- Joined
- Dec 25, 2008
- Messages
- 8,123
- Reaction score
- 7,422
Does receiving post-interview rejections bode poorly for internship match?
Last edited:
HAHA! I ask myself that too. The first one is always the hardest. I'm like, "why did you make me come all the way up here if you weren't gonna take me?" 😳
HAHA! I ask myself that too. The first one is always the hardest. I'm like, "why did you make me come all the way up here if you weren't gonna take me?" 😳
I had an interview at a school where the faculty members were looking for very specific interests. The whole time during my interview, he kept saying "Well, this is what I'm studying and what I'm making my students study, and your research interests are not even close." It really made me wonder why the hell they would waste my time when they already knew what they were looking for, and clearly I wasn't a fit.
Does receiving post-interview rejections for grad school bode poorly for internship match?
By the way, this post is in no way referring to you. Just thought I would offer up what I've heard.
I had an interview at a school where the faculty members were looking for very specific interests. The whole time during my interview, he kept saying "Well, this is what I'm studying and what I'm making my students study, and your research interests are not even close." It really made me wonder why the hell they would waste my time when they already knew what they were looking for, and clearly I wasn't a fit.
What I've heard about post-interview rejections....
From what I've heard from professors-the interview is essentially the portion that weeds out those who don't socially/mentally fit with the program. In a way in a mini MSE. They want to make sure that you can handle the pressures of grad school school, work well with other students, and are mentally healthy enough to get through their program. I've heard all too often (from my MA program) that many very qualified applicants with 1500+ GRE's, etc were not admitted post interview for these exact reasons. Now, I'm not talking about the basic pressures of an interview or having a shy personality-they are literally assessing for mental/social issues. A lot of people may look good on paper-but literally can hold a conversation for 5 min (controlling for interview stress). Now, this is just what I've been told and heard from many professors after interview season. Something to think about!
.......it often comes down to small differences in how much you actually *like* the person.
What I've heard about post-interview rejections....
From what I've heard from professors-the interview is essentially the portion that weeds out those who don't socially/mentally fit with the program. In a way in a mini MSE. They want to make sure that you can handle the pressures of grad school school, work well with other students, and are mentally healthy enough to get through their program. I've heard all too often (from my MA program) that many very qualified applicants with 1500+ GRE's, etc were not admitted post interview for these exact reasons. Now, I'm not talking about the basic pressures of an interview or having a shy personality-they are literally assessing for mental/social issues. A lot of people may look good on paper-but literally can hold a conversation for 5 min (controlling for interview stress). Now, this is just what I've been told and heard from many professors after interview season. Something to think about!
Does receiving post-interview rejections bode poorly for internship match?
That is the worst to part swallow, IMO. "Oh, you looked so good on paper, we had to meet you." "Ugh, you're disgusting in person, we don't 'like' you anymore." Then you are left searching your soul and existence for the "small differences" part of you that they decided they hate.
While this is definitely one reason students receive post-interview rejections, it is far from the only reason. On average, a professor/school will interview 4-8 people for a single spot. Only a small percentage of those who will eventually receive post-interview rejections receive them because they have mental/social issues. In fact, a large percentage will get in elsewhere.
I don't believe that anywhere in my post did I ever imply this was the only reason. I am simply offering information that I've heard.
While this is definitely one reason students receive post-interview rejections, it is far from the only reason. On average, a professor/school will interview 4-8 people for a single spot. Only a small percentage of those who will eventually receive post-interview rejections receive them because they have mental/social issues. In fact, a large percentage will get in elsewhere.
I don't believe that anywhere in my post did I ever imply this was the only reason. I am simply offering information that I've heard.
I didn't think you said it was the only reason. I was merely pointing out that people reading this thread shouldn't assume a post-interview rejection means they exhibited poor social skills.
Ok, well I never said you said it was the only reason. I was merely pointing out that people shouldn't assume a post-interview rejection means they exhibited poor social skills.
Great! Glad we are on the same page! 🙂 🙂
Great! Glad we are on the same page! 🙂 🙂
🙂 Haha, and I had even edited my reply because I was afraid I had come off too harsh.
I guess for me, they mentioned that they thought my group dynamic with the other applicants was odd. I'm not even sure what that means and most people I've spoken to are kind of surprised by that one, as I've never really had any issues working with other people. I was however informed that I should not apply again to the program. I think I need some further elaboration on that one. The DCT was also VERY surprised that I didn't have any other interviews and did not realize how important their school was to me. I would never apply somewhere where I did not plan to attend if accepted. She did however advise that maybe I should consider medical school, as it's easier to be accepted, and the awards are better. I'm sure that'd be more of a consideration if I could do my research as a psychiatrist. Sometimes, I just feel like I'm being typecast.
I guess for me, they mentioned that they thought my group dynamic with the other applicants was odd. I'm not even sure what that means and most people I've spoken to are kind of surprised by that one, as I've never really had any issues working with other people. I was however informed that I should not apply again to the program. I think I need some further elaboration on that one. The DCT was also VERY surprised that I didn't have any other interviews and did not realize how important their school was to me. I would never apply somewhere where I did not plan to attend if accepted. She did however advise that maybe I should consider medical school, as it's easier to be accepted, and the awards are better. I'm sure that'd be more of a consideration if I could do my research as a psychiatrist. Sometimes, I just feel like I'm being typecast.
From my perspective, I feel like I'm on some twisted version of The Bachelor.
I guess for me, they mentioned that they thought my group dynamic with the other applicants was odd. I'm not even sure what that means and most people I've spoken to are kind of surprised by that one, as I've never really had any issues working with other people. I was however informed that I should not apply again to the program. I think I need some further elaboration on that one. The DCT was also VERY surprised that I didn't have any other interviews and did not realize how important their school was to me. I would never apply somewhere where I did not plan to attend if accepted. She did however advise that maybe I should consider medical school, as it's easier to be accepted, and the awards are better. I'm sure that'd be more of a consideration if I could do my research as a psychiatrist. Sometimes, I just feel like I'm being typecast.
Wow, that is a weird situation. I am sorry you had to go through something like that. The fact that the DCT practically suggested that you should switch career does not sit well with me. They are drawing too many conclusions based on limited information about you. If you feel that you really want to be a research psychologist, then continue to fight for your dream. Applying to clinical programs is hard, but that is the nature of the game.
So here I am posting in this thread along with everyone else. After a great interview, at what I would say a match school and not so competitive, I get rejected. Not waitlisted, but rejected 🙁
So of course I am asking the same questions as everyone else. I really want feedback on this. Should I email the program director or my POI? The program director has been in touch with me recently so I don't know... How do you word emails like this? 😕
(that's bogus because she's a dirty *****, but I digress..)
I really hate feeling like that poster, but could we please agree to refrain from using such derogatory and gendered phrases. It makes the atmosphere much less professional and more hostile. QUOTE]
Agreed. Additionally, I have to say that just because she may meet your requirements for such derogatory remarks does not necessarily mean that she was wrong. Just because she may be loose in your eyes does not mean that she is interested in every single guy. I think it actually might be very telling. A woman who, in your opinion, enjoys the company of many men was creeped out by this particular guy. That would tell me a lot.
I really hate feeling like that poster, but could we please agree to refrain from using such derogatory and gendered phrases. It makes the atmosphere much less professional and more hostile.
Thanks, I definitely understand that was an emotional situation.
i really hate feeling like that poster, but could we please agree to refrain from using such derogatory and gendered phrases. It makes the atmosphere much less professional and more hostile.
Thanks, i definitely understand that was an emotional situation.
I guess for me, they mentioned that they thought my group dynamic with the other applicants was odd. I'm not even sure what that means and most people I've spoken to are kind of surprised by that one, as I've never really had any issues working with other people. I was however informed that I should not apply again to the program. I think I need some further elaboration on that one. The DCT was also VERY surprised that I didn't have any other interviews and did not realize how important their school was to me. I would never apply somewhere where I did not plan to attend if accepted. She did however advise that maybe I should consider medical school, as it's easier to be accepted, and the awards are better. I'm sure that'd be more of a consideration if I could do my research as a psychiatrist. Sometimes, I just feel like I'm being typecast.
Hmm. I really think you should ask the DCT for more information and to clarify her statements about you, especially if you plan to apply again.![]()
I plan to ask for clarification. I kind of wonder if these were comments from other people and not ones which she had herself, as I remember asking her to clarify, and she couldn't really provide examples. Doesn't mean I can't try again.
I get the sense they've already ranked us before having us come for the interview. That interview was not mentor-based. Decisions were made by an admissions committee. I feel really bad for the person who interviewed twice there and missed a major family event for it. That must be really harsh.
I've never heard someone outright say "dont bother reapplying" but the notion doenst seem too far off. Consider this-- if you're scores are good enough to get in, but you dont get in, clearly there was something that didnt fit well with them about how you interviewed. Most likely (not to be offensive, just practical) they werent digging how your personality/work ethic/ play skills/stress skills/etc seemed, so what about that would change in 1 year?
I really hate feeling like that poster, but could we please agree to refrain from using such derogatory and gendered phrases. It makes the atmosphere much less professional and more hostile. QUOTE]
Agreed. Additionally, I have to say that just because she may meet your requirements for such derogatory remarks does not necessarily mean that she was wrong. Just because she may be loose in your eyes does not mean that she is interested in every single guy. I think it actually might be very telling. A woman who, in your opinion, enjoys the company of many men was creeped out by this particular guy. That would tell me a lot.
Sorry about violating the nature of the board.
I don't particularly agree with this. It can happen, but it is also often the case that if a POI could have accepted 2 people, the person who was rejected may have gotten in. Thus, if there was extra funding, they would have been accepted. I interviewed at a school one year and was rejected after interviewing, and the following year I was accepted.
Maybe this is just one of those programs that doesn't re-interview people? 😕 (Unless you met someone who had interviewed prior and then was re-invited... couldn't tell from your wording).
I don't particularly agree with this. It can happen, but it is also often the case that if a POI could have accepted 2 people, the person who was rejected may have gotten in. Thus, if there was extra funding, they would have been accepted. I interviewed at a school one year and was rejected after interviewing, and the following year I was accepted.