desiredusername said:
So, LT2, I appreciate your input and I have some more questions for you, your 2¢ are going to keep adding up.
In your experience, which schools regard your graduate work as important? and unimportant? If you had to do it all over would you
A)work on your UG GPA exclusively?
B)matriculate in an SMP? (1 year like Georgetown or 2 years like Boston or 1.5 like some other place?)
C)do the same thing and pursue a hard masters again?
Also, how far below the averages was your UG GPA? I don't want specifics but mine is ~3.3. Was yours similar?
Thanks for any more ¢. (yes, that's a play on words.)
hey du!-- as a side note, i think you're hilarious and i hope you get into school somewhere, i'd love to have you as a classmate. i hope i can be of some help...
disclaimer: this is a long winded post, sorry!
i don't know if i can peg a particular school type as finding graduate work important. in my case, it's been schools like penn state, VCU and SUNY upstate. someone mentioned schools that are research oriented would be interested. something to chew on (read: my opinion): the schools that are heavily research oriented are typically ranked pretty high in the US News rankings. if you look at the average GPA for those schools, it is WELL above the 3.3ish you have (and to answer your other question, mine is similar). as the schools might be interested in your research, they will NOT be interested in your ug gpa and you won't be given a chance to even explain your research. at least this has been the case for me. it's frustrating.
so, if i had to do it all over again. hmmm... at the time i entered my grad degree, i wasn't positive about medicine, i was on the fence between a PhD and MD. two years later, filling out my AMCAS, i realized i could have been supplementing my ug gpa the whole time i was in grad school. so here's what i'd do. i'd go back to grad school, and on top of my grad classes, i'd take some upper div. (non-grad level) science courses that didn't count towards my MS. these classes would get dumped into post-bacc courses, which would raise your ug gpa. so you get the best of both worlds. you get the grad degree, AND you get the ug gpa boost!!
a couple of things to think about:
-would you finish your master's in time to apply again with the same MCAT?
-would you mind taking the MCAT again?
-would you be willing to put in 3 years for a degree if your research doesn't work as planned (this is what happened to me)
-are you happy doing a hard science MS? if you're not into it, you'll hate your life and the adcoms will know this when you interview
pros for MS vs. SMP:
-you will probably gain teaching experience (if you don't have some already) which is always good
-you will have STRONG letters of rec from your PI (as long as you're not a screwball)
-you will have a strong(er) understanding of things going into medical school (i now have an MS in microbiology and am thoroughly looking forward to it in med school)
-potential for publications
-if you do a MS in a field you're interested in, it might help you match for residency (the SMP won't.)
pros for SMP vs. MS (this is opinion as i have no experience with it):
-it's a one year program
-you can build connections within the school you're taking class at (and others)
-you can get a leg up on the curriculum (i think drexel will let you test out of classes if you come from the SMP program)
i don't know the difference in cost, but most MS programs will offer a stipend if you teach so it's not terribly expensive.
phew. sorry, there's so much info i hope you can find it of some use... as always if you have questions, feel free to ask.
take care and good luck!
LT2