when it comes to scope of practice - I am the first to refer to a DPM (if I am asked...
) I do not have the specialized training nor do I want it. You are the expert and I would rather have you work on it then me f it up.
But that is for F&A problems ONLY. I find it problematic that some DPMs are moving away from their training. It would be like me (EM interest) deciding that since I already have placed a fem line - why not just toss a stent in there or repair a valve (ignore the obvious anatomical problems with this example)
As long as people stick to their scope I am all about referrals. My last 2 FP rotations had great relationships with the local DPM and many referrals were sent because patients were happy with the service/outcome. Can this be the case if we are experimentally venturing out of our scope (with extensive weekend training of course)