close threads just because the OP wants it closed. This is a public forum, not for their own personal use - if people are discussing a topic still it seems silly to close a thread just because one person wants it closed as long as the discussion is professional and pertinent. If they wish to retract their post, they can edit it. God knows we always tell people "Do a search!" when they ask a question that's been discussed in previous threads ad nauseum, why force people to make their own (as others have been closed at the OP's will)? Again - this is a public and anonymous forum. Just seems unnecessary and an arbitrary choice of moderators. In my opinion they should let threads run their course unless specifically unprofessional, inappropriate (off the topic of the forum in which they are posted), or blatantly troublesome.

No offense to the moderators (I'm quite sure they're doing their best), but I've seen several examples of these things lately, and it just strikes me as odd.

Thats it, this thread has deteriorated far from the original topic of demand for podiatry skills. Now people are arguing over closing threads. Time to close this thread...
 
NY State Department of Labor is predicting a Podiatrist shortage that will persist until 2020.

Is there considered to be a podiatrist shortage now? Why only until 2020?
 
Top Bottom