If I apply to SMP/Master will they do grade replacement(LIke DO) or take average of all grades for repeat classes? That was the question.
Yes, I will like to do SMP, but can not afford so only option is to go for Master, I am sure many have gone this way in the past...
Depends on the program and if I were to generalize, no would be the answer to the large majority of SMPs that will screen GPA. They do value upward trends though.
If you are set on doing a "traditional masters" try and look for Masters of Biomedical Science programs or M.S. programs that are not "true SMPs" in the sense that they require research and will throw in graduate science courses as well as medical courses but they are far more catered towards enhancing the credentials of an applicant aspiring to pursue a professional degree (DMD/DDS or MD).
And disregard what the other poster mentioned about CC. If your whole goal at this point is a step wise process and you're aiming at a Masters after retaking classes, a CC is fine. Adcoms for graduate admissions are generally pretty understanding especially if their program is catered towards remedial students. If your next step was medical school, then that would be different in that a 4 year college is encouraged if that is what they're basing your academic potential off of.
His other point though is valid. There is literally no point in retaking classes unless you're aiming for the osteopathic route. If so then by all means keep on going because you're aiming in the right direction. If it's for allopathic school then you'd be much better off going hitting the upper div sciences that w/e institution you attend offers.
Just take this into consideration. The cost of an SMP ranges from 14-25K depending on where you go. But the time spent there/quality could potentially get you into medical school in potentially half the time if you meandered around otherwise. That "half the time" let's just hypothetically say is a year maybe 2. That's 1-2 years off of your
peak income in the future. I won't try and make a gross exaggeration but I don't think 160K is being unrealistic for a conservative estimate of a peak year for a physician. Now is that 14-25K vs. the 160K worth it to you? I don't know I'm not you but I think a lot of people wold agree that taking the shorter path
(if you're prepared for it) is better. But if you don't feel you're ready or disciplined enough to handle an SMP after your retakes/informal post-bacc, you should probably follow your instincts. It's something schools will very highly consider but at the same time, perform mediocre and it's an axe through your application.